• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Kirk drift—misremembering a character…

Status
Not open for further replies.
Disagree. The TOS E design could easily have been updated without going to the extremes they did with the refit design.
The premise that they had to go to the extremes of the refit design is a straw man. I didn't say that.

At this point, it's also worth pointing out that the most extreme departure from the TOS design—the new shape of the nacelles—was inherited from the Phase 2 design contemplated for the sequel television series.

Anyway, topic drift.
 
Very talented artists have come up with updates of the TOS E with additional detailing that would have been nigh indistinguishable from the original if played on a 1966 television.

The most radical (and least successful IMNVHO) change to the shape of the Enterprise was the JJ-prise. The most faithful to the original shape was the TMP ship which people who are not even me have called the greatest cinematic spaceship of all time.

That Matt Jefferies. He came up with somethin', eh?
 
Someone earlier asked if any other character was misremmebered

I think Picard is sometimes wrongly viewed in the opposite way: he's assumed to be by the book but he often rejects.the orders of higher-ups if he views them as wrong. It's funny how Shaw views Picard & Riker as cowboys in a way
 
At this point, it's also worth pointing out that the most extreme departure from the TOS design—the new shape of the nacelles—was inherited from the Phase 2 design contemplated for the sequel television series.

There are those who believe that nacelles here began out there, in the 1940s, with a futuristic locomotive design Matt Jefferies followed for Phase II:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

https://www.google.com/search?newwi...FkFHZG3B_YQ0pQJegQIDRAB&biw=960&bih=460&dpr=2
 
Someone earlier asked if any other character was misremmebered

I think Picard is sometimes wrongly viewed in the opposite way: he's assumed to be by the book but he often rejects.the orders of higher-ups if he views them as wrong. It's funny how Shaw views Picard & Riker as cowboys in a way
Excellent point.

If I have my numbers correct, we have rather more screen time of Picard than Kirk. And over that time the character himself drifted, not just the perception of him. Yet in many ways (not counting the series Picard) that perception has usually been grounded in Season 1 and 2 Picard.

Interesting that the measuring stick for Picard has almost always been the drifted perception of Kirk.
 
Excellent point.

If I have my numbers correct, we have rather more screen time of Picard than Kirk. And over that time the character himself drifted, not just the perception of him. Yet in many ways (not counting the series Picard) that perception has usually been grounded in Season 1 and 2 Picard.

Interesting that the measuring stick for Picard has almost always been the drifted perception of Kirk.

Thanks. And yeah, Picard did have over twice the episodes so he had more time to change during his first run. Seasons 1-2 have him at his most typical iirc. Later seasons tended to have a lot more corrupted admirals.

In Picard though he's more of a rule breaker.
 
If the audience misinterprets it then fine, let them. That's what discussion are for. But, unlike you I personally want a Kirk with setbacks, and struggles and learning. Watching him over the course of the film, even with the ladies, his attitude shifts completely. He goes from leering, to peeking, to worried about Carol to actually checking on her after they beam back. There is a clear through line of growth in the whole movie and that's what makes it so great.

I see your point about the film, and almost wish I had seen it that way when I watched it. When I saw it, people literally booed certain parts and walked out when one character called himself "Khan" in the brig. I know a lot people felt that Kirk needed to re-earn his place when the eleventh film put him there so quickly. But to me, all I got from the movie was an adventure that, while exciting, had a "hero" doing a lot of things that seemed very out-of-place.

If that Kirk journey of responsibility had been shown before Kirk took command, I'd feel differently, I suppose. I know this may come off a bit ridiculous, but if TOS Kirk was "married" to his ship, then alternate universe Kirk acting reckless, irresponsible and disrespectful to women while actually in command of the Enterprise felt like I was watching the "hero" mistreat his significant other.

  • Disobeying a direct order.
  • Facilitating a brig break
  • Assault on Federation officers.
  • Damage to Federation property.
  • Mutiny. Or at least conspiracy to usurp lawful chain of command.
  • Sabotage of military equipment.
  • Theft of military equipment
  • Violation of a quarantine zone
  • Destruction of military property
  • Using a false flag of truce to kill foreign nationals.

