I do understand your logic here but they're so thin and flimsy that something that's ostensibly an advantage can become a liability very quickly...
The two necks of the Odyssey still make more design sense than the tacked-on bulges on the stardrive of the Enterprise B.I do understand your logic here but they're so thin and flimsy that something that's ostensibly an advantage can become a liability very quickly...
But they're not, they're shaped just like the D's neck, they get thicker as your go back.but they're so thin and flimsy
"Aerodynamic" hull geometry is a necessary component for quantum slipstream drive. That's why the Dauntless-A in "Hope and Fear" looked like a sea animal. Voyager already had an aerodynamic shape for unspecified reasons (variable warp geometry?). At least in STO, quantum slipstream drive is a standard feature of Starfleet ships, so the Enterprise-F's shape would have to comply with QSD.It's non-sensical because:
1. It serves no functional design purpose for a vessel that operates chiefly in space. It would make much more sense if it were an issue of aero- or hydrodynamics but it isn't.
Still it's not Canon that the Odyssey Class as seen in Picard would be equipped with such a drive as the ship was evidently already in service for years before ~2401, enough time for the technology to be tested, and a QSD is never mentioned or hinted at. It's tough having to remind people that STO isn't canon."Aerodynamic" hull geometry is a necessary component for quantum slipstream drive. That's why the Dauntless-A in "Hope and Fear" looked like a sea animal. Voyager already had an aerodynamic shape for unspecified reasons (variable warp geometry?). At least in STO, quantum slipstream drive is a standard feature of Starfleet ships, so the Enterprise-F's shape would have to comply with QSD.
The two necks of the Odyssey still make more design sense than the tacked-on bulges on the stardrive of the Enterprise B.
"Aerodynamic" hull geometry is a necessary component for quantum slipstream drive. That's why the Dauntless-A in "Hope and Fear" looked like a sea animal. Voyager already had an aerodynamic shape for unspecified reasons (variable warp geometry?). At least in STO, quantum slipstream drive is a standard feature of Starfleet ships, so the Enterprise-F's shape would have to comply with QSD.
Got to love those shields!Well, the Intrepid Class canonically had a use case that included non-crashing in-atmosphere functions so an aerodynamic design makes sense here!
I just remembered that the JJ-prise was totally submerged at one point, haha!!
I thought that the Dauntless in Prodigy had a QSD, which is how they were able to go after Protostar.If the QSD or in fact even the Protowarp Drive seen in prodigy were both successful experiments then by 2401 the whole of Starfleet would be using these Propulsion Systems as they are simply far more convenient and efficient than regular warp drive.
Only for the faster vevrsion of QSD.QSD isn't more convenient - the calculations are doable but hard. More importantly, you need the very rare benamite to propel.
Love handles.The two necks of the Odyssey still make more design sense than the tacked-on bulges on the stardrive of the Enterprise B.
I feel the same way about the C and the D as large and clunky and primitive.And IMO the Titanprise only makes sense in a timeline where the Federation experiences a Space Dark Ages where its technology stagnates or regresses.)
The two necks of the Odyssey still make more design sense than the tacked-on bulges on the stardrive of the Enterprise B.
You don't need a Dark Age to explain it. Starfleet was just feeling nostalgic, or decided on a retro twist for that ship.(And IMO the Titanprise only makes sense in a timeline where the Federation experiences a Space Dark Ages where its technology stagnates or regresses.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.