Yeah. BAD. I don't how they're going to get her from here to there but I'm looking forward to seeing it play out. If I'm still alive by the time they get anywhere near it.But someone still had to die.
Yeah. BAD. I don't how they're going to get her from here to there but I'm looking forward to seeing it play out. If I'm still alive by the time they get anywhere near it.But someone still had to die.
Maybe she has arthritis, and that's why she can't point farr.Didn't T'Pol also suffer side effects from Point Farr? If splitting up didn't break the telepathic bond, T'Pring might also have been suffering emotionally but hid it well. She just managed to determine a logical way out.
With a judgy death stare like that, she doesn't need to point. Oh lol. I now see autospell hates Vulcan culture.Maybe she has arthritis, and that's why she can't point farr.
![]()
I think it comes down to her deciding she was going to serve herself entirely. Spock's hesitancy made it clear he was not dedicated enough to their relationship.Yeah. BAD. I don't how they're going to get her from here to there but I'm looking forward to seeing it play out. If I'm still alive by the time they get anywhere near it.
Agreed.Nah. The whole "cowboy" thing never made sense to me. Especially in TOS.
I don't expect that any of these characters will ever turn into the TOS stiffs.
"Less noble" is one thing. "Willing to make a man kill his best friend purely out of spite" is orders of magnitude away from that, and from the way SNW has developed her as a character. It's an unintended contradiction that they evidently didn't think through.
I think he might mean Chapel, who's TOS incarnation makes watching paint dry exciting.Stiffs? You mean the guys who ended every episode with a joke? The guys that coined the term "mechanical rice picker"? The guys who defeated an advanced invading species by essentially drinking them under the table? You call those guys stiff?
I think he might mean Chapel, who's TOS incarnation makes watching paint dry exciting.
I think we'll have to agree to different interpretations on that. Killing an innocent bystander to get what she wants is pretty horrible regardless of motivations.
On the contrary, her motive makes all the difference. Or rather, her options make all the difference. By analogy, self-defense is only admissible as a legal defense against murder charges if the defendant had no alternatives. If killing is the only way to escape an intolerable situation, the law may forgive that. But if there was a nonlethal way to deal with the situation, then the law will not forgive choosing to kill anyway.
That's why the critical question all along has been whether there's another way to get out of the marriage. If demanding kal-if-fee was the only possible option T'Pring had, then the ultimate fault is not hers, it's the system's for making that her only way out. By showing that it's ridiculously easy to break the engagement, "The Serene Squall" changed the equation completely and shifted the fault entirely to T'Pring for insisting on a completely unnecessary deathmatch.
Even the sexAt this point it's clear that T'Pring has been willing to put far more into thus relationship than Spock,
Yeah. She pretty much nails it in her "let's take a break" speech.Even the sex![]()
Again. There is a long way to go from here to there. We don't know what happens to her, why she changes, why she is so coldly and logically ruthless during Amok Time.
Maybe they can break the betrothal easily before because there wasn't the biological imperative of pon farr. Because of that there is no simple (if painful) agreement to end things between two logical people.
And it is ruthless.
I thought of that ages ago but rejected it, because if that were the case, why wait until it was too late? T'Pring was with Stonn for quite some time before the pon farr happened. If she knew there was a risk she could be trapped into this if she waited too long, then it's illogical for her not to act sooner and avoid it, and if there's one thing T'Pring has never been portrayed as, it's illogical.
I thought of that ages ago but rejected it, because if that were the case, why wait until it was too late? T'Pring was with Stonn for quite some time before the pon farr happened. If she knew there was a risk she could be trapped into this if she waited too long, then it's illogical for her not to act sooner and avoid it, and if there's one thing T'Pring has never been portrayed as, it's illogical
Exactly so. And, again, T'Pring is interested in Spock until he becomes a legend and that becomes unacceptable to her.Why does she wait until it's too late? Maybe it is just viciousness. Maybe you're right and the writers messed up. That's what I'm excited to learn (from a storytelling perspective). But to me, the fact SNW brought in T'Pring at all makes me think they've got something in mind that will provide an answer.
On the contrary, her motive makes all the difference. Or rather, her options make all the difference. By analogy, self-defense is only admissible as a legal defense against murder charges if the defendant had no alternatives. If killing is the only way to escape an intolerable situation, the law may forgive that. But if there was a nonlethal way to deal with the situation, then the law will not forgive choosing to kill anyway.
That's why the critical question all along has been whether there's another way to get out of the marriage. If demanding kal-if-fee was the only possible option T'Pring had, then the ultimate fault is not hers, it's the system's for making that her only way out. By showing that it's ridiculously easy to break the engagement, "The Serene Squall" changed the equation completely and shifted the fault entirely to T'Pring for insisting on a completely unnecessary deathmatch.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.