Remember, we never saw most of Mel's adventures with the Sixth Doctor. We met her in a flashfoward from the Doctor's future, after she'd been traveling with him for a while, and then Baker was fired so we never got to see the story where they met. So they could've had any number of adventures offscreen (and the audios, novels, and comics have certainly given them plenty, as well as giving Six multiple other companions in the period after "Trial of a Time Lord" and before Mel first met him from her perspective).
Very true. Peri and the 5th Doctor definitely had as well, and what transpired between "seasons 23 and 24" could have led Mel to become more questioning of her desires to travel and resigned to screaming...
One thing dawned on me; the solstice may not have been an issue, if the Rani was figuring other star positions, relative mass, temperatures, and other factors where - if the asteroid was too far away from a planet, and so on - it would be useless. That may have been P&J's idea. The comedy, maxims, and spoons were not (JNT wanting the maxims and, IMHO, he wasn't wrong. At least for a while. McCoy makes them work, and they are a nice contrast to when the 6th Doctor said them verbatim...)
According to Pip & Jane Baker's novelization of their script, "Assaulted by the dissonant bedlam, propelled violently from side to side by the giddy oscillations, Mel collapsed near her overturned exercise bike shortly before the Doctor spun reeling, head first, into the plinth of the console." So he was mortally injured by severe head trauma.
Definitely a word salad... I usually liked going to the dictionary to read up on the words, but the times they went overboard still show. I vague recall their using "buffeted" and "tumult" as well. The latter isn't exactly dreadful, but too many people have ingrained 'buffet" regarding stuffing one's digestive tract with excessive amounts of food, rather than being bandied back and forth like one of those little balls in that Fischer Price popcorn mower toddler device thing...
But it must have been far worse than Mel just landing *plop* onto the floor... wouldn't be pleasant, either way. I love how some of the novels from the 1990s found a way to set the stage for 6 to start a regeneration process. I vaguely recall two... "Spiral Scratch" was one of the novels... I think "Killing Game" was another? Vague memories, but I loved both novels...
It was spelled Lakertyan. They do have a reptilian appearance, so I suppose the Bakers could've derived the name from "lacertian" ("lizardlike"). After all, they called the four-eyed aliens Tetraps, and in their novelization, they not only just used backward English for the Tetraps' language, but actually told the readers that was what it was in-universe, which is the stupidest thing I've ever read in a Doctor Who novel.
Just typing from memory, though it's unusual for me to not go and verify spelling beforehand... I must be regenerating but in a different way...
I forgot that the tetraps, in the novel, used backward English. I agree, it's stupid, and is definitely a bit much, IMHO, and may have been better-suited for a different story under ideal conditions. If nothing else, they were ahead of their time in having an alien species mangle English as a language. For more on this, see "Darmok".
The Second Doctor had his recorder. Not a lot of Doctors have been musically inclined, it seems.
Yup.
As much as Capaldi is an excellent player, and maybe this is a bias of mine, the Doctor has always been eccentric. Nothing screams eccentric less than a modern-looking electric guitar.
I think it was just that she, the Doctor, and the Master had all been childhood friends, so it made sense to say that they were in the same year at school. (Not that the Doctor's age ever made sense. Given that he lived for subjective centuries between this and "Rose," how come he's back to 900 there?)
Hehehehe!

I agree that it likely was their being childhood friends/acquaintances/rivals/somethings and I'm definitely looking into it too much. I don't recall if they were asked about why P&J wrote in the age as being both his and the Rani's...
As for the centuries, it's definitely been as subjective as inconsistent. The 2nd Doctor said he was 450 years old. We can only guess how far Hartnell's span was before he regenerated due to (old age, combined with the TARDIS being a requirement, as confirmed in "The Power of the Daleks". ) The 4th said he was 750 years old, several times, citing 756 even in the Key to Time season but then glibly says "750" again in "The Leisure Hive", though Pangol's villainy of attempting to age him to death is still suitably creepy, but I digress: Throughout all of his 7 shown years, they weren't thinking too much into the age-flinging either.
"Over 900 years old" says the 6h.
Then "953" by 7. Why the 9th be so nonchalant and un-agocentric as simply saying 900 - that was one of the things that irked me the least, even if "1200" may have been more fun - but it wouldn't matter, since the humans would all be in envy anyway. He did say it, if I recall, as a hand-waived approximation and that's probably why. Between 7 and 9, there'd be far more than 953 on the proverbial odometer. Later incarnations I don't remember, but I think they're finally using quadruple-digits now...
Well, it's a real hypothetical thing. It hasn't been directly observed yet.
True. Theoretical science isn't quite science fact, nor is it complete science fantasy, hehe.
I think that's imposing too many retroactive ideas onto it. "The Brain of Morbius" is not the baseline to be contradicted -- at least, it wasn't until "The Timeless Children" re-established it 3 1/2 years ago. Before then, it was the exception to the baseline, the anomaly in a continuity that had repeatedly and explicitly established Hartnell's Doctor as "the original, you might say." Many of us back then handwaved the unidentified faces as Morbius's past lives rather than the Doctor's. The idea of time being malleable is also a latter-day idea introduced by Steven Moffat to handwave the inconsistencies between the classic and modern series, and the need to rewrite the classic series's version of Earth history from the 1970s onward.
^^this, on all counts.
It's a controversy that won't ever end, that's for sure. And Moffat had a difficult task to do, that's for sure.
At the time "Time and the Rani" came out, none of those ideas would've been established yet. The Doctor's line about being the Seventh is entirely consistent with "The Three Doctors" and "The Five Doctors" establishing Hartnell (or Hurndall) as the First, and with "Mawdryn Undead" confirming that Davison was the Fifth. "Morbius" was just a single-story continuity glitch in a series that never had much continuity anyway. It wasn't until decades later that people started spinning theories to rationalize it.
True, on all counts again.
I remember finding it pretty bad, but maybe that's largely because the novelization is horrible. Pip & Jane Baker were really bad novelizers, and not much better scriptwriters.
I liked P&J's ideas, but they didn't always get executed the best.
"The Mark of the Rani" has the acting and visuals to complement a mix of historical aspects hodgepodged together... plus that damn tree.
"Terror of the Vervoids" is easily their best for me, and the "trial-less" edit with added and revised footage is surprisingly sublime. A few bad f/x shots don't damper it too much... maybe I like ot more for certain bits of dialogue and playing with "animal vs plant life" in a way that's probably the genre's only time where you're almost terrified of the plants instead of laughing voraciously at it - see "The Great Vegetable Rebellion" from "Lost in Space" and "The Rules of Luton" from "Space 1999", especially if you need a good laugh. At least IMHO. They're truly horrible, but at least "Rebellion" has a comedic quality that works, and the cast commentary on the blu-ray is alone worthy of the boxset purchase. "Luton" is so po-faced with its inconsistencies and other issues, yet flat and soulless in execution, that it's beyond redemption. (It's been, what, a decade since I watched "Luton", but youtube reaction videos can cover that, hehe.)
"The Ultimate Foe" had to be made in a hurry, and it shows. Based on what's known of the original and intended finale, watching a glass of water try to evaporate in humid weather would be more compelling than the script JNT vetoed. (Not just because it ended on a cliffhanger that's even stupider than some of P&J's original ideas for "Time and the Rani", on top of what was written in the novelization.)
"Time and the Rani" -- still placing it above "Foe", but not by much, and despite "Foe" feeling less gaudy as a production - late-80s styles were generally far more garish than Colin's outfit... "Time", for me, still has more enjoyable when not intriguing set-pieces, but it's also twice as long.