Would it be controversial if I said that Kirk's fate in 'Generations' was kind of dumb and some timeline needs to bring him back.
Shatner's Kirk, let's see it, again.
Shatner's Kirk, let's see it, again.
I always thought his final fate was dumb. I'm not totally onboard with what Picard Season 3 did either (S31 having Kirk's body), but it did make me want to see Shatner's Kirk again. Plus, it'll piss off whoever's against it. So, to quote Kirk in Generations, "Sounds like fun!"Would it be controversial if I said that Kirk's fate in 'Generations' was kind of dumb and some timeline needs to bring him back.
Shatner's Kirk, let's see it, again.
Then people who want Shatner's Kirk back better learn to like Terry Trek, because that's where it's most likely to happen.@Lord Garth, none of us is getting any younger and Shatner is not a young man anymore.
While William Shatner is still with us, now is the time to do something if someone wants to bring back the original Kirk.
It was dumb.Would it be controversial if I said that Kirk's fate in 'Generations' was kind of dumb and some timeline needs to bring him back.
Shatner's Kirk, let's see it, again.
I'd argue the eyeball ripping "Stardust City Rag" from PICARD (Season 1 of course) is far worse.
Yeah, it's a deeply unsettling episode. It just ends. It's closer to the nihilism that newer Trek is accused of being than new Trek actually is.I detest Course: Oblivion. It’s arguably the most cynical, bad taste episode of Star Trek ever made. The whole premise is simply seeing the main characters suffer horribly and die; not a sliver of hope. It’s just a horrible, nasty episode with no point other than to show suffering. If I’d been a Paramount executive I’d have fired the entire writing staff of that show several times over.
Do a cold open of a Kelvinverse version of The Deadly Years for the first 15 minutes and have Shatner solve the problem before being cured. Not just a cameo, saves the day as the hero, and gets it done upfront so the rest of the story is unencumbered. Easy peasy.It was dumb.
I have no idea how to bring him back.
The whole premise is simply seeing the main characters suffer horribly and die; not a sliver of hope.
Well, I don't hate it.Do a cold open of a Kelvinverse version of The Deadly Years for the first 15 minutes and have Shatner solve the problem before being cured. Not just a cameo, saves the day as the hero, and gets it done upfront so the rest of the story is unencumbered. Easy peasy.
There are even deleted Q scenes on the Blu-ray. More Q should have been a no brainer, especially as a lot of padding was needed. Also reshoot the scene in "Penance" where Q is very angry with Picard, which was likely a cut off plot branch.
- Season 2 was hyped up as a Q-centric season, but I felt Q was largely tangential to the entire thing. It felt more like an extended cameo for John de Lancie than actually having him and Q be a central part of the season. To me, Brent Spiner's nth version of the Soong family was more involved in the story than Q.
Raffi making stupid decisions because the plot demands it is the literal starting point for the whole season going off the rails.
- Part of the problem is how unfocused things get once they're in 2024. They try to give all of the characters subplots, but some of them depend on characters doing stupid things to create drama in order to stretch the story out over 10 episodes. To me, Raffi's grief and anger about Elnor become just a bit too much when everyone is trying to focus in order to save existence itself.
Because originally Confederation Laris was supposed to travel back to the past with Picard and gang, but executive interference nixed it. Maybe the opening credits regular contract was already signed though, and they had to improvise?
- Why does Tallinn look and sound like Laris? I still don't understand that.
I mean, saving existence itself would be pretty overwhelming. Focusing on a single death would make sense.To me, Raffi's grief and anger about Elnor become just a bit too much when everyone is trying to focus in order to save existence itself.
A Star Trek movie. I don’t know in what form, but I would bet money on it versus The Winds of Winter. Paramount will probably, at the very least, want a film released for the 60th anniversary.So, which one will come out first: the next Star Trek movie or The Winds of Winter?
TV Movies don't count.
Way back in the day I wasn't going to give the book series a try until each installment had already been published. I think I saved myself some grief on that one.So, which one will come out first: the next Star Trek movie or The Winds of Winter?
TV Movies don't count.
I've re-watched it. I liked it (as we know), but it's still my least favorite season of the three. I noticed some things that make the season make more sense, but I didn't catch them until re-watch and I thought they should've put more focus on those.Has anybody rewatched s2 of Picard? Does it hold together better on the rewatch or is it still a mess of broken down plotting?
Yeah, I re-watched it before S3. And if anything I think it got worse and just increased my dislike for it.Has anybody rewatched s2 of Picard? Does it hold together better on the rewatch or is it still a mess of broken down plotting?
Has anybody rewatched s2 of Picard? Does it hold together better on the rewatch or is it still a mess of broken down plotting?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.