• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers General Disco Chat Thread

Interview with Wilson Cruz. He confirms again that they always planned on bringing Culber back after his death in season 1, it had nothing to do with backlash/reaction. Though he wasn’t told how it was going to happen at the time (I wouldn’t be surprised if the writers themselves didn’t know yet)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I'd attribute that to the revolving door they seemingly placed in the writers' room until season 3.
Indeed. That seems to be the thing that is over looked with Discovery. The BTS drama didn't allow people to stay and learn. They moved on or were scrambling a bit. I enjoy Discovery very much, but it has problems, and the biggest ones are simply that it isn't consistent enough.

I think going to the 32nd century was a mistake. I think all the canon whining led to worse story telling for fear of Season 1 criticism, and it became so protective within itself that it had to go to TNG to find a story.
 
One other thing that seems to have been missed. When the season started we were told it was a swashbuckling clue hunt mystery with no existential threats to overcome, unlike before. And now we seem to be working on an all-out war with the Breen while preventing them acquiring the ultimate galactic life-altering weapon....
 
One other thing that seems to have been missed. When the season started we were told it was a swashbuckling clue hunt mystery with no existential threats to overcome, unlike before. And now we seem to be working on an all-out war with the Breen while preventing them acquiring the ultimate galactic life-altering weapon....

Big, dumb threat at the end of each season, essentially never spoken of again is the one thing every DIS and PIC season shared in common, regardless of very different tones otherwise.

I don't get why Kurtzman (i place the onus on him, since he's the only common thread between both shows all the way through) thinks we'd want the same stakes eight different times in a row. Plenty of Trek movies (notably TWOK) were successful with smaller, personal stakes.

What about stories with personal stakes, like saving the life of a beloved character? What about focusing on a smaller-scale crisis?

With just a bit of work upping the awe and wonder, this season of Discovery could havd been about improving the status quo with progenitor tech, rather than protecting the status quo against the Breen. And I tend to think plot arcs where things end up better work better thematically in Trek, since it's a progressive setting.
 
Last edited:
When the season started we were told it was a swashbuckling clue hunt mystery with no existential threats to overcome
That was by reviewers who had only seen the first 4 episodes. There was no hint of that in those.

edit: well I guess there was in Season 4.
I don't get why Kurtzman (i place the onus on him, since he's the only common thread between both shows all the way through)

He didn't write some of those seasons though.
 
What about stories with personal stakes, like saving the life of a beloved character? What about focusing on a smaller-scale crisis?

Which is what Pic S1 was - saving Soji - and her folks too. Until the synth cavalry was summoned.

Similarly Pic S3 could have been about protecting Jack from the various people he had done over in the past.....
 
I’m a year behind on the Delta Flyers podcast, and they’re at the Hirogen Holograms gone rogue episode, and there’s a breen hologram.

Robbie McNeil wonders what’s under the helmet, and Garrett Wang is like ‘they’re probably some gelatinous fluid”.

He was so very close lol
 
Because Marvel.

This is a good point to note that a lot of people think the post-Endgame issues of Marvel come down in part to stakes issues as well.

Sure, Marvel movies tended towards pretty high stakes. But lots of the early ones had comparably low stakes. This was particularly the case with first movies in franchises, like Iron Man, Ant Man, Spiderman: Homecoming, ect.

In contrast, Marvel has relied on blown-out stakes in recent years in nearly every movie - even in origin stories like Eternals. Not to mention the most successful movie in 2023 - GOTG 3 - was basically just about saving Rocket, with the rest of the heroism more or less incidental.
 
Last edited:
Huh I thought Star Trek moved to only being on P+ in Canada, but I’m seeing DSC S5 on my TV guide airing on CTV Sci-Fi

Edit: wait I got that confused with them pulling all Trek from Crave streaming, not from TV airing.
 
Huh I thought Star Trek moved to only being on P+ in Canada, but I’m seeing DSC S5 on my TV guide airing on CTV Sci-Fi

Edit: wait I got that confused with them pulling all Trek from Crave streaming, not from TV airing.
I've heard it was on both, P+ as well. But that's just 2nd hand info.
 
True, true. I have issues with the plot of NWH, but the stakes work.

Unlike Discovery, where the stakes seem to lower every season. The first season would have destroyed the entire multiverse, the second all organic life in our universe, the third all spacefaring vessels in the galaxy, the fourth several key planets in the Federation, and the fifth just the Federation as a government will be conquered.
 
This is a good point to note that a lot of people think the post-Endgame issues of Marvel come down in part to stakes issues as well.

Sure, Marvel movies tended towards pretty high stakes. But lots of the early ones had comparably low stakes. This was particularly the case with first movies in franchises, like Iron Man, Ant Man, Spiderman: Homecoming, ect.
Yes, but what made money? That will be the question not how it progressed.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top