• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

I was meaning the Stargazer guest-starring in a show following the Enterprise-C, but you know what, I like the idea. And frankly we have enough Enterprises and prides-of-the-fleet ships. About time we had a show set on a ship that was "an overworked, underpowered vessel, always on the verge of flying apart at the seams"; a ship that survives on its wits rather than its sheer firepower or unique fungus-powered engines...

In a way, I suppose DS9 was a bit like that, when it began. Understaffed, underequipped, some of its tech seriously below spec compared to Federation standards. It just didn't stay that way when the station became more and more important. Except, that it wasn't a ship but a station.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
And for much of Season 1 those who said it were kinda right. :lol:
C5rFgSB.gif
 
Utopias aren't interesting. The interesting bits happen at the frayed edges where the utopia butts up against non-utopias. Look at the Culture novels of Iain M Banks.
I understand.

But given the ongoing laments against the supposedly anti utopian attitude of current Trek productions this idea amuses me to no end.
 
I understand.

But given the ongoing laments against the supposedly anti utopian attitude of current Trek productions this idea amuses me to no end.

But many of classic Trek's finest instalments are about that utopian vision getting rattled and having to justify itself. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. "The Best of Both Worlds" ("Will this be the end of our civilisation? Turn the page"). The threat of being drawn into the quagmire of a Klingon civil war in "Redemption". The Maquis. The entire Dominion War. "Earth is a paradise", we are told, at least by the 24th century. Which is precisely why we spend such little time there and instead out on the frontier, except when that paradise is under threat, or is being contrasted in some way.
 
But many of classic Trek's finest instalments are about that utopian vision getting rattled and having to justify itself. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. "The Best of Both Worlds" ("Will this be the end of our civilisation? Turn the page"). The threat of being drawn into the quagmire of a Klingon civil war in "Redemption". The Maquis. The entire Dominion War. "Earth is a paradise", we are told, at least by the 24th century. Which is precisely why we spend such little time there and instead out on the frontier, except when that paradise is under threat, or is being contrasted in some way.
Agreed.

It makes it more interesting to explore all facets of human drama.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top