I assume it was to show how powerful Nomad was.
Non-Sequitor!
I assume it was to show how powerful Nomad was.
They got Leslie clones stacked like cord wood in the cargo bay.Lt Leslie for sure. He got Khan blood off camera.
They got Leslie clones stacked like cord wood in the cargo bay.
Talking costs extra.They don't talk much, do they?
Sarek : Kirk, I thank you. What you have done is...
Kirk : What I have done, I had to do.
Sarek : But at what cost? Your ship. Your son.
Kirk : If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul.The Voyage Home has Spock learning that there’s a “human thing to do” which can be a balance, when he advocated saving Chekhov.
There's no version of this where Kirk's losing David meant anything to him. He fell of his chair and then the grieving was immediately over. I love the classic movies to bits but David is treated horribly.Those only demonstrate Bennet's writing is lightyears ahead of JJ Abrams' and whoever wrote PIC's writing
There's no version of this where Kirk's losing David meant anything to him. He fell of his chair and then the grieving was immediately over. I love the classic movies to bits but David is treated horribly.
There's also the fact that we never see what Kirk's "pain" is in The Final Frontier. I always thought it interesting that Shatner left it a mystery, but you could argue that it could have been David, or the life of being a father with a family that he gave up to be in Starfleet."I've never trusted Klingons, and I never will. I can never forgive them for the death of my boy."
He says the words but do you actually see any mourning beyond that first scene where it happens?"I've never trusted Klingons, and I never will. I can never forgive them for the death of my boy."
Death only carries as much impact as the story requires it.He says the words but do you actually see any mourning beyond that first scene where it happens?
"I had a brother once..." poor Sam fares even worse.
He says the words but do you actually see any mourning beyond that first scene where it happens?
"I had a brother once..." poor Sam fares even worse.
I know he watched a lot of ( maybe all) the episodes looking for a "hook", but I don't know if enough stuck to call him well versed.Well, we don't know that Kirk forgot he had a brother. Harve Bennet was well versed in the series and I tend to believe that Kirk was flipping the script.
I'm not inclined towards leeway for mistakes just because of references.Why shouldn't he? He did a great job reviving the series and it's obvious he did his research. There's some pretty obscure references peppered throughout his movies.
Look at it this way, if Berman made a similar mistake in the 90s or early 2000s, or Braga did fans would be crying fowl and demanding they be put on trial. If Kurtzman made such a mistake today, fans would want him fired for real.Why shouldn't he? He did a great job reviving the series and it's obvious he did his research. There's some pretty obscure references peppered throughout his movies.
SFS is the only one he has sole writing credit for. So I would be curious which "obscure" references can be attributed to him and not his co-writers or other people in the production.Why shouldn't he? He did a great job reviving the series and it's obvious he did his research. There's some pretty obscure references peppered throughout his movies.
Michael Burnham has shown us that fans hate it when their heroes cry over anything!As for Kirk mourning David, what did you want? Ongoing tears? He cried between movies and carried that resentment all the way to the last act of the final film. David was remembered just fine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.