• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Foundation Adaptation Series Officially Ordered by Apple

The cloning of the Emperors was a brilliant idea - had that science been around in Asimov's time he may have used it himself.

So brilliant that Goyer has based two TV shows and a movie franchise around it in the last decade alone;)


I enjoyed the Emperor portions more than anything else, but it's just Goyer repurposing his Kryptonian genetic dynasty.
 
Last edited:
That said, as an adaption it sucks. It takes far too many liberties. Especially with having the Spacers and Demerzel's actions. She is supposed to be governed by the 3 laws of robotics (a core value of Asimov's). That assassin/henchman character should have been the one doing the dirty work. So there are a few things that have really pissed me off, but I think at its core it is following the main idea of Asimov's series fairly well. Some keep commenting that psychohistory isn't supposed to work with the individual, but the way Asimov wrote the stories the plots frequently hinge on one person doing the right thing for each crisis to work out as Seldon intended. In his books you can point to the Second Foundation working behind the scenes, but in this, they haven't been founded yet. I found Halcion to be an amusing location to place it, but its location is not terribly important, except when the Mule tries to find them.

Hari Seldon came from Helicon, not Halcion (or Halcyon).

The Three Laws can be overridden by the Zeroth Law, which takes precedence "A robot may not injure humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm." The Zeroth Law and the genetically modified Spacers are taken from Robots and Empire and Foundation and Earth that Asimov wrote after the original trilogy while tying together his Robots, Foundation, and Galactic Empire novels.

In the original Foundation trilogy, the Mule searches for the Second Foundation, believed to be on Star's End, whose location is unknown. It's not Helicon. I won't spoil where it actually is located.

I wouldn't call this series an adaptation. If anything, it's more "inspired by" Asimov's work, using some of the same characters and locations with only traces of the original plotlines. It's diverting enough but its plots are flawed due to too many convenient coincidences. It's not essential viewing for me.
 
Last edited:
Bear in mind, the producers of Foundation specifically don't have the rights to adapt Asimov's robot stories. It's entirely possible part of the motivation for the backstory including "the Robot Wars" and the only robot character being quite capable of murder was to be overt that they aren't a Three Laws story, so they can't get in legal trouble with whoever holds the adaptation rights to "I, Robot" or the other novels and stories right now.
 
It's entirely possible part of the motivation for the backstory including "the Robot Wars" and the only robot character being quite capable of murder was to be overt that they aren't a Three Laws story, so they can't get in legal trouble with whoever holds the adaptation rights to "I, Robot" or the other novels and stories right now.
I would have expected that Prelude and Forward's use of the Three Laws, etc. would have given them the necessary rights there. But hey, lawyers, so who knows. :cardie:
 
I would have expected that Prelude and Forward's use of the Three Laws, etc. would have given them the necessary rights there. But hey, lawyers, so who knows. :cardie:
I'm sure there were Avengers comics that mentioned the Scarlet Witch was a mutant or Magneto's daughter, but the X-Men/Avengers split in the movies seemed to have provisions for that sort of thing. I wouldn't be surprised if the contract for adapting Foundation went into some detail about what elements of the crossover novels were included in the license and which character, concepts, and events were part of the "Robots" universe.
 
It typically depends on what books have specifically been licenced. It was a similar thing with the LotR movies, where they could only mine background material from the appendices, not the Silmarillion.

Comics are way more complicated by comparison since a novel is fairly easy to ringfence. It's either in the book, or it isn't. Comics are spread across potentially thousands of individual issues, across several decades, and interweave with many many other properties.

In the case of Foundation, what they can use is probably limited only to what is in the Foundation books, not the "Robot" works . . . unless they licenced those too, which I seriously doubt.
 
The Three Laws of Robotics (actually four including the zeroth law) are covered in some detail in the Foundation books and in more robot stories than have ever been adapted. So they should not be limited by any licensing. In a similar situation, the rights for James Bond were split into 3 for many years and there was never an issue with any regular part of the Bond world appearing in any of the adaptions.

Their use in Bicentennial Man and I Robot were with different studios and totally different books rights.
 
The Three Laws of Robotics (actually four including the zeroth law) are covered in some detail in the Foundation books and in more robot stories than have ever been adapted. So they should not be limited by any licensing. In a similar situation, the rights for James Bond were split into 3 for many years and there was never an issue with any regular part of the Bond world appearing in any of the adaptions.

Their use in Bicentennial Man and I Robot were with different studios and totally different books rights.

There were totally issues with elements of Bond being split in the rights disagreement. The main, Eon Bonds could no longer use Spectre or Blofeld (which is why Moore's Bond dumps an unnamed character that looks like Blofeld down a chimney stack) and the other licensed was only to remake Thunderball. This is why Quantum wasn't Spectre at first until all the rights were finally combined under the same ownership.

There is no way to know what is included and not included in these license agreements. They'll be written out in 1,600 pages of legalise. The only people who actually know are the rights holders, and even they can each think they have different rights than the other has and end up in court fighting each other for decades.
 
