At least season 3 of Picard was a bit more exciting. Even if most did come from nostalgia.The worst of the Star Trek shows - I started to type "easily the worst," then remembered Picard.
One thing I'll give to the Discovery creators is that they were bold and took a big risk in their approach starting with the first episode. They had to know a lot of the older fans wouldn't like it and were thinking about drawing a younger fanbase in the future. Did tying Burhnam to Spock really help that much? I'm glad they didn't go back to that in the later seasons.
The worst of the Star Trek shows - I started to type "easily the worst," then remembered Picard.
Say what you will of the writers of DISCO, they actually did try to listen to fan criticisms and addressed them. It wasn’t always perfect (the makeover of Klingons in S2 is very nonsensical and at odds with what we saw in S1).
You can blame me then! I didn’t dislike the show when it first came out, but I knew what I didn’t like!I feel that was the greatest failure of DISCO that they always chased the people who hated the show versus its fans.
What if you LIKED The Klingon War, Section 31, and Michael's relationship with Sarek?
At least Ford built something. Musk has done nothing buy buy things and slap his name on them. But this is veering into TNZ territory. lolI hate Elon Musk more than anything but I don't forsee him being forgotten sadly. He will be remembered in a very Henry Ford way.
Excuse me while I vomit.
We got as much Klingon War as we were ever going to get, so no one missed out there. The series spent some time setting up a Section 31 spin-off, so that certainly wasn't abandoned. And Sarek stuck around for two seasons, so they weren't racing to get him out the door.I feel that was the greatest failure of DISCO that they always chased the people who hated the show versus its fans.
What if you LIKED The Klingon War, Section 31, and Michael's relationship with Sarek?
I do.What if you LIKED The Klingon War, Section 31, and Michael's relationship with Sarek?
But I think if Discovery really wanted to focus on only pleasing its own fans, it wouldn't have had anything to do with Star Trek in the first place. Tying into a franchise purely to take advantage of its built-in fanbase and then driving the existing fans away is counter-productive.
Oh almost surely.Both Discovery and Strange New Worlds should have divorced themselves from continuity and "boldly" (to use a familiar term) done their own thing.
It would still be Star Trek, just a different version of Star Trek. And they could have the freedom to do whatever they wanted to do and it would have opened up all the possibilities to do Xenomorph Gorn, fishhead Klingons and whatever else they could think of.
And, honestly, in the end I think that's what will end up happening with this property. I truly believe some future version of Star Trek is going to shunt at least some of the Paramount+ stuff into its own reality and not feel compelled to have to live with "The Burn" and the choices Discovery made for the future, and retcon it into its own reality.
Both Discovery and Strange New Worlds should have divorced themselves from continuity and "boldly" (to use a familiar term) done their own thing.
It would still be Star Trek, just a different version of Star Trek. And they could have the freedom to do whatever they wanted to do and it would have opened up all the possibilities to do Xenomorph Gorn, fishhead Klingons and whatever else they could think of.
And, honestly, in the end I think that's what will end up happening with this property. I truly believe some future version of Star Trek is going to shunt at least some of the Paramount+ stuff into its own reality and not feel compelled to have to live with "The Burn" and the choices Discovery made for the future, and retcon it into its own reality.
Absolutely. That's a choice they made though. They could've easily told the same story in their own brand new setting and they wouldn't have even had to change the uniforms or Klingons. Keep Sarek, call him Keras. Michael Burnham is now Kcops' brother. If audiences are asking 'Who is Kcops and why should I care that Burnham is his sister?' then that's a problem with the story.DISCO has many flaws but it can't exist without Star Trek. Everything in the show is tied to something related to Star Trek.
The Kelvin Universe movies had some success with that, but I think one thing that makes Star Trek (and Star Wars) special is that it's not a mess of reboots and alternate continuities like you get with other long running universes. New authors add to the story, but the history remains intact. Every new series is a jumping on point for new viewers but every old series happened. That's something that should be celebrated, encouraged and protected.Both Discovery and Strange New Worlds should have divorced themselves from continuity and "boldly" (to use a familiar term) done their own thing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.