You are not wrong about these charges. But all but one were dropped, essentially pardoned by the Federation President himself, basically because he, the president, liked the overall outcome of what Kirk had done. Looking at the U.S. today, that does not seem that far fetched. And as I think about it, that give some reason why a later president let them stand trial a few years later: It could have been controversial with some influential people that the President acted with the authority, and he did not want to repeat that political tension (but of course it got tense anyway).
 
I see your point about the film, and almost wish I had seen it that way when I watched it. When I saw it, people literally booed certain parts and walked out when one character called himself "Khan" in the brig. I know a lot people felt that Kirk needed to re-earn his place when the eleventh film put him there so quickly. But to me, all I got from the movie was an adventure that, while exciting, had a "hero" doing a lot of things that seemed very out-of-place.
I guess that's the difference to me. I don't treat Kirk as the hero. He's the protagonist but he is still very much on a journey of self-discovery, so expecting him to do heroic things is what I expect in the third act of the film, not in the whole film.
If that Kirk journey of responsibility had been shown before Kirk took command, I'd feel differently, I suppose. I know this may come off a bit ridiculous, but if TOS Kirk was "married" to his ship, then alternate universe Kirk acting reckless, irresponsible and disrespectful to women while actually in command of the Enterprise felt like I was watching the "hero" mistreat his significant other.
You're right; this is ridiculous. Kirk being married to a ship was a ridiculous trope that should be left aside.
 
In a knee jerk reaction, I lost the timeline about Mitchell's "little blonde lab technician" comment; yes, it happened later, after the Farragut incident though I put their romance a little shorter; started in 2257 with David born in 2258 making him almost 25 in the TWOK.

Also, I agree on the TWOK 2283 date. Both Kirk and Khan say 15 years ago, so, that's gives 2268 for Space Seed. I also have TOS Season One starting in Sept 2266 (Stardate 1329.1), and spanning two years (mostly because of the passage of almost two thousand Stardates) which puts Space Seed in July 2268 (Stardate 3141.9). It fits! Also, the Stardate of TWOK is 8141.6, or almost exactly 5000 Stardates; add in a dropped 10,000 Stardates to keep the four digit format, and you get 15,000 Stardates or 15 years to the day. It fits, too.

As for Janice Lester, I have their one year romance more recently starting in 2264 then breaking up right before if not due to Kirk getting his promotion to Captain and being assigned the Enterprise. I fits better with Janice's "your world of starship captains...". She says, "Starfleet" and not Starfleet Academy. Perhaps Kirk had a ground posting job somewhere in Starfleet for the one year before getting the Enterprise in 2265. At least it fits. YMMV :).
Seems like a perfectly valid interpretation of the facts to me. I agree with a lot of what you've concluded!
What is in Kirk’s TOS character bio is he commanded another ship before the Enterprise, and it’s backed up by Dehner’s reference to his first command in WNMHGB. Makes sense because you wouldn’t give command of one of your best ships to an inexperienced neophyte.
Yeah. I couldn't deny the logic of Kirk commanding a smaller ship before the Enterprise, so in my timeline I have him taking command of the USS Saladin in 2263 while he's still at the rank of Commander. (Sorry I can't link to a specific year/section of the timeline, but Sutori doesn't work that way.) That way the Enterprise can still occupy a special place in Kirk's heart, as it's his first command as a Captain. But I'm happy that I gave Kirk a much more realistic career progression than the has in the official Okuda timeline.
How did you decide on winter/fall timing and things like New Year's Even for a proposal?
Trek doesn't have a whole lot of definite dates, so I generally give characters the same birth dates as the actors who played them. Merritt Butrick was born on September 3rd, 1959, meaning he was about 22-23 years old when he was making Wrath of Khan. Since I have TWOK taking place in 2283 (15 years after "Space Seed" and the same year as the bottle of Romulan Ale), that means that David was born in 2260. Subtracting nine months from September 3rd means that David was conceived around the beginning of December 2259. Since I was already in December, I decided New Year's Eve was a logical time for Jim and Carol to get engaged.

