Drive sections are made of meat and saucers sections are made of pie.
Picard: Geordi, why the *beep* does half of this Enterprise-D "rebuild" look like it was made of cardboard?My headcanon is that the Syracuse's saucer section was destroyed in the Dominion War but the secondary hull mostly undamaged, hence Geordi's opportunity to pair it with the Enterprise saucer.
Picard: Geordi, why the *beep* does half of this Enterprise-D "rebuild" look like it was made of cardboard?
La Forge: Oh you didn't know did you? The Syracuse was one of those ships like the 1701 that for some reason got a complete interior redesign every few years. The Syracuse was in the "retro" interior design at the time of salvage. Imagine if I grabbed the saucer section of Pike's Enterprise as it looked in 2259 and jammed it into the stardrive section of the USS Defiant as it looked in 2268 when it disappeared in a Tholian web. Like that.
Picard:![]()
It’s low? The only numbers I can remember are 1701 and NX-01.That confused me as well but maybe NCC-17744 was an unused registry and Starfleet just stuck the number on the Syracuse because, well, the needs of bureaucracy.
Naaah, it's obviously the Klingons having conquered the engineering section while the Federation holds on in the saucer section. But because Data said at the end of last episode that the Federation appears to have lost the war for the ship and the zoomed-in-on section of the Master Systems Display that had only showed the neck section throughout the entire season was completely painted red, now half the fandom is complaining that Picard's admission in the teaser of this week's episode that the Klingons only managed to capture the secondary hull is apparently a retcon despite no one ever having said they have ever entered the saucer let alone taken the bridge.Looks to me like the damn Republicans have the whole secondary hull locked up. Hope more crew are in the primary hull or this is headed to the Federation Supreme Court.
It’s low? The only numbers I can remember are 1701 and NX-01.![]()
Naaah, it's obviously the Klingons having conquered the engineering section while the Federation holds on in the saucer section. But because Data said at the end of last episode that the Federation appears to have lost the war for the ship and the zoomed-in-on section of the Master Systems Display that had only showed the neck section throughout the entire season was completely painted red, now half the fandom is complaining that Picard's admission in the teaser of this week's episode that the Klingons only managed to capture the secondary hull is apparently a retcon despite no one ever having said they have ever entered the saucer let alone taken the bridge.
I think we really do have to look at hull registries as not being always sequential, with new ships given much lower hull numbers than older ones at times.Why is the Syracuse's registry number so low? Could it have been a tribute to an older ship but there was no outstanding heroism with the originals demise to warrant a lettered suffix??
Yes I know the reg numbers aren't specifically proven to be chronological but there is clearly an underlying reason why all ships from the 23rd century have 4 digit codes while ships of the 24th have 5. Soon in the early 25th Century we will have an NCC-100000!
There's a precedent for that in the real world. There are ships in the US Navy with higher hull numbers that have been already commissioned and deployed at sea while there are ships with lower hull numbers that are still "on order."That confused me as well but maybe NCC-17744 was an unused registry and Starfleet just stuck the number on the Syracuse because, well, the needs of bureaucracy.
I don't mind that but I take issue with the US Navy and other modern or historical military organisations always being used as a point of reference or as an explanation for canon contradictions. Starfleet might have used military comparisons in TOS so the audience would have something to relate to, but Starfleet has evolved and changed a lot since it started. Look at TNG, you can't tell me putting kids on a Starship is motivated my a military agenda, or that the US absorbs independant nations like the Federation. The terms 'USS' and 'United Earth' most likely have no in-universe relation to US Navy ships or the US in general. Yes starships carry weapons, yes they have been used in wars - doesn't make them a military organisation. In 1966 the concept of Sci-fi was a lot less refined and a lot less popular. The public needed a comparison of Captain Kirk to the Captain of a US Navy ship. I would argue that we don't need these sorts of obvious relatable nods in modern Sci-fi anymore and if they are in there they shouldnt be taken as a direct link to the contemporary military. Any similarities are co-incidental at best, given the Eugenics wars/world war 3. MAD and all that. As far as we know from canon sources the US Military was all but obliterated by nuclear war as with most of the other international powers and Zefram Cochrane was lucky enough to find a missile that had never been launched. That missile became the first warp ship and boom Star Trek as we know it was born. It is even dubious if the nation states still exist in society in the 23rd/24th/25th centuries. For all we know the United Earth is the name of the single nation to exist on planet earth. Sorry to all you USA patriots out there but it's doubtful anything meaningful from your military was carried over into our Trek aside from the letters USS and rank designations.
Perhaps the first Captain can order a number that has some meaning to them, like we can get custom car license plates, as long as they're not used alreadyNobody can tell me the U.S.S. Grissom was so old that it's NCC-638 registry reflected its actual age. Some ships just use lower, previously unassigned vessel numbers on their hulls.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.