• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Picard News & Reviews from Outside Sources

It was also entirely wrongheaded, and an embarrassment. "There are bad people on both sides."

Gene Coon's original concept was a simple parable addressing in a general sense- ethnic, tribal, or religious sectarian hatreds. Coon's beings resembled devils and angels. The director, very late in the game, added the black/white skin tone component.
 
No, it wasn't. It was allegory for how unfettered animosity over superficial differences would eventually destroy a society. And watching the kind of people that like STD and pontificate about their virtue signaling, its obvious the writers were correct.

Says the brand new account which pops up complaining about ideology and virtue signalling (yet conspicuously failing to define such) and talking about the "kind of people" who like a show you don't.

You are going out of your way to be divisive, yet do it in such a clumsy fashion that it'd almost be amusing if it wasn't rooted in bigotry.
 
Says the brand new account which pops up complaining about ideology and virtue signalling (yet conspicuously failing to define such) and talking about the "kind of people" who like a show you don't.

You are going out of your way to be divisive, yet do it in such a clumsy fashion that it'd almost be amusing if it wasn't rooted in bigotry.
There's no such thing as virtue signaling, it's a word the haters made up to feel comfortable with themselves being incomplete while other, smarter and more well rounded human beings actually have original ideas about compassion and diversity.

Most of these people have vast gaps in their upbringing and knowledge and can't hope to understand what they're missing. It's sad, but some can be saved.
 
There's no such thing as virtue signaling, it's a word the haters made up to feel comfortable with themselves being incomplete while other, smarter and more well rounded human beings actually have original ideas about compassion and diversity.

Go watch a female swimmer get assaulted by biological males for daring to question whether it's fair for biological females to be forced to compete against biological males.

Then come back and tell me all about this alleged "compassion and diversity."
 
You are going out of your way to be divisive, yet do it in such a clumsy fashion that it'd almost be amusing if it wasn't rooted in bigotry.

If that word still meant anything, I might be offended by that. But when it's used so casually for everyone that disagrees with your viewpoint it becomes too watered down to have have any value.
 
He did mention in season 1 of speaking at conferences so it's not like he had no life and never left the vineyard. He may have pursued other interests in the 15 or years or so since he resigned...when we catch up with Picard in season 1 he is very ill with the syndrome and already literally days away from dying from it.

Starfleet is also all he had ever known since he became a young adult so it's not surprising he wouldn't find something else in his later years that felt the same for him.

Excellent point, although let's bear in mind that his first body's eventual death from Irumadic Syndrome at the end of S1 was likely brought on in significant part due to the enormous physical and psychological stress he was under for the entire season. He was a 96-year-old man who went from spending most of the last 15 years in semi-retirement to being injured in an explosion, the target of an attempted assassination in his own home, forced to confront the sentient cost of his abandonment of the Romulans at Vashti, almost shot down over Vashti, infiltrated an organized crime syndicate on Freecloud, suffered a PTSD relapse upon being forced to board a Borg ship for the first time in over thirty years, narrowly escaped death aboard the Artifact again, uncovered a Zhat Vash infiltration of Starfleet and the truth behind one of the most devastating terrorist attacks in Federation history, was being held prisoner and then almost getting shot out of the sky over Coppellius twice... the man went through a lot that season!

It's entirely possible that his original body might have survived for years to follow if he hadn't been putting himself into such enormously stressful, injurious situations.
 
Why not both?

Let’s entertain this idea. Both Chabon and Abrams had terrible ideas for Trek, and those ideas are retconned out of existence for the sake of the exercise.

No Picard meltdown in an interview. No destruction of Mars or Romulan supernova. No swearing admirals or scientists. Raffi’s not drug addicted. Elnor does not decapitate anyone. Rios doesn’t smoke. Seven is accepted and a part of Starfleet. Icheb, Bruce Maddox, Thad Riker and Hugh all live. There are no extra dimensional synths, and a proper fleet comes to the rescue of Picard.

Just Picard solving a mystery around Soji, with the antagonists being Zhat Vash, and the story ending on Coppelius.

Fans would be asking why does Picard have Romulan housekeepers if the Neutral Zone is still around. Why the Federation is okay with it, even though they were allies during the Dominion War and relations were thawing at the end of NEM? And would still wonder why he left them behind, even though Starfleet would probably still be sensitive about letting former Tal Shiar onboard Federation starships.

There’d be fans wondering why an admiral allowed Picard to command an Inquiry-class ship after being retired for two decades just because he asked to. And if this was a common occurrence in Starfleet.

There’d be fans wonder what Elnor would have done if that Romulan on Vashti hadn’t chosen to live. Fans would similarly be wondering if Seven would have used the highest setting on her phaser rifle on her ex-girlfriend and vaporized her, and if her ex-girlfriend would really bring significant harm to Icheb.

Fans would be wondering when would they get to see cadet Thad Riker in action, and why Riker and Troi would settle down and raise Kestra in such a remote place. And they'd still be wondering what happened with Ba'ku.

Fans would be wondering in the Federation was really comfortable with a Borg Cube in Romulan space, and with Hugh overseeing the rehabilitation of the Xbs, when they initially wanted to use Hugh to wipe out the Borg. And without Federation oversight.

Fans would be wondering why Oh didn’t have Jurati kill Maddox. And speculating about the Maddox-Jurati-Rios love triangle, with shipping wars beginning.

They’d still be wondering what happened to Commodore Oh and what became of Zhat Vash, since they still infiltrated three major powers, plus the Gorn Hegemony. And wonder what happened to Narek. And would still be fine with Narissa biting the bust at the hands of Seven.

Meanwhile, the writers would still come up with the synth body for Picard to account for his Irumodic Syndrome. And would still have that interaction with Data.

