No, it doesn't makes it not to okay to beat your child or don't feed it for months you heart less asshole!
It's the same as with a kid or a disabled person, a person might have a "reason" for beating their child or not feeding them for months, but that make it OK.
No, it doesn't makes it not to okay to beat your child or don't feed it for months you heart less asshole!
This is missing my key point: people don't always know how to empathize with animals. They just don't. Yes, I agree it's an owner's responsibility, but that doesn't mean they know it. There is an assumption that empathy is just a spontaneous development for humans, but it actually takes, time, effort and cultivation.The difference is that a lot of domesticated animals are completely reliant on us to survive, so their owner's responsibility to know how to take care of them. It's the same as with a kid or a disabled person, a person might have a "reason" for beating their child or not feeding them for months, but that make it OK.
Yes, it was directed at child abusers. I guess both me JD need to specify our meaning betterSo I just wanted to check in here. Based on the phrasing I’m having difficulty determining if this is a generic response to the thread, or a direct reply to @JD.
It’s clear to me from context that @JD was not advocating for child abuse, and just had an unfortunate typo (accidentally left out a “doesn’t”) that changed the literal reading of the text to the opposite of what he intended.
But I’m having difficulty determining if the reply is just a general agreement of the intended sentiment, and the “heartless asshole” comment is referring to child abusers in general, or if the reply is taking @JD to task for the text as written, and directing the “heartless asshole” comment at him.
If you are calling generic child abusers heartless assholes, then that’s perfectly fine (and you’re right!). However, if you were calling @JD that, then that would be a warning-worthy violation of board rules. You are allowed to argue against what someone has written, but you can’t call them an asshole in this part of the board.
I’m not giving you a warning, because I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt that you ‘re not calling @JD that. But there was enough ambiguity that I wanted to at least say something, because if someone was calling another member an asshole, I couldn’t just let it slide. (And in this case, he wasn’t intending to say anything bad, it was just a simple typing error.)
My apologies if I have misread anything and made this a bigger deal than it needed to be. I just needed to err on the side of caution.
No, it doesn't makes it not to okay to beat your child or don't feed it for months you heart less asshole!
Woops, yeah that was supposed to be doesn't. I went back and edited the post to add the doesn't.So I just wanted to check in here. Based on the phrasing I’m having difficulty determining if this is a generic response to the thread, or a direct reply to @JD.
It’s clear to me from context that @JD was not advocating for child abuse, and just had an unfortunate typo (accidentally left out a “doesn’t”) that changed the literal reading of the text to the opposite of what he intended.
But I’m having difficulty determining if the reply is just a general agreement of the intended sentiment, and the “heartless asshole” comment is referring to child abusers in general, or if the reply is taking @JD to task for the text as written, and directing the “heartless asshole” comment at him.
If you are calling generic child abusers heartless assholes, then that’s perfectly fine (and you’re right!). However, if you were calling @JD that, then that would be a warning-worthy violation of board rules. You are allowed to argue against what someone has written, but you can’t call them an asshole in this part of the board.
I’m not giving you a warning, because I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt that you ‘re not calling @JD that. But there was enough ambiguity that I wanted to at least say something, because if someone was calling another member an asshole, I couldn’t just let it slide. (And in this case, he wasn’t intending to say anything bad, it was just a simple typing error.)
My apologies if I have misread anything and made this a bigger deal than it needed to be. I just needed to err on the side of caution.
I think I might be misunderstanding you here, are you saying not having empathy then that should excuse the behavior? Because it doesn't for me.This is missing my key point: people don't always know how to empathize with animals. They just don't. Yes, I agree it's an owner's responsibility, but that doesn't mean they know it. There is an assumption that empathy is just a spontaneous development for humans, but it actually takes, time, effort and cultivation.
No where am I excusing behavior. I always look for the motivation behind the behavior, not just assuming horrible things because of lack of empathy.I think I might be misunderstanding you here, are you saying not having empathy then that should excuse the behavior? Because it doesn't for me.
Yes, it was directed at child abusers.
OK, that's fair. But once we reach the scale of something like Twist of Fate where Ashley De Felice took thousands of dollars in donations claiming it was to take care of the animals, when it fact she spent it all on herself, and left hundreds of animals with no medical, no food, and no water. And she obviously know what she was doing was wrong because she lied, made sure the literal piles of dead bodies were out sight while she left the healthiest ones on the edge of the property so people would only see them. She also started lying to her friends who also ran sanctuaries and refused to let any of them on the property. When you reach that kind of scale, motivation doesn't matter, you're just a horrible monster.No where am I excusing behavior. I always look for the motivation behind the behavior, not just assuming horrible things because of lack of empathy.
Arthritis pain
Son of a bitch, my hands hurt tonight.
I guess so.When you reach that kind of scale, motivation doesn't matter, you're just a horrible monster.
You're welcome!Thank you for the clarification, I appreciate it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.