This question came to mind while reading some news stories.
Suppose that today, IRL, you work in some organization, civilian (a company) or military (army, navy etc). It turns out that on a co-worker's work computer or smartphone he has AI-made and deepfake porn films starring him and his colleagues and superiors. And not only are there sex scenes, but also sequences where his superiors are humiliated.
Now, in the worst case scenario he would be fired immediately. Best case, transferred. Because even if he were "forgiven", colleagues would simply be uncomfortable working with him. Given that what was considered science fiction is now possible and attitudes towards some issues have changed, I find it difficult to think that if Hollow Pursuit were written today Barclay would remain on the Enterprise. The best outcome for him that I can think of would be that the fact would not be mentioned on his personnel file and in exchange he would immediately request a transfer and follow a re-education and therapeutic course. Because otherwise it would give the impression that the writers "condoned" these types of behaviors.
What do you think?
Suppose that today, IRL, you work in some organization, civilian (a company) or military (army, navy etc). It turns out that on a co-worker's work computer or smartphone he has AI-made and deepfake porn films starring him and his colleagues and superiors. And not only are there sex scenes, but also sequences where his superiors are humiliated.
Now, in the worst case scenario he would be fired immediately. Best case, transferred. Because even if he were "forgiven", colleagues would simply be uncomfortable working with him. Given that what was considered science fiction is now possible and attitudes towards some issues have changed, I find it difficult to think that if Hollow Pursuit were written today Barclay would remain on the Enterprise. The best outcome for him that I can think of would be that the fact would not be mentioned on his personnel file and in exchange he would immediately request a transfer and follow a re-education and therapeutic course. Because otherwise it would give the impression that the writers "condoned" these types of behaviors.
What do you think?