Basically, some fans would be surprised that life wasn’t still dark years removed from the Dominion War. Even though it would be many years removed from that event for everyone to recover. There would be detractors wondering why the show is so light in tone. Even though that's Star Trek. Much like Picard going on an adventure outside of Starfleet is also Star Trek.

And the finale would be more or less the same as what we got. And the fans would still want the TNG reunion.

We'd still end up in the same place we are now.
 
Last edited:
Let’s entertain this idea. Both Chabon and Abrams had terrible ideas for Trek, and those ideas are retconned out of existence for the sake of the exercise.

No Picard meltdown in an interview. No destruction of Mars or Romulan supernova. No swearing admirals or scientists. Raffi’s not drug addicted. Elnor does not decapitate anyone. Rios doesn’t smoke. Seven is accepted and a part of Starfleet. Icheb, Bruce Maddox, Thad Riker and Hugh all live. There are no extra dimensional synths, and a proper fleet comes to the rescue of Picard.

Just Picard solving a mystery around Soji, with the antagonists being Zhat Vash, and the story ending on Coppelius.

Fans would be asking why does Picard have Romulan housekeepers if the Neutral Zone is still around. Why the Federation is okay with it, even though they were allies during the Dominion War and relations were thawing at the end of NEM? And would still wonder why he left them behind, even though Starfleet would probably still be sensitive about letting former Tal Shiar onboard Federation starships.

There’d be fans wondering why an admiral allowed Picard to command an Inquiry-class ship after being retired for two decades just because he asked to. And if this was a common occurrence in Starfleet.

There’d be fans wonder what Elnor would have done if that Romulan on Vashti hadn’t chosen to live. Fans would similarly be wondering if Seven would have used the highest setting on her phaser rifle on her ex-girlfriend and vaporized her, and if her ex-girlfriend would really bring significant harm to Icheb.

Fans would be wondering when would they get to see cadet Thad Riker in action, and why Riker and Troi would settle down and raise Kestra in such a remote place. And they'd still be wondering what happened with Ba'ku.

Fans would be wondering in the Federation was really comfortable with a Borg Cube in Romulan space, and with Hugh overseeing the rehabilitation of the Xbs, when they initially wanted to use Hugh to wipe out the Borg. And without Federation oversight.

Fans would be wondering why Oh didn’t have Jurati kill Maddox. And speculating about the Maddox-Jurati-Rios love triangle, with shipping wars beginning.

They’d still be wondering what happened to Commodore Oh and what became of Zhat Vash, since they still infiltrated three major powers, plus the Gorn Hegemony. And wonder what happened to Narek. And would still be fine with Narissa biting the bust at the hands of Seven.

Meanwhile, the writers would still come up with the synth body for Picard to account for his Irumodic Syndrome. And would still have that interaction with Data.

Basically, some fans would be surprised that life wasn’t still dark years removed from the Dominion War. Even though it would be many years removed from that event for everyone to recover. There would be detractors wondering why the show is so light in tone. Even though that's Star Trek. Much like Picard going on an adventure outside of Starfleet is also Star Trek.

And the finale would be more or less the same as what we got. And the fans would still want the TNG reunion.

We'd still end up in the same place we are now.
Meh, not a given. Chabon's tenure had more consistent writing than season 3, without a doubt. It was also successful by every metric.

Abrams also produced the most popular and most revenue earning fims in the history of the franchise. Also successful in every metric.

Therefore your premise is faullty. Case dismissed. I didn't read the rest of your post because I assumed increasingly wild, escalating innacuracy.
 
In a Hollywood Reporter article about THE MANDALORIAN, they did have this paragraph about season 3:

Weirdly, while all this is happening, Star Wars’ decades-old rival legacy franchise, Star Trek, is experiencing the exact opposite phenomenon with its current TV offering. The third and final season of Paramount+’s Picard is generating near-universal acclaim after many fans and critics found the show’s first two seasons messy and disappointing (they averaged a mere 57 percent audience score — the exact same as Mando season three). The new season’s audience score shot up to 89 percent and its critics score stands at 98 percent. Picard season three has generated so much excitement that Paramount announced on Tuesday the show’s final two episodes will be streamed in Imax theaters on April 19.
 
Says the brand new account which pops up complaining about ideology and virtue signalling (yet conspicuously failing to define such) and talking about the "kind of people" who like a show you don't.

You are going out of your way to be divisive, yet do it in such a clumsy fashion that it'd almost be amusing if it wasn't rooted in bigotry.

Why are you even talking about the age of someone's account as if it has any bearing on the content of what they're writing? What a clown.
 
Meh, not a given. Chabon's tenure had more consistent writing than season 3, without a doubt. It was also successful by every metric.

Abrams also produced the most popular and most revenue earning fims in the history of the franchise. Also successful in every metric.

Therefore your premise is faullty. Case dismissed. I didn't read the rest of your post because I assumed increasingly wild, escalating innacuracy.

The Abrams Star Trek movies blew. None of them were successful by any artistic metric.
 
Abrams also produced the most popular and most revenue earning fims in the history of the franchise. Also successful in every metric.
And beautiful films to boot, and one of my favorite Trek stories with Kirk. I still go back to much of the speeches in those films.

Beautiful work.
 
I think it is unfair to bring up how much money the Abrams movies made. They also had budgets (both marketing/movie) that far exceeded any Trek before them. I imagine Generations and First Contact were significantly more profitable at the box office.
 
You are mistaken.

Ah, our newest class of young TrekBBS cadets today clearly anticipates a short victorious war.

My current theory is it is someone who has been put on reply ban and has created another account to circumvent the ban and rage post with an even higher level of petulance
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top