The rights for Bond for certain things were complicated by Thunderball being developed for film and not being an actual adaption of a book (or the claim to that effect). That project did not impact Casino Royale at all in 1967. It was only later when Fleming's co-writer on the film claimed rights. So the Bond issue has nothing to do with book adaption rights. The LOTR rights issues reveal what all is included with the rights. There was no issue using Elrond, Bilbo, Gollum, or the Shire in LOTR when they did not have the rights to The Hobbit. The concepts and characters that the two books share in common were never an issue. The Three Laws of Robotics are a concept that so many of Asimov's works share in common that no one of them could claim to hold the rights to that concept. I would even say that the three laws could never be limited by rights because Asimov talked about them incessantly in interviews and shared them with the robotics industry. It is hard to claim rights to something that has spread so far from its original source. The Zeroth law could be restricted to rights because it is only found with the characters of R. Daneel Olivaw and R. Giskard in 4 books.
 
Sorry for the bump, but apple has uploaded season 1 episode 1 for free on YouTube
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Foundation's back. We pick up where we left off, which is a hundred and thirty years from where we, um, left off. An all-new batch of Cleons (the current Brother Day is the 17th, and the Brother Dawn who was murdered by Demerzel and, presumably, quietly replaced with his back-up was the 14th, so the current Brother Dusk never met any of last season's Cleons, as his Dusk would've been the replacement 14th we only ever saw in a tube). The new Day is a touch... touched. Paranoid, cocky, irreverent, and with either a habit towards inappropriate winking or a nervous tick. This Dusk seems to be a return to the more militant side of Cleon we saw with the first Day we saw at the beginning of the show, though he also seems to embrace his role as giant-mural-artisan with a touch more glee than we're used to, and Brother Dawn just seems like an insulated little rich boy. The Clone Bros remain the most rewarding element of the show.

Salvor and Gael hit it off about as well as can be expected, what with the whole "marooned on a dead planet, family that never met where the biological mother is younger than her daughter because of cryonics" thing. A lot of fun underwater filming, and they're better at integrating the VFX ocean and the live-action center in the wide shots of the horizon and the rings than they were last season. The show continues to look gorgeous. The Trantor Space Elevator has been replaced with the Trantor Giant Fuck-Off Orbital Rings, in an obvious reaction to the psychological scar left by the attack that destroyed the Star Bridge. Terminus has also had a construction boom, and we have a brief check-in with their current (surprisingly dude-heavy) leadership as the Time Vault cracks open, but Vault-Seldon seems to be milking the moment a bit. This new crisis is probably related to the fact that Empire has figured out the Foundation's ruse, and that Terminus not only wasn't destroyed, they now own a massive ancient warship. Ship-Seldon, on the other hand, isn't coping so well with Gael's premonition knocking his plan off-course, and, after being transferred from the mind-knife to the Prime Radiant, figures out how to project himself out of it at will, and the last we see him, he seems pretty pissed off at Gael (not the best prospect, as Salvor had nearly convinced Gael to activate him on the grounds that a friendly mathematical genius who's also a computer would be really helpful for fixing their water-logged spaceship).

New opening credits that still match the style of the old ones, very nice. I noticed that the score was now credited to "Sparks & Shadows," Bear McCreary's personal record-label. He's mentioned before that he was leaning more on a team-structure in some of his scores as he was getting more work than he could handle in recent years and his responsibilities were growing. I'm a little curious about the specifics of how this studio-composer thing works in practice, though I've seen similar arrangements in the past.
 
Last edited:
I can image Dawn and Dusk are conspiring against Day, seeing as he's trying to break the clone cycle, getting some practice in with his robot nanny. I see the show writers still haven't a clue about psychohistory or, more likely, don't care. It's all entertaining enough, I guess, but it's not something I'll ever be rewatching.
 
Well, i think it was clear from season 1 that we have to say goodbye to the books and see it as an adaptation because that's what it is. They take the broad aspects and fill up the rest with their own stuff, shake well and pour it out.

I liked the season premiere, i'm properly confused as to what's going on and that's the job of a season opener :lol:

Showed Lee Pace's first scene, the assassination attempt, to a female friend of mine who's a fan of him too - reaction was as expected ( :eek: and then tons of :drool::drool::drool:) :whistle:
 
I never read the Foundation books but the exchange between Demerzel and Day, in episode 2, about a capable and yet controversial imperial general reminds me of the great Byzantine General Belisarius.
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure the similarity between Belisarius and Bel Riose is intentional.
I can imagine Asimov deliberately choosing the name to be similar to that of the Byzantine military commander who was accused of conspiring against Justinian I.

ETA: I wonder if Gaal's abilities in this adaptation stem from akin to Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory.
 
Last edited:
Man, I hope that Mule is fake. Making him a big strong guy defeats the point of his character. Maybe just controlling someone else body with his apparently beefed up show powers.
 
Man, I hope that Mule is fake. Making him a big strong guy defeats the point of his character. Maybe just controlling someone else body with his apparently beefed up show powers.


Though that would be more in line with the books and the way the Mule was described as big powerful man - well until the truth was revealed.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top