• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News The ongoing next Star Trek movie thread

What does that mean?

That they're a garbage investment, they're not likely to ever pay their existing creditors, anyone who buys the debt will likely never get it back, and existing creditors should sell off whatever they can to anyone still willing to take the risk.
 
That they're a garbage investment, they're not likely to ever pay their existing creditors, anyone who buys the debt will likely never get it back, and existing creditors should sell off whatever they can to anyone still willing to take the risk.
Interesting. Didn't find the S&P rating system to include "Junk" in their descriptors.
 
Interesting. Didn't find the S&P rating system to include "Junk" in their descriptors.
It's not their official name, but this indicates ratings of BB and below are considered "junk":

junk-rating.png

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/052202.asp#:~:text=Junk bonds have a lower,will default on the debt.

From @wayoung 's linked article:


S&P Global on Feb. 23 placed Paramount Global on “credit watch negative.” The firm explained that it took the action after it introduced cash-flow metrics (along with existing leverage metrics) into its ratings methodology.

Previously, the firm had a “BBB-” rating on the company, its lowest investment-grade rating. With the change Wednesday, S&P now has a issuer credit rating on Paramount Global and its senior unsecured debt of of “BB+,” which is the “highest speculative-grade by market participants.” At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on Paramount Global’s junior subordinated debt to “BB-” from “BB” and its short-term rating to “B” from “A-3.”


It seems they've reduced Paramount Global's rating to a point just below "investment grade". It's not the worst junk rating, but it puts Paramount on notice that they'll want to take steps to improve, and soon.
 
Last edited:
It's not their official name, but this indicates ratings of BB and below are considered "junk":

View attachment 39090

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/052202.asp#:~:text=Junk bonds have a lower,will default on the debt.

From @wayoung 's linked article:


S&P Global on Feb. 23 placed Paramount Global on “credit watch negative.” The firm explained that it took the action after it introduced cash-flow metrics (along with existing leverage metrics) into its ratings methodology.

Previously, the firm had a “BBB-” rating on the company, its lowest investment-grade rating. With the change Wednesday, S&P now has a issuer credit rating on Paramount Global and its senior unsecured debt of of “BB+,” which is the “highest speculative-grade by market participants.” At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on Paramount Global’s junior subordinated debt to “BB-” from “BB” and its short-term rating to “B” from “A-3.”

Thank you. That clarifies things very, very, well. Much appreciated!
 
I didn't actually click on it. I thought TT was posting it as legit.
I clicked on it. The title on the page does have [April Fool's Day] at the end of it.

As stated above, though, one might be forgiven for giving it a straight read -- it's not significantly out of line with the progression of increasingly-hard-to-believe announcements concerning "the NEW Star Trek 4" we've all been reading over the last several years.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top