How is Susan a newborn in 2004?Starting to wonder if Ruby is actually Susan or something and that explains the snow and why the Doctor gets weepy.
Yes.How is Susan a newborn in 2004?
Well, she is descended from the Timeless Child, who reset to infancy every now and then, although I don’t recall how. Was it something the TLs did, or just something that happens naturally?
Ummm, Chameleon arch? Doctor is half human? etc. I'm just throwing ideas out there... Really, what I'm saying is I feel there is some connection considering how often they bring up the Doctor being a grandparent this season.Ruby is definitely human. The scan the Doctor made of her at the end of "Space Babies"confirmed her as homo sapien. If she had two hearts, surely the tardis would have detected that.
Fair enough. It's just that Ruby being Susan seems a little too on the nose and obvious to me. How about this? Ruby is a younger version of Mrs Flood and they are both a future regeneration of Susan? The older version of this of this regeneration, Mrs Flood, remembers her time with the Doctor, while the younger version of this regeneration, Ruby, for whatever reason, does not. Or, perhaps, cannot. Her remembering the Doctor this early in this regeneration would disrupt a future fixed point of in time in Ruby's future.Ummm, Chameleon arch? Doctor is half human? etc. I'm just throwing ideas out there... Really, what I'm saying is I feel there is some connection considering how often they bring up the Doctor being a grandparent this season.
Not a bad episode. One wonders how much, if any, of the 15th Doctor he saw before he wrote it. Feels at times to be dialogue for a Moffat type Doctor.
Starting to wonder if Ruby is actually Susan or something and that explains the snow and why the Doctor gets weepy.
I do know what you mean, when RTD wrote for Smith in TSJA he felt like a very different character
What I found jarring about Smith being on SJA was hearing him speak typical RTD style dialogue. IE, referring to the aliens in that story by their full grandiose name and titles.I do know what you mean, when RTD wrote for Smith in TSJA he felt like a very different character
The Doctor mentioned that Villengard supplies weapons to both sides of every conflict.How did the Anglicans not know it was their own mine? Didn’t they buy it and plant it? Or did the Villengard plant the mines themselves without the Anglicans knowing?
Though they did suggest he left the TARDIS prematurely so maybe he hadn't finished packing.My only gripe is the absence of the sonic screwdriver.
Yes, he doesn't need to always use it but it's absence is quite glaring. Simply throwing in the word "deadlocked" would have helped lol.
But there isn’t another side in this conflict.The Doctor mentioned that Villengard supplies weapons to both sides of every conflict.
Yes, but it would account for them not knowing whether or not it was one of their mines. And not only was it invisible, but at the beginning, Vater and the other soldier discuss that the minefield hadn’t been there the previous day and that they were known to “migrate.” Even in the real world, area denial weapons are everyone’s problem, so it wouldn’t matter who originally placed it, especially if these particular mines were designed to move autonomously.But there isn’t another side in this conflict.
It was made clear that they didn't know there was no other side until the Doctor told them.But there isn’t another side in this conflict.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.