What do you mean "supposed to have", Sulu? With all indications he was going to be Captain of that ship (cut scene, novelization), and eventually was (ST6). How can you not know the specifications of your ship, the type of drive really
What do you mean "supposed to have", Sulu? With all indications he was going to be Captain of that ship (cut scene, novelization), and eventually was (ST6). How can you not know the specifications of your ship, the type of drive really
Classified.What do you mean "supposed to have", Sulu? With all indications he was going to be Captain of that ship (cut scene, novelization), and eventually was (ST6). How can you not know the specifications of your ship, the type of drive really
Well it was apparently never tested. Starfleet invested a fortune in an all new class of ship to power this amazing transwarp drive and... it didn't work?
Like, no prototypes or proof of concept tests. Just a giant super star ship.
"It'll work bro, trust me."
Well it was apparently never tested. Starfleet invested a fortune in an all new class of ship to power this amazing transwarp drive and... it didn't work?
Like, no prototypes or proof of concept tests. Just a giant super star ship.
"It'll work bro, trust me."
Well it was apparently never tested. Starfleet invested a fortune in an all new class of ship to power this amazing transwarp drive and... it didn't work?
Like, no prototypes or proof of concept tests. Just a giant super star ship.
"It'll work bro, trust me."
AFAIK, that's still just fanon, but it's as good an explanation as any, and it would work for me.sure it did, that's why the TNG warp scale is different
sure it did, that's why the TNG warp scale is different. besides, something working in a smaller scale test still could have surprises at full scale, hence still an experiment.
The same one as in previous Treks--the speed of plot scale.I don't know what one SNW & Disco use. I'm sure someone here will say.
but then ENT had to go and use the new scale. I
how would we know? they never got fast enough to tell the difference.
We have no idea.Well it was apparently never tested. Starfleet invested a fortune in an all new class of ship to power this amazing transwarp drive and... it didn't work?
Like, no prototypes or proof of concept tests. Just a giant super star ship.
"It'll work bro, trust me."
That's kind of what the TNG Technical Manual implied at the end. It suggested that although the initial attempt to break the "transwarp barrier" in the 23rd-century was unsuccessful, it did lead to improved warp engine technology for later starships, including ultimately the Galaxy-class. Perhaps those improved warp engines prompted a redrawn warp scale in the 24th-Century.Was it ever said on screen that the "Great Experiment" failed? Only the TNG Tech Manual said so, and that book is hardly canon. And as others have pointed out, at some point warp factors were re-scaled, implying there had been a new development in warp drive. The Excelsior's warp drive would work well as that new development.
Maybe the designer wasn't starfleet, or was horrible at managing people. Scott is a miracle worker who has experience with multiple technologies including alien tech, and can fix stuff on the fly. Doesn't seem too crazy to put someone with Scotty's background in charge of the starfleet staff in that ship's engineering section. Especially if there were other specialists that had been involved in the design on board too, but that just weren't command material.Judging by its Security Division, Starfleet doesn't exactly have it together.
The other thing that bothered me was Scott being made the captain of Engineering on an experimental craft.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.