• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    185
The biggest thing we see clearly is her new costume, which has a bit of a military, special forces look to it.


Not that different from the concept art posted

95QD11U.jpg
 
I don't really want the worst actor of the absolute worst live action Marvel show ever made to come back, but maybe if its a multiverse thing and his dies quickly and/or in a hilarious way I could accept it. We did get to see Anson Mount come back as Black Bolt for a cameo like that, and that was enjoyable.

Seriously, what a monkey's paw wish it would be for all the people who were wishing for more Netflix Marvel character returns after Daredevil/Charlie Cox, only for the returning character to be Iron Fist :lol:
 
I don't really want the worst actor of the absolute worst live action Marvel show ever made to come back, but maybe if its a multiverse thing and his dies quickly and/or in a hilarious way I could accept it. We did get to see Anson Mount come back as Black Bolt for a cameo like that, and that was enjoyable.

Seriously, what a monkey's paw wish it would be for all the people who were wishing for more Netflix Marvel character returns after Daredevil/Charlie Cox, only for the returning character to be Iron Fist :lol:
You claim Iron Fist is the worst live action Marvel show in the same post that you refer to The Inhumans? ;)
 
I don't see a recent Marvel comics thread so I'll throw this here: just read Spectacular Spider-Men #1 and it was great. It feels like a return to classic Spidey greatness from this mediocre run we've had on ASM. Great pacing, good art, great quipping, and avoiding the pitfalls of writing for the trade: I recommend it, even to people who haven't read Spidey comics before, because it feels like a great onboarding point, too.
 
A late post in support how how good Echo was. Relatively quiet, downscale and subtle for a Marvel show about supernatural powers and I was engaged throughout the entire show. Graham Greene was my favorite part of the series but Vincent D'Onofrio's guarded and sympathetic portrayal of Kingpin helped elevate the show to something even better. It was a MCU show I'd been longing for - a hero with powers but more down-to-earth in the execution. I wish we got more like it.
 
I think it pretty obvious that any blame for the quality of both Inhumans and Iron Fist season 1 lay at the feet of the showrunner for both shows, Scott Buck (who was also showrunner for the much derided final season of Dexter). When someone's two Marvel credits are considered two of the worst Marvel products, it seems disingenuous at best to point the finger at the lead actor for the quality of the final product. In that regard, blaming Finn Jones for the quality of Iron Fist season 1 would be akin to blaming the quality of Inhumans on Anson Mount.

Also, Jones had next to zero time to actually prepare for the role. He literally got on a plane after his last day on Game of Thrones, flew to New York, and started filming Iron Fist without any real prep time and zero fight training. And as noted by others, his performance in not only season 2 of his own show, but also in Defenders and Luke Cage show a marked improvement.

For my own part, I think the Netflix shows squandered the potential of the Power Man and Iron Fist duo. I would love to see that potential fulfilled (Along with Daughters of the Dragon as well, of course). So, I say bring on Finn Jones.
 
Last edited:
You claim Iron Fist is the worst live action Marvel show in the same post that you refer to The Inhumans? ;)

I stand by that, if for no other reason then even without speaking Anson Mount is a more charismatic actor then Finn Jones, actually pretty much every Inhuman actor does more with the terrible material that they're given then Finn Jones does.

Likewise The Defenders.

I still think that Defenders was awful. The whole plot was stupid, and they did everything they could to have as little actual crossover or teamwork between the characters as possible. Daredevil has quit being a superhero (again) at the start, there are no actual supervillains at any point (no, the Netflix serial killer version of Elektra doesn't count), and for some reason Sigourney Weaver is there doing nothing but getting a paycheck. The action was cheap and stuck to the boring "grounded" Netflix style, which meant that Daredevil gets a few good action bits but everyone else is so nerfed they're basically not even superhumans. Did you know that Luke Cage can lift and throw bulldozers at people in the comics? That kind of power would be fun to see, but no fun is allowed in the Marvel Netflix shows, only second rate Nolan style "grounded" BS, while even the cheapest Arrowverse show had more fun/nicer looking action on a weekly basis then anything in the non-Daredevil parts of the Netflix Marvel Universe.
 
For my own part, I think the Netflix shows squandered the potential of the Power Man and Iron Fist duo. I would love to see that potential fulfilled (Along with Daughters of the Dragon as well, of course). So, I say bring on Finn Jones.

I agree that Finn Jones doesn't deserve the flak he gets for Iron Fist. I would love to see him continue in the role alongside Mike Colter and Krysten Ritter. I also think that a "Heroes for Hire" series or, better yet, movie could be great. Imagine Luke, Danny, Colleen and Misty together--maybe even alongside some other Heroes for Hire we've already seen such as the Black Knight, Shang-Chi, She-Hulk and Ant-Man. There's your new Avenger franchise right there. I'd much prefer to see that than the Thunderbolts.
 
No, they weren't. People talked about the Nielson ratings but never posted any valid links. It was fake stuff using a name people wouldn't think to check

Lol. What are you even talking about?

You can see the Neilson Ratings for yourself. They are posted.

They prove everything I've said.

Marvels was an underperformer on streaming as well. Couldn't even make the Overall Top Ten.

mce2.png


djdj233.png


And if you think the images have been faked, all the numbers are here:

https://www.nielsen.com/data-center/top-ten/#television

Looks like The Marvels dropped off the 'Movies' chart almost immediately as well.

djdj233.png


So audiences really have spoken regarding The Marvels. There's no way to spin it positively.

They literally didn't. They were consistent.

For Echo?

Nah man. It dropped like a stone after one week. Which is terrible for a multiple-episode launch.

Gone off the charts a week after it's debut. Audiences tried it, and peaced out. Poor word of mouth.

djdj233.png


People who actually analyzed the show.

Name them. Let's see.


Tell that to Captain America and Thor, whose first movies really didn't make much money to warrant sequels...or Blade Runner, which bombed and still got a sequel. Or the Thing 1982 which bombed and got a sequel and other media expansions. Or The Shining which got a sequel in Dr Sleep.

Lol. Apples and Oranges. None of those films were on the same budget scale as this, they were mid-budget compared to where we are now.

And Cap and Thor still had positive ROI (return on investment), due to their lower budgets.

Only 'Incredible Hulk' didn't make enough money to justify it's production/marketing costs.

He never said that, he just said they weren't doing sequels immediately.
No, not really. That may be the Rep he's given but he's not an MCU Defender nor some special VIP.
Not really, at all. They haven't had major failures either (including the Marvels, as it was quickly vindicated on Streaming). Anyone who enjoyed Winter Soldier or things like "The Boys" or "Invincible" has no right to complain about politics in stories.
Clickbait title. In there, Iger actually says the writers have the right to free speech. Including their "messages", that all stories have always had.
Try again.

Nope. And this is from CNBC, left-learning media outlet.

Iger said:

“Creators lost sight of what their No. 1 objective needed to be,” Iger said at the DealBook Summit in New York on Wednesday. “We have to entertain first. It’s not about messages.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/30/dis...ovies-have-been-too-focused-on-messaging.html

Doesn't get more clear that that.

He was saying what many influential shareholders wanted to hear.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top