• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Well, Sisko ultimately left his family, including an unborn child if I remember correctly, for the wormhole aliens, so...
It rubbed me the wrong way and it's the one thing I didn't like about "What You Leave Behind". I guess we're supposed to have faith that Sisko returned on day, kind of like how we're supposed to have faith that Jesus will return one day... completing the analogy between Sisko and Jesus.
 
Well, Sisko ultimately left his family, including an unborn child if I remember correctly, for the wormhole aliens, so...

My wife thinks that too, and I understand why someone would think that.

But I don't think he went in thinking he would end up with the Prophets. I equate it more to going on a mission for Starfleet, which the very nature of space can leave Kasidy a widow and a single mom at any time.

Which is why I never saw it as abandonment.
 
Likely controversial but am sure I'm not alone: I really enjoy Neelix

I still think it's a shame they almost exclusively used him for comedic relief (and often of a none too high quality). The few episodes in which we got to see a deeper side to him (Jetrel, Fair Trade, Mortal Coil, Homestead) convinced me they could (and should) have gotten a lot more out of the character than they did.

Captain Picard was still totally in-character for Star Trek: First Contact and Action Hero Picard is the same man from TNG. Don't forget Kirk was an action hero going bare knuckle with Gorn before Picard was in Diapers! There is nothing wrong with a starship captain being physically fit and capable of surviving a lot of physical punishment and stress. Did you see what Picard went through when he was tortured by the cardassians? Picard was always a badass. Just because he is intelligent and empathetic doesn't mean he can't punch or shoot his way out of a problem if he has to.

I have no problem with Picard kicking some serious ... whenever he needs to. That fits in with what we know of him. I do have a bit of a problem with him jumping into 'action hero' mode when it's not necessary, for example when deploying the Argos in NEM. That's something I wouldn't have expected of series Picard.

"Yesterday's Enterprise" is the best mirror universe episode that's technically not really the mirror universe. And it's the only time since TOS the "dark timeline" feels actually realistic, since it doesn't go totally over the top.

It's a good episode. The only thing that doesn't really feel 'right' with me is how the Klingons came so close to defeating the Federation, when it seems that in the TNG main timeline, they seem to take a bit of a backseat to the Federation in terms of power.
 
Star trek is more action adventure then pop philosophy.

Strange new worlds should pull a superman and lois and be in its own timeline to free up the writers down the road.
 
I still think it's a shame they almost exclusively used him for comedic relief (and often of a none too high quality). The few episodes in which we got to see a deeper side to him (Jetrel, Fair Trade, Mortal Coil, Homestead) convinced me they could (and should) have gotten a lot more out of the character than they did.



I have no problem with Picard kicking some serious ... whenever he needs to. That fits in with what we know of him. I do have a bit of a problem with him jumping into 'action hero' mode when it's not necessary, for example when deploying the Argos in NEM. That's something I wouldn't have expected of series Picard.



It's a good episode. The only thing that doesn't really feel 'right' with me is how the Klingons came so close to defeating the Federation, when it seems that in the TNG main timeline, they seem to take a bit of a backseat to the Federation in terms of power.

Narendra 3 can likely be considered a decision point in terms of how the three main powers developed.

In our timeline, we ally with the Klingons, push back the Romulans, and then the Klingons begin an era of relative peace and whatever the term for the opposite of expansionism is and so they become "lazy" and "slovenly" and all the other complaints about K'Mpec and Gowron's Chancellorships and so they scale back production of their fleets, their warriors become less well honed etc.

At the same time, the Federation enters a genuine period of safety, no longer having to battle on two fronts, and so their fleet production grows, they are training more and more officers and expanding fairly rapidly (some of this is inferred rather than explicitly stated) which brings strength through numbers but also through discovering/acquiring via treaty/stumbling across new technologies which allow them to stand dominant by the 2360's.

In the Yesterday's timeline, the Federation is simply not ready for a war and so whilst the odd Galaxy class gets built the size and scale of the fleet isn't what it should have been.

