• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Megaphasers

Unicron

Additional Pylon
Moderator
So in recently looking at my ship library, I've started to wonder about where the concept of megaphasers came from. I've mainly seen it referenced in the Ships of the Starfleet series and Jackill's books. But I'm curious to know if anyone has more information on where the idea came from?

Mechanically speaking, my basic understanding is that the megaphasers draw more power from the warp core to create a much stronger phaser pulse than a traditional bank, and in a few classes have been used as an alternative to photon torpedo systems. The pulse phasers designed for the Defiant are able to put more destructive power into their bursts by releasing them as pulses instead of a traditional beam, but with the disadvantage of having less range because they dissipate more quickly. Not a huge problem with the Defiant's mobility. :D

It was mentioned in some other discussions that the phaser pods designed for the Reliant have what looks like two middle banks, which might be the source of the phasers used in the initial strike on the Enterprise. It's kind of hard to judge, but I personally have come to like that idea since they don't seem to line up with the forward emitters. I've noted that many offscreen sources either omit these details or don't seem to see them as extra banks, with the Excelsior family variants in Jackill's having a different model of turret.

MmD9tFB.jpg


zUkmuU3.png


Setting aside the idea of these being specifically megaphasers for a minute, I also like the idea that they could be a more powerful form of standard bank for use on frigates and tactical designs.

The Excelsior model also has the interesting mounts on the upper neck, which look like they could be phaser cannons or torpedo launchers. But since the saucer bottom would interfere with their firing arc, I'm honestly not sure what the original design intent was. My personal working theory is that they may be tractor beams or sensor pallets, perhaps something modular that could be swapped out as needed.

3EWLOdi.jpg


to6P4IB.jpg
 
Like the TTA Hornet with horn like laser lances mounted pointing a bit upward.
The Hornet begins a dive…the lances now point forward… and fire.

Excelsior can make a sweeping, slashing attack by turning.
 
So in recently looking at my ship library, I've started to wonder about where the concept of megaphasers came from. I've mainly seen it referenced in the Ships of the Starfleet series and Jackill's books. But I'm curious to know if anyone has more information on where the idea came from?
pretty sure you just identified where the idea came from. the fan made Ships of starfleet and Jackill's books. those books were rife with excessive speculation of the sort, with a trend to both identify everything as highly militarized and identifying anything even remotely gun shaped as a phaser or disruptor of some sort.

since they came out during a time when new canon material was very thin on the ground, the fandom embraced them fairly heavily, and the fact the books present themselves in such a professional looking fashion has confused a lot of people since.
 
Yeah, @mithril is correct, I first remember "mega-phaser" in the from original Avenger (Miranda) class blueprints from 1983. The idea seemed to take hold in fandom that the phasers in Reliant's rollbar were more powerful mega-phaser cannons, even though didn't seem to be the case in TWOK and has never been supported by any other canon sources.
 
We never did see Reliant fire the standard phaser banks…one could say their internals were removed for labs?

Each roll bar may have different fittings.
Weapons (Reliant’s did seem a bit more energetic) tractor beams…
 
Yeah, @mithril is correct, I first remember "mega-phaser" in the from original Avenger (Miranda) class blueprints from 1983. The idea seemed to take hold in fandom that the phasers in Reliant's rollbar were more powerful mega-phaser cannons, even though didn't seem to be the case in TWOK and has never been supported by any other canon sources.

Yes, I came up with the term for those plans and it was subsequently used in the other publications I was involved with (and that mithril holds in such high esteem).

To paraphrase myself from another thread, the original idea for the megaphaser was that it was rated at a million joules, which quickly got trashed, because I had no idea how much damage a million joules could really do. So it was rated at a million undefined units (that iirc were purposely never defined beyond being about ten times the rating of a turret).

While being fan-created and non-canon, it wasn’t some mindlessly conjured hyperbolic term. It was supposed to have functional meaning. Relative to a multidirectional ball turret, a megaphaser was a cannon, narrowly aimable, that could channel power that would otherwise go unused unless multiple turrets were firing at once. The ship might have x amount of energy available for phasers, but the limit of a single turret might be a small fraction of that - 1/10x. The cannon would expand the ability of the ship to deliver its total power available to weapons in one x-powered salvo.

I meant it to very much distinguish between Reliant’s foreboding potential, and Enterprise’s. In my view, Reliant was the more powerful warship, but had inexperienced people running her. It was immediately damaged in the first exchange and lost its ability to channel all its power into those cannons, and was thus put on a more even footing with Enterprise.

My “trend to … identify everything as highly militarized” was confined to a particular part of the Star Fleet I envisioned- the operating forces -in contrast to the “exploratory command” that we were watching most of the time in TOS. This was how I tried to stay true to Roddenberry’s vision of a “combined service” that at one and the same time could portray itself as representing non-interference and peace-loving cooperation, and wage interstellar war.

But as mithril implies, it was just some fan-created bullshit that for some inexplicable reason people are still discussing forty years later. Who woulda thunk? Give it no mind.
 
Last edited:
The term "megaphasers" implies the existence of kilophasers, gigaphasers, & teraphasers....but also milliphasers, microphasers, & nanophasers.
By that extension Google implies a smaller search engine named Billion. The iPod Nano implies an iPod Micro. Etc.
 
The term "megaphasers" implies the existence of kilophasers, gigaphasers, & teraphasers....but also milliphasers, microphasers, & nanophasers.

If you have a “gun” that can shoot one bullet at a time, and you have a ”machine gun” that can shoot many bullets in rapid succession, the single shot weapon is called “gun” and the modified weapon gets the modifier. It isn’t “machine gun” and “non machine gun”, though if you want to be precise, you might say “single shot weapon”. So yes, a type 1 phaser might in fact technically be your “nano phaser” but just doesn’t get called by that name.

The megaphaser requires the modifier because of its special purpose. It delivers all the power allotted to weaponry in one beam. That implies a brief moment in which the weapons systems have to be recharged. The mere fact of that tactical calculation would require it not be fired indiscriminately, and demand terms to single out its function.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I came up with the term for those plans and it was subsequently used in the other publications I was involved with (and that mithril holds in such high esteem).
they're very good works and for the time, fairly reasonable. i've just gotten tired of having to explain to people who've joined the fandom more recently that regardless of how professional they look, they're fan made, made some time back, and that we've gotten decades of shows since they came out that contradicts the stuff in them. the number of people i've met that complain about events or details in canon being 'wrong' while citing those books has left me a little jaded about them.
 
FWIW, 'mega' also means 'great, large, mighty'. Like in 'megaphone', from the Greek for 'great voice'.
 
The term "megaphasers" implies the existence of kilophasers, gigaphasers, & teraphasers....but also milliphasers, microphasers, & nanophasers.
I prefer the Metric-Prefix to Phaser Power classifications.

It makes things easy to understand =D
 
See, this guy gets dumb jokes.
The funny thing is, I'm not treating it as a joke.
I really want to use Metric Pre-fix to categorize Phaser Power.
I'm 100% serious about it too.

I've had that Metric Pre-fix setup for my Phasers in my 26th century Head Canon for a long time.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top