That would be my guess. Maybe he's Susan's father.With the parent theme running through this season, maybe Sean Pertwee would play the Doctor's son? Would keep things meta, and respectful.
That would be my guess. Maybe he's Susan's father.With the parent theme running through this season, maybe Sean Pertwee would play the Doctor's son? Would keep things meta, and respectful.
Sean Pertwee is playing Susan! You heard it here first!Yup, that would make the most sense to me. Comes with the added bonus of Sean playing his father's son, thus avoiding the very thing he said he would never do but still honor his father.
If that happens, the Doctor would be wearing his own son's face (they do look a lot alike) in his third incarnation!Yup, that would make the most sense to me. Comes with the added bonus of Sean playing his father's son, thus avoiding the very thing he said he would never do but still honor his father.
If that happens, the Doctor would be wearing his own son's face (they do look a lot alike) in his third incarnation!
Salamander and Abbott: eat your hearts out!
If this is true, you have to question, if nothing else, the scheduling of the episodes. One near the start which implies that they’ve been travelling for 6 months. Two consecutive ones in which the plot begins with the Doctor stepping on something. And two consecutive ones in which the - brand new - Doctor hardly features. I’m enjoying the episodes so far but this ordering is beginning to seem really odd.Oh FFS. Apparently Ncuti is almost totally absent again for this week's episode.* Surely when it became clear he wasn't going to be available for most of the first month of their shooting schedule the correct thing to do was postpone it. It's not like they're making 13 episode seasons any more. That's 1/4 of it he's barely there for.
*Most of his scenes are the "zoom call" bits we've seen in the trailers and she's the main character in it.
![]()
Two consecutive ones in which the plot begins with the Doctor stepping on something.
If this is true, you have to question, if nothing else, the scheduling of the episodes. One near the start which implies that they’ve been travelling for 6 months. Two consecutive ones in which the plot begins with the Doctor stepping on something. And two consecutive ones in which the - brand new - Doctor hardly features. I’m enjoying the episodes so far but this ordering is beginning to seem really odd.
Or was this a case where BBC or Disney insisted they needed a season by the spring, and this was the only way to meet that deadline?
Actually, if there had to be two Doctor Lite episodes, episodes 4 and 5 would probably be the best place for them, being right there in the middle. We get sort of a sandwich out of it if you will, three "proper" Doctor and Companion adventures, then two lite episodes, and we finish with three more "proper" episodes.If anything it feels like Dot and Bubble either should have been episode 3, or else 73 Yards should have been episode 6 maybe?
Doctor and Ruby lite confirmed by the Radio Times review.
The concept of episodes that are 'Doctor Lite' doesn't work; stop utilizing it.
I don't normally anyways.Don't look at DenOfGeek today whatever you do.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.