The Klingon's are also able to rally, Duras doesn't become a meddling shitbag (or if he does then the focus on warrior tradition over politics means someone uses his body to practise Bat'leth acupuncture) and so they retain unity, and they have the Federation's technological golden age instead so maybe the Nheg'var gets developed sooner or something?

A fair bit of assumption/head canoning but I reckon it is possible to square the circle on this
 
He was ready to sacrifice his son for the Prophets, even if it was under some misguided notion that 'the Prophets will protect him'. That is NOT the father we have seen and loved for (at that point) 6 years.
If only there was some sort of precedent. Like Lincoln? Wait, that's not it, but I just know the name is close...

Profit and Lace is a middle of the road terrible Ferengi episode. It's Bosom Buddies with Ferengi. Drag for comedic purposes. Tale and old as time. It's only in current culture that it suddenly crosses lines.

The only thing I remember about any of the Ferengi eps in DS9 is that there were two or three that I didn't hate. But I can't tell you which ones they are.
 
A more recent controversial Trek opinion of mine: There wasn't much to PIC S3 besides the fanwank.
There was definitely a lot of recycled themes, which was a bit disappointing.... even though I thought it was much better than S1/S2. But in hindsight, its because it was memberberry overload.

Im saying this in contrast to the shorts we have been teased with from OTOY / Roddenberry Archive.
 
A more recent controversial Trek opinion of mine: There wasn't much to PIC S3 besides the fanwank.
I'll finally be able to create a scale using "Most" to "Least". DSC S4-S5 will be "Least", PIC S3 will be "Most", and everything else will be somewhere in-between.

Broad-Stroke Spoilers for Picard Season 3:
If you're only a fan of TNG, and you haven't seen it in 20 or 30 years, and you're watching Picard Season 3 because someone recommended it to you, you'll be totally lost if you haven't seen DS9 or VOY and don't know how they end. Picard Season 3 assumes you've seen everything. At least everything from the '80s-'90s generation of Star Trek. And they don't really bring anyone up to speed who hasn't or doesn't remember.
 
Last edited:
I'll finally be able to create a scale using "Most" to "Least". DSC S4-S5 will be "Least", PIC S3 will be "Most", and everything else will be somewhere in-between.

Broad, Non-Detailed Spoilers that for PIC Season 3:
If you're only a fan of TNG, and you haven't seen it in 20 or 30 years, and you're watching Picard Season 3 because someone recommended it to you, you'll be totally lost if you haven't seen DS9 or VOY and know how they end. Picard Season 3 assumes you've seen everything. At least everything from the '80s-'90s generation of Star Trek. And they don't really bring anyone up to speed who hasn't or doesn't remember.
Actually, I haven't seen the VOY eps but was able to follow it fine.
 
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the Omicron Ceti III colonists not “accomplishing” anything, so long as they didn’t want to. What Starfleet should have done is given everyone freed from the spores full information on the situation, then slowed anyone who wanted to to be re-spored and returned to the planet, with buoys set up in orbit warning approaching ships of the effects that both Berthold rays and the spores would have. In fact, since there are 24th-century-shows’ references to people being born there or the system serving as a resort, I expect that something of this sort is what happened.
 
I appreciate that they honored the fans by skipping all the necessary exposition, or wasting precious time getting the uninitiated up to speed.
 
I appreciate that they honored the fans by skipping all the necessary exposition, or wasting precious time getting the uninitiated up to speed.
It's not that I don't, I love PIC Season 3, but I feel like I can't show it to friends (who are TNGers) who not only haven't kept up with Picard but also haven't kept up with most Star Trek since 1994 except for the movies.

But what @Commander Troi said about not having seen some key episodes makes me think, "Why not?" I won't mention anything if they don't.
 
Connor Trinneer would’ve been a much better casting choice for playing Captain Archer than the Quantum Leap bloke.
 
Last edited:
If I could go back in time and change ENT's setup, I would replace Montgomery with a much older actor with more gravitas and make Mayweather the captain. Bakula could pilot the ship if he wanted or be replaced with someone else if not.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top