Kirk and Carol getting together in the fall of 2257 was determined from the academic calendar of Starfleet Academy. Again, since Trek doesn't give us any real indication of what months the typical Academy year runs, I just decided to have it be the same as the real life Naval Academy in San Francisco. And since 2257 has the same calendar as 2015, you just look up the academic calendar for the Naval Academy for 2015 and bingo, you've got Starfleet Academy's calendar for 2257-2258!

The Academy thing didn't get tricky for me until I reached the TNG era in my timeline, as then I had to either compress or stretch when episodes took place to accommodate when in the seasons Wesley and Nog went off to Starfleet Academy or were home on school breaks. It sort of works if you squint and don't look too closely. :)
I do like the idea that Kirk and Carol get together, or at least get back together after the loss of the Farragut. It does make the timing a bit smoother and helps explain how Kirk might be an instructor when some other episodes suggest he is serving on a ship.
It's the first and only time they get together in my timeline. They're together from the fall of 2257 until February of 2260. I wanted them together for some time to indicate it was a serious relationship, and I needed them to break up early enough that neither one of them realized yet that Carol was pregnant. I still wanted Carol to be a decent person (If she wasn't, why would Kirk fall for her?), so she doesn't find out she's pregnant until after their breakup. Kirk is already off on another deep space assignment after more than two years of being planetside, and she decides it's best not to tell him. ("Were we together? Were we going to be? You had your world and I had mine. And I wanted him in mine, not chasing through the universe with his father.") Kirk doesn't find out he's a father until sometime in the movie era. (Either during the 2 1/2 years between TOS and TMP or the 10 years between TMP and TWOK.)
Back to the original Kirk drift on womanizing, here's my order of Kirk's pre-TOS girlfriends covered in the series:
  1. Ruth
  2. Carol Marcus
  3. Janet Wallace
  4. Areel Shaw
  5. Janice Lester
  6. USS Enterprise ;)
  7. Helen Johansson? <Could Helen Johansson actually be Helen Noel after she left the Enterprise and got married?>
I have Kirk's past relationships in this order:

1) Ruth (~2250 - 2252 - "It's been 15 years" i.e., around the same time plebe Kirk was dealing with upperclassman Finnegan)
2) Janice Lester (~2253 - 2254 - As I said here, I'm not sure of the exact placement of this relationship, but as I have Kirk with Carol during his entire year of Command School, this would make the most sense. As we know from "Turnabout Intruder," this relationship ended badly.)
3) Carol Marcus (Fall 2257 - Feb. 2260 - explained above)
4) Janet Wallace (2261 - Breakup in Nov. 2261 "six years, four months, and an odd number of days" before March 2268 - Janet is Kirk's first serious relationship after his breakup with Carol, which is why he remembers her so fondly)
5) Areel Shaw (2262 - Breakup in July 2262 "four years, seven months, and an odd number of days" before Feb. 2267 - another old relationship where Kirk and his ex are still on good terms)

I don't imagine that Lt. Helen Johansson is the same person as Dr. Helen Noel, if for no other reason than Helen Noel would still likely be referred to as "Doctor" instead of by her rank. I figure Helen Johansson was just a dalliance that Kirk had while he was on leave at a Starbase or something. Definitely NOT someone under his command, as that seems to cross the line for Kirk. (Witness his awkwardness around both Janice Rand and Helen Noel - He felt weird about even flirting with them.) And considering Kirk's embarrassment at being reminded about this past affair while in Commodore Mendez's office, perhaps Kirk resolved to have no more romantic relationships inside of Starfleet after "The Menagerie." After all, he'd have no way of knowing who might someday end up under his command.

Yes, Kirk does seem to be flirting with the Prime Universe Marlena Moreau at the very end of "Mirror, Mirror," but since the credits start rolling before we hear anything Kirk says to her, I'm assuming he just forgot himself for a moment, quickly corrected himself, and went into professional mode once again. :)
I wonder how 2465 (25th century) crews will see TNG/DS9/VOY captains.
It'd serve those smug bastards right if they're just as marginalized and discounted as Kirk and his crew were by the TNG and VOY characters. ;)
 
Last edited:
Trek doesn't give us any real indication of what months the typical Academy year runs, I just decided to have it be the same as the real life Naval Academy in San Francisco.

