Need? No, but life is a bit easier if there comes a measure of acceptance over what can be changed by whom.and we as fans need to blindly accept this…
Need? No, but life is a bit easier if there comes a measure of acceptance over what can be changed by whom.and we as fans need to blindly accept this…
Oh!I didn't miss that; it wasn't relevant. It doesn't signify "Queen" as hypothetical or approximate nomenclature.
Well if Terry wants his Legacy series he had better start to tighten (Titan) up his ship.Need? No, but life is a bit easier if there comes a measure of acceptance over what can be changed by whom.
I'm pretty sure if I look at the credits for FC, she'll be listed as The Borg Queen. That's what I thought she was called in 1996, well before "Dark Frontier", and that's what everyone online referred to her as at the time.‘Borg Queen’ was a term coined by the Hansens to describe this Borg’s specific role within the Collective, the Borg have never referred to this being as ‘their Queen’ themselves. ‘Borg Queen’ is a third party human/Starfleet designation for this embodiment of the Collective. The modern day Star Trek writers in Picard may have misunderstood this and turned this assimilated Borg construct in to a literal Queen? This would be an example of a writer misinterpreting and misrepresenting past canon (which may also be erroneous, ambiguous or badly written) and putting their own spin on to it. But, now it has been done and depicted ‘on screen’ in Picard I guess that it is canon and should be respected as such, you are correct. Terry Matalas is the show runner and can write whatever the hell he wants, and we as fans need to blindly accept this… that is a perk of his job.![]()
Respectfully, you're talking out of your rear here. She's not some interchangeable, redundant function of some machine. Nothing on-screen supports this analysis.Regardless, both the Queen of an insect colony and the Borg are impermanent and empty phenomena. They are not fixed entities but rather arise due to causes and conditions and need, and they will eventually pass away or at least desolve in warp coolant fluid (hehe). The insect Queen's role as a reproductive leader of the colony is not permanent, as she will eventually die and be replaced by another Queen. Similarly, the Borg Queen is easily replaceable…..
Well, Terry does like zombies, and he is the show runner. Perhaps Disney will hire him next?Of course he is. I don't want to speak for anyone in particular here, but I've noticed a trend with Trek fans in that they attempt to extrapolate greater sophistication from the material they enjoy in order to convince themselves, in turn, that the content they're consuming is more sophisticated or cerebral than it is. The Borg are not that complex. They're cyborg zombies ruled by an evil Disney-villain queen.
I beg to differ, this has been most notable of such in Picard season 2. Annie Wersching’s Borg Queen ‘essence’ was quite easily transferred in to Jurati. She comes across as being a pretty hot swappable Queen to me, at least as depicted in Picard season 2.Respectfully, you're talking out of your rear here. She's not some interchangeable, redundant function of some machine. Nothing on-screen supports this analysis.
Do you see it as being beyond the realms of possibility that the Borg Queen may have undertaken such a transference at the end of Picard season 3? She may quite simply have not had enough time to put on a stage show in this instance, though I am sure that she had a Disney villain style escape plan and may pop up again one day. We may not have seen the last of her… muwahahahahaha!All that proves is that she transfers her consciousness between bodies in the event of her destruction, not that the Queen as a person is replaced. The different actresses mean nothing. There aren't multiple Kirks because the character has been portrayed by three different people. The fact that Alice Krige has reprised the role three times now should be evidence enough of that. You're really cherry picking tenuous "evidence" and then ignoring whatever doesn't support your obstinate head canon.
I think that the writers made it pretty clear that Seven of Nine was taking on a Borg Queen role in this particular episode, with Seven temporarily becoming Queen of a ‘micro collective’. How else would you describe the role that Seven took amongst the Borg on the Artifact if not as being that of becoming a Queen?Seven didn't become THE Borg Queen, she just took control of a derelict cube.
Alright cool, now you're getting the spirit of the character!Do you see it as being beyond the realms of possibility that the Borg Queen may have undertaken such a transference at the end of Picard season 3? She may quite simply have not had enough time to put on a stage show in this instance, though I am sure that she had a Disney villain style escape plan and may pop up again one day. We may not have seen the last of her… muwahahahahaha!
And in doing so gained full control of the Artifact micro Collective and in essence becoming their temporary Queen.Seven used her knowledge of the Borg to do that yes, but she wasn't THE Queen, nor does that action prove your point.
Because a hive mind becomes one entity, a collective conciousness. Any conciousness can get lonely. They are a singular consciousness made up of many absorbed consciousness individuals. I agree that this is a paradoxical phenomenon but a hive mind consciousness is, by definition, is a collection of individual minds or entities working together as one cohesive unit, in the Borg case this hive mind being interconnected with technology/a neural link. Perhaps this is why the Borg continue to assimilate and add to their technological and biological distinctiveness, they may be infinitely lonely and wish to add to themselves in order to satisfy that endless need for connection.How can a hive mind consciousness be lonely? How can it desire a counterpart to ease that feeling of isolation?
