3. I would ignore anything JJ-Trek related. No mention of the Romulan nova (Or it just didn't happen.)
I'm tired of seeing this kind of sentiment in comments about recent Trek.
Indeed. In fact, in my opinion Picard Season 1 had an interesting set up in following up on the "unthinkable happening" with the Romulus' destruction there is significant fallout to explore. I would have focused on it rather than the Borg and synths in any great measure.I'm tired of seeing this kind of sentiment in comments about recent Trek. They were three average at best movies, but they happened. You can't say you want canon and then cut out whatever you want.
My head canon is that the not-Xenomorph acid blood that fell on his hand had some kind of secondary poison. That explains why Zhaban and Laris never tried to follow up with Picard as season 1's events escalated. This allows season 2 to occur exactly 18 months later in October 2400, providing the max space for season 3 to then be in April 2401.What the Hell happened to Zhaban? He seemed perfectly healthy in S1 and then he just dies?
I consider the first season to be the single worst season of live action Star Trek set in the 24th century.
So, if I were CBS / Paramount, after the rough cut of the first two episodes came in,
I would have shut down production, brought in a dream team from the Berman era (Ira Steven Behr, Manny Coto, Rene Echeveria...) and told them there's $75 million left in the budget. Unfuck this mess.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.