Absolutely. They should give me what I want, and I'm sure everyone else will learn to love it too.The worst mistake P+ and Kurtzman could make is trying to develop every show from the foundation of “what the fans want.”

Absolutely. They should give me what I want, and I'm sure everyone else will learn to love it too.The worst mistake P+ and Kurtzman could make is trying to develop every show from the foundation of “what the fans want.”
As much as I agree I also genuinely feel this is the current trend.
We'll never know if that could've been any good or not.Legacy? Why don't we roll out George Takei for a Captain Sulu series while we're at