It would not exist, it would be an individual, not an interconnected, technologically augmented, Borg hive mind. Without such a hive mind, there can be no hive mind consciousness.How can a hive mind consciousness exist if there's no hive mind?
Because the Queen is an avatar, a projection which is capable of acting semi autonomously, a compartmentalised facet of the Collective who is used to coordinate the hive mind. This is either the result of Borg evolution or a parasitic intelligence taking control of the Collective, which becomes the Queen.Why would that manifestation of a hive mind consciousness talk to and contradict itself as being distinct from the Collective?
Why would anybody want to cure something that can be perceived as being physically attractive? Baldness is an attribute, not a flaw.I'm fine with speculation in areas that accommodate it; I'm not going to maintain that Picard has always had a full head of hair because I refuse to accept that male-pattern baldness still hasn't been cured in the 24th century.
Okay, it's good that we've come to an understanding on this. So the Borg Queen in both the prime and Confederation timelines becomes divested of her Collective context, yet still behaves in the exact manner she always did before. This is compounded by the fact that she yearns to hear voices other than her own, and chafes at the isolation wrought by the confines of her own mind. This is 100% indicative of individuality. If she were an avatar, she would not have any personality of her own, and thus would cease to be; her body would go limp like a puppet severed from its strings. Moreover, what need would an avatar have to wield first-person singular pronouns such as "I," "me," and "mine?" The voice of the Borg Collective considers itself only in plural terms. Moreover, a collective consciousness would never seek the companionship of an individual to soothe the burden of loneliness. The Borg are about folding everything into the whole, not maintaining the individuality of its constituent members. The Queen, as an individual with her own desires separate from the will of the Collective, does seek this form of "companionship," because the voices in her Collective are drones stripped of free will, hence why she was so disappointed in Locutus. This is beyond straightforward, my friend. Writers are going to stick with Occam's razor here for the purposes of narrative efficiency, and that, I suspect, is why you and many others are so disenchanted with the Queen and how she's been portrayed. She simplifies, humanizes, and demystifies an alien culture that you celebrated for its otherness. It's obvious you don't like—and mock—that she's written as a comic book supervillain. There's also a lineage here that can be traced from Brannon Braga all the way to Terry Matalas, since Terry worked with Braga in the past on multiple projects and even collaborated with him to write that Hive comic back in 2013 that portrayed the Queen as, surprise surprise, the actual Queen of the Borg. I understand being dismayed at this, but this is a fight you can't win; there's too much of this authorial intent in the material to ignore. You can say you prefer to interface with the material through the lens of your headcanon—and you'd be perfectly within your right to do so—but please don't pretend like your headcanon IS canon when discussing this material with others.It would not exist, it would be an individual, not an interconnected, technologically augmented, Borg hive mind. Without such a hive mind, there can be no hive mind consciousness.
I know some fans got pissed at the Enterprise-D maneuvering around like this....
All I could think was.... Look at the old girl fly!!
Also the reason this looks so much more acrobatic is the highly dynamic camera movement which we’ve never seen before.
Not even DS9 starship cinematography was quite there with the Defiant.
And because the scale of the Borg cube as a ginormous static reference point adds to the effect.
It's almost like the Stealth Camera Drone documenting the flight of the Enterprise-D into the Queen's Mega Cube had to also dodge all the non-sensical Borg Structure that was in the way to avoid collision while filming the Enterprise-D do it's thing.Yep, I made the same point in another thread. The camera moves much more kinetically than the E-D does. Also, the scale of the size of the Borg ship (?) was established in several shots before the sequence and you get a sense of how vast it is.
It's almost like the Stealth Camera Drone documenting the flight of the Enterprise-D into the Queen's Mega Cube had to also dodge all the non-sensical Borg Structure that was in the way to avoid collision while filming the Enterprise-D do it's thing.
And? People complain about uniforms, ranks, badges, costuming errors, scale of ships, and registry numbers but this is too far? Being distracted by obvious CGI?This complaints about that will enter the Pantheon of Ridiculous Fan Bullshit.
And? People complain about uniforms, ranks, badges, costuming errors, scale of ships, and registry numbers but this is too far? Being distracted by obvious CGI?
I thought new Trek was to be ridiculed for relying on CGI too much but now I must welcome it with open arms or be told "this is ridiculous fan bullshit?"![]()
You should write inspirational greeting cards, sir.Oh, I say it with love and affection as I am a frequent visitor and patron of the Pantheon of Fan Bullshit!
Well yeah, it's not canon, it just gives insight into how these writers think of the Queen.View attachment 34353
(I made a new Star Trek meme)
I will check out the Hive comic as it looks cool, though I shall not be considering it as canon in any way.
A Borg Planning Commission with the Queen as the only person running it is a "Rubber Stamp" commission.Haha, the Borg Planning Commission will have you know that those are LOAD BEARING structures extending across the gap at weird angles!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.