Nah. We're talking psychic waves traveling through sub-space. Like something out of Star Trek...oh, wait.It's like all uranium being suddenly rendered inert because someone from Pripyat stubbed their toe.
Nah. We're talking psychic waves traveling through sub-space. Like something out of Star Trek...oh, wait.It's like all uranium being suddenly rendered inert because someone from Pripyat stubbed their toe.
Nah. We're talking psychic waves traveling through sub-space. Like something out of Star Trek...oh, wait.
I'm perfectly happy with gods like being who can alter matter with a thought, telepathic aliens and humans, pills that give you telekinesis, humans transformed into gods by exotic radiation and all that Trek "bullshit".Complete bullshit having happened in Star Trek before does not mean we should be happy when it happens again.
...humans transformed into gods by exotic radiation and all that Trek "bullshit".
The Terran Empire continues to exist because of an artificial intervention, not the natural flow of time within its own continuity.That doesn't really answer the question at all. "Deserved" implies a standard of some measure, not whether or not they can maintain the power base. Of course the Terran Empire thrives off of imbalance of power; that's how many empires work. What makes this one less deserving.
Ok. I don't disagree. So...you still don't answer the question.The Terran Empire continues to exist because of an artificial intervention, not the natural flow of time within its own continuity.
What's that standard, since I have worked hard to ignore that nonsense?By the standard established by Daniels and the temporal prime directive, it was an unnatural disruption of the timeline that didn't "deserve" to exist.
The writing is very hit or miss. Sub-Space psychic wave isn't a miss in my book.I imagine that is what happened with Mitchell and Dehner in "Where No Man...". Silly ideas can be great with some decent writing, which is where Discovery falters a lot of the time.
Hmmm. I'll quote myself quoting WikipediaI just realized, I don't think I mentioned when DISCO jumped the shark. Several times...
1. Being set before TOS.
2. Making Burnham Spock's adopted sister. (Though it did at least give us "Lethe".)
3. The Red Angel.
4. Control.
5. Section 31 having an entire fleet of ships.
6. The cause of The Burn.
Take your pick, because there's plenty of times this series has jumped the shark.
Not sure any of those fit the definition.The idiom "jumping the shark" or "jump the shark" is a term that is used to argue that a creative work or entity has reached a point in which it has exhausted its core intent and is introducing new ideas that are discordant with, or an extreme exaggeration of, its original purpose."
That's the interesting thing about Discovery. There seems to be a wide diversity on which seasons of it were good and which weren't. That always exists with all shows, all ST series. But it seems to be more with Discovery.I agree with this - for better or worse, Discovery has been more or less the same since day one. There's no big moment where the show got much better or much worse.
This probably has to do with this...all ST series. But it seems to be more with Discovery.
I think.DS9 changed a bit more. Not by much. But, I miss Season 1 Discovery a lot.Getting back to your comment, "Discovery has been more or less the same since day one." I'd disagree. I think it probably has changed more than most ST series from beginning to end.
I don't know. I'm a huge DS9 fan. It changed a lot. But man Discovery has changed so much more I think. It's also been awhile since I've seen DS9 so it could be that DIS is fresher in my mind. Especially after the time jumping episode.This probably has to do with this...
I think.DS9 changed a bit more. Not by much. But, I miss Season 1 Discovery a lot.
I stopped watching DS9 and came back.I don't know. I'm a huge DS9 fan. It changed a lot. But man Discovery has changed so much more I think. It's also been awhile since I've seen DS9 so it could be that DIS is fresher in my mind. Especially after the time jumping episode.
Maybe the difference is that I liked the DS9 changes as a rule whereas the changes in DIS weren't always for the better. So maybe they stood out more?I stopped watching DS9 and came back.
It changed a lot.
No, I didn't. Maybe someday. But, "Move Along Home" and "If Wishes were Horses" creeped me out. Hard to want to continue on.But you're right, DS9 changed a lot. And shame on you for stopping partway through!! Glad you came back though. Did you ever catchup on the ones you missed?
I don't blame you there! As big of a DS9 fan as I am, the first season was pretty horrendous overall.No, I didn't. Maybe someday. But, "Move Along Home" and "If Wishes were Horses" creeped me out. Hard to want to continue on.
Big Crisis of Galactic portent that only the DISCO team can solve. Command level guest-star. Heart felt talks. Sounds like every season of DISCO to me.I don't know. I'm a huge DS9 fan. It changed a lot. But man Discovery has changed so much more I think. It's also been awhile since I've seen DS9 so it could be that DIS is fresher in my mind. Especially after the time jumping episode.
True. Some aspects have remained the same. But a lot has changed.Big Crisis of Galactic portent that only the DISCO team can solve. Command level guest-star. Heart felt talks. Sounds like every season of DISCO to me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.