You deserve some kind of award for even thinking of that approach.

I still wanted Carol to be a decent person (If she wasn't, why would Kirk fall for her?), so she doesn't find out she's pregnant until after their breakup.

I like that better than what was one of the novels, probably "The Lost Years," that had them both knowing about the pregnancy, but not being able to work it out and breaking up anyway. The book went so far as to suggest that Kirk wanted to marry Carol in part because of the tradition in his family of getting married once in a committed relationship, but Carol being opposed to it because in her family nobody got married. Thank goodness THAT idea never got put into a movie.

(Witness his awkwardness around both Janice Rand and Helen Noel - He felt weird about even flirting with them.)

I see your point on this one; however, it is not actually stated that Kirk and Helen Johannsen had a romantic relationship.

Miss Piper says that "a mutual friend described you" to Kirk.
Kirk looks a bit upset, and repeats "Helen described..." but trails off.
Miss Piper says, "She only mentioned she knew you," but gives Kirk a look.

(This is a great example of the former topic of characters not always being totally straightforward. Either "Helen" described more, and Miss Piper's later line is a stretch, or "Helen" described less and Miss Piper's earlier line is a stretch. Her look seems to imply that Kirk is someone that she wants to get to know more about, though.)

Based on that dialogue, it could be that Kirk feared that Helen would have described Kirk's romantic feelings for her after Dr. Addam's "treatment room," but Miss Piper was assuring him that she had only heard about him, not any actual stories. Whether that comment is true or not is up for debate by the viewer.
 
Trek doesn't give us any real indication of what months the typical Academy year runs, I just decided to have it be the same as the real life Naval Academy in San Francisco.
You deserve some kind of award for even thinking of that approach.
<shrug> Thanks, but it seems obvious. I can't have been the first person who thought of doing it.
I like that better than what was one of the novels, probably "The Lost Years," that had them both knowing about the pregnancy, but not being able to work it out and breaking up anyway. The book went so far as to suggest that Kirk wanted to marry Carol in part because of the tradition in his family of getting married once in a committed relationship, but Carol being opposed to it because in her family nobody got married.
The beauty of the dialogue between Kirk and Carol in TWOK is that it's ambiguous enough to allow lots of different interpretations as to what happened between them. Over on this thread, I asked folks on the BBS exactly when they thought Kirk found out he had a son, and I got a wide range of answers. There doesn't seem to be a clear consensus among fandom on this.

But for me personally, I really don't like the idea of Kirk being a deadbeat dad, or not being involved with his son's life unless he was explicitly told to stay away. And I also dislike the idea of Carol deliberately concealing her pregnancy from Kirk. So her finding out after he'd already shipped out on a deep space assignment seemed like the best solution.

I really liked what David S. Goodman did in The Autobiography of James T. Kirk book, though, where Kirk's distance from Carol is what
initially bonds Kirk with Dr. McCoy - They both have children they can't see because of their estrangement from their exes. Great character scene.
I see your point on this one; however, it is not actually stated that Kirk and Helen Johannsen had a romantic relationship.

Miss Piper says that "a mutual friend described you" to Kirk.
Kirk looks a bit upset, and repeats "Helen described..." but trails off.
Miss Piper says, "She only mentioned she knew you," but gives Kirk a look.
The implication of the dialogue seems straightforward enough to me. Helen Johannsen told Miss Piper something embarrassing about Kirk, or perhaps Miss Piper wanted Kirk to think Helen did, so she's teasing him about it. I don't think it's any kind of leap to think that Kirk had some sort of romance with Helen Johannsen in the past, and it's nothing he wants to see brought up in a meeting with a commodore.

(I don't think Helen Johannsen is the same person as Helen Noel, though, any more than I think Miss Piper is the long-lost daughter of Dr. Piper from WHNHGB. Unrelated people have the same first or last names all the time, and Helen Johannsen being the same person as Helen Noel from "Dagger of the Mind" is way too Small Universe Syndrome for my tastes.)

What really surprises me is that Piper chooses to do this right in front of her superior Commodore Mendez. You'd think she'd tease Kirk privately instead.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top