• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

TNG focuses less on the dangers of space and more on the politics of the federation and diplomatic issues, but that was still fine.
I’ve generally thought that was more about showing how advanced the space-faring civilisation of the Federation had become, and how well developed the Fed territory and infrastructure was by the mid 24th century compared to Kirk’s era. Might be wrong on that, though!
 
But the Kirk movies are just as guilty as the TNG ones in having to have their captain be an action hero. It just fit Kirks character better than Picard.

I don’t think this is true. Kirk barely gets out of his chair in TMP and TWOK. He basically just walks around or is back in his chair in TVH. Yes, he gets into a scuffle in TUC, but he’s clearly outmatched and just trying to survive.
 
I don’t think this is true. Kirk barely gets out of his chair in TMP and TWOK. He basically just walks around or is back in his chair in TVH. Yes, he gets into a scuffle in TUC, but he’s clearly outmatched and just trying to survive.

Agreed, a big point of TWoK is that it's a battle of wits, not brawn. Kirk and Khan never meet face-to-face. The closest Kirk comes to physical action in that film is jogging to engineering when Spock's dying.
 
Actually, the rest is 95% actor ego demanding these action hero aspects and 5% the writing having to bend over backwards to accommodate it.

This.

Picard as a character throughout TNG and the NG movies was not presented as a man approaching or going through a mid-life crisis; he was quite comfortable being that dry, tea-drinker sitting on the Prime Directive / Finger Pointing Throne, so for any who viewed "Die Hard Picard" as an aberration of his character, they were correct, as it was a forced, ego-driven decision having nothing to do with anything established in TNG.
 
This.

Picard as a character throughout TNG and the NG movies was not presented as a man approaching or going through a mid-life crisis; he was quite comfortable being that dry, tea-drinker sitting on the Prime Directive / Finger Pointing Throne, so for any who viewed "Die Hard Picard" as an aberration of his character, they were correct, as it was a forced, ego-driven decision having nothing to do with anything established in TNG.

I agree, and it really sucks, because I genuinely like Picard as he was portrayed in TNG (well, after season 1, anyway)
He was Jaques Cousteau in space. and I loved it.
 
Dune Buggy Picard just sucked. I get it, 74-year-old Captain feeling the passage of time after events like the Ba'ku crisis and watching Riker and Troi get married and start their new life together but still, the Argo is one of the dumbest sequences in a Trek film that on a GOOD day ranks #12 out of thirteen movies and usually dead last.
 
DeForest Kelley routinely acts both Shatner and Nimoy off of the screen. He is superlative and deserved his name in the credits far earlier than the beginning of Season 2.

His reaction to reliving his elderly father's death in TFF is a better performance than any other in that film save Laurence Luckinbill's, and may even top that.
 
This.

Picard as a character throughout TNG and the NG movies was not presented as a man approaching or going through a mid-life crisis; he was quite comfortable being that dry, tea-drinker sitting on the Prime Directive / Finger Pointing Throne, so for any who viewed "Die Hard Picard" as an aberration of his character, they were correct, as it was a forced, ego-driven decision having nothing to do with anything established in TNG.

That would be the fencing, shooting, raquet-balling, horse-riding, marathon-running, special-ops-and-getting-captured-by-Cardassians-ing, Die Hard-on-a-starshipping Picard established in TNG who is "suddenly out of character" when he does these things in the movies :shrug:
 
That would be the fencing, shooting, raquet-balling, horse-riding, marathon-running, special-ops-and-getting-captured-by-Cardassians-ing, Die Hard-on-a-starshipping Picard established in TNG who is "suddenly out of character" when he does these things in the movies :shrug:

Plus part time Indiana Jones cos-player and rogue lothario when it suits him
 
Here's what may be a controversial opinion/idea for a Star Trek series: Mix elements of Star Trek + Final Space + Farscape.

Premise: Similar to the opening on Voyager, a Federation starship encounters a space weirdness that throws it somewhere, where and even when is left a mystery. During the emergency, all hell breaks loose, most of the command crew is killed, and what's left opts to attempt escape on shuttles and pods in the middle of the event. The main character of the series, who is a junior officer, is left behind on the ship ... alone.

He awakes to a damaged ship where the computer has been damaged to the point that star charts and the ability to compute the ship's location have been lost. So, unlike Voyager, he has no idea which direction to even go towards home. It's also implied that whatever weirdness caused the event may have affected time, since the ship's computer shows signs of operating for a very long time even though the main character doesn't seem to have aged much, and the computer may have spent gods knows how long attempting to repair the damage to the ship, and in doing so it may be somewhat sentient.

The region of space the ship has ended up in has all new types of weirdness, but also an authoritarian government that all the cultures they initially encounter fears. Over the course of the season, the main cast is a rag-tag group of characters that come together to become the new crew of the ship episode-by-episode, with the junior officer that was left behind slowly emerging as worthy of being this lost ship's captain in how he brings his collected crew together and responds to the various crises. The Federation starship may even slowly get refitted with new tech along the way and be somewhat altered as things go along. And little-by-little, the ship spreads Federation values among the cultures it encounters, possibly planting the seeds for a new Federation in whatever part of the universe it ended up in.

Eventually, at the end of the first season, the ship's journey bothers the wrong people and brings it into conflict with the empire that claims this particular area of space. The twist comes when we find out the empire was founded by the survivors who left him behind (i.e., because of the time weirdness of the anomaly, they showed up in this area of space before he did). Also, this new empire is a blend of the empires we've already seen, with elements of the Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians, Dominion etc., that have been carried over. Instead of using Federation tech to explore and build connections like the main character, things get twisted and they decide to use their resources for control. We also find out that whatever caused the original anomaly may be a Q-level entity and may be directing the "evil" Starfleet survivors in their actions of establishing control through their empire.

And that entity may be the only source of knowing where home is and how to get home.
 
Last edited:
DeForest Kelley routinely acts both Shatner and Nimoy off of the screen. He is superlative and deserved his name in the credits far earlier than the beginning of Season 2.

Kelley was a strong performer, but I would not say he "routinely" acts Shatner & Nimoy off of the screen. Each served theor role, and in Shatner's case, he never ran out of great performances to make Kirk the icon that he remains today.

His reaction to reliving his elderly father's death in TFF is a better performance than any other in that film save Laurence Luckinbill's, and may even top that.

Well, Spock being half Vulcan was going to prevent him from delivering a bigger, dramatic reaction to his "pain memory", while Kirk flat out refused to have his personal life held up by a manipulator's puppet strings, so Shatner's performance was--by necessity--subdued compared to the others, with the exception of his growling "I need my pain" moment.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top