The events and timeframe of TOS should be massaged by the later canon.
Or they can be creative and come up with their own events and dates.
The events and timeframe of TOS should be massaged by the later canon.
I always assumed that the Warp Seven Project wasn't the Daedalus. I agree with others that this design seems older/simpler than the NX and probably wasn't any faster, and likely a bit slower. Personally, I think there was probably a lead ship class after the NX that we didn't see, which would have been in turn followed by the actual Warp Seven ship. There are a number of fanon designs that fit the bill nicely, perhaps the Baton Rouge class or a reimagined version.
I always kind of dismissed this NX-01 concept art by John Eaves as looking to advanced and to close to the Constitution for it to work in the era. But I recently saw some renders by artist Chris Kuhn that really helped to bring it to life.
It doesn't work perfectly.... Personally, I'd give it a little bit more of a Kelvin look, with maybe some pop-up weapon ports, and less "glowy" nacelles. Maybe an NX-01 style dish as the front.....
I do like the idea of it being a fairly small ship. The saucer rim being a single deck in height. Sorta a Constitution 0.5.
Looks way better than the NX or the Daedalus. Might be a good design in action.But it could almost work as an early Federation explorer. After the dust has settled from the Romulan War, and Starfleet in no longer pumping out the utilitarian looking Daedalus class, they finally let the engineers put a little more flare into their designs.
They certainly help to insert it into the design lineage of the SNW Enterprise. Same with the Bridge window and the illuminated area in front of the Bridge.Yeah, it looks ok, but those Eaves-inspired unnecessary cutouts in the nacelle pylons need to go. They perform no function other than looking 'kewl.'
They certainly help to insert it into the design lineage of the SNW Enterprise. Same with the Bridge window and the illuminated area in front of the Bridge.
They've kinda grown on me. I can't imagine her without them at this point.Yes, and the SNW Enterprise has those unnecessary cutouts as well. The bridge window and illumination aren't that big a deal, but the cutouts are just superfluous.
I prefer the cutouts. Sure, it's rule of cool, but then super spindly pylons irritate me and I'm told that it's uber fancy super tech so why question it!??!?They've kinda grown on me. I can't imagine her without them at this point.
They've kinda grown on me. I can't imagine her without them at this point.
Going by the strict dialogue, Bonaventure should be older than NX-01, not newer. Bonaventure was the "first ship to have warp drive installed".
I take TAS with more than just a grain of salt. Alot of it just flat out doesn't work in the slightest, and was officially not canon for decades. However with the Bonaventure, in my own working out of the Trek chronology, I assumed it was the first true "starship" to have warp drive, in the last 21st century. The Phoenix and the probes and what not had warp drive, but Bonaventure was the first ship with a crew set out to explore.
For that theory to work, it has to be prior to 2069, when Conestoga was launched. I tend to ignore any visuals from TAS, so i'm seeing Bonaventure as a small vessel cobbled together somewhere around 2067 just a few years after the Phoenix flight, probably with some help from the Vulcans. While the Vulcans were trying to keep Earth contained, a diddly little vessel flying around at Warp 1 wasn't really going to have the range to do much of anything, and gives the humans something to rally around.
EDIT -
Just wanted to pop this in here as we talk about the Daedalus. I've put alot of thought into post-ENT era and have a whole slew of theories/headcanons. One such is the origins of "NCC". In my version of events, the Daedalus is actually based on a somewhat older design that never actually made its way into production, designed as a military ship by a now-defunct Earth military (I have it pegged as US Space Force). Starfleet pulled the design out of mothballs, needing something designed for military operations and realized it was an easy ship to build.
(trying to reconcile "old" canon with new), the initial purpose of the Daedalus was essentially as a mobile missile platform. Given they needed huge amounts of ordnance, Earth was unable to manufacture photonic torpedoes at that scale and fitted these vessels with massive amount of old-style nuclear warheads. Being wartime and nobody wanting to get creative with naming, this design was given the simple name of "Nuclear Combat Cruiser", the first to roll of the line being NCC-10 Daedalus. (Mirroring what someone said earlier, the Sphere is the habitation area, the secondary "tube" is mostly taken up as munitions storage/missile launchers)
Much like the NX-Class, the NCC-Class didn't have an official "name" other than its letter designation. At the end of the war, the refit NX-Class became known as "Columbia-Class" after NX-02, the first to receive the refit, and the NCC-Class was dubbed "Daedalus-Class", starting a tradition that would last for centuries.
It was the NCC/Daedalus-Class that projected Earth from minor power to the most powerful fleet in the quadrant, and upon the formation of the Federation, most Starfleet ships would be given a registry beginning with "NCC" in honor of the now-legendary class of starship. (The NX-Class, of course, would also be remembered and honored with experimental or one-of-a-kind vessels receiving the "NX" registry.)
Far simpler perhaps to say the Bonaventure was NAMED for the 'first true ship to have warp drive installed', maybe.
come up with reasons why that tombstone said "James R. Kirk."
Far simpler perhaps to say the Bonaventure was NAMED for the 'first true ship to have warp drive installed', maybe.
Which just happens to align with much of what the novel Federation claimed, about the early warp era, too. Possibly heading up the first interstellar warp flights?
I've also always thought a jump to warp 7 was too fast, for Enterprise. Warp 6 was plenty.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.