This is the logic you want people to embrace, so that you can pay them peanuts and profit. It seems to be working.
Then the other PR move you use is to complain unemployment insurance is too high. That people will become lazy and won’t work. What you really want to do is push down wages to make more profit.
And Americans fall for these stupid narratives all day long, so the less than 1% can live like kings.
First off, I have never said that people should be paid peanuts. Everyone should be paid fairly, and that includes the people NOT on strike.
Second, I never said anything about people 'becoming lazy and not working'. Quite the opposite... I know all those people
want to get back to work so they can pay their bills and take care of their families.
If you look at my previous posts on this very thread, my issue with strikes has been and always wil be the people the strikes affect that
ARE NOT the intended targets of the strikes... in other words, it hurts a lot more people in the trenches doing other jobs like the ones I listed above and not the executives and studios.
I've never liked rich people... I've dealt with entitled people and well off people a vast majority of my life. As someone who has been working class his entire life, I'm always against the rich.
But it's easy to be on your moral high horse when you aren't part of a group that can't pay their mortgage/rent or utilities or feed your children because one part of the workforce of a show (and quite honestly, going by simple numbers, a small group vs. the amount of all the other working people on a show) causes your livelihood to completely stop and therefore get
no income. And we are in the
fifth month of strikes, so that means a lot of those people have had no income to take care of those necessities and their kids for all that time.
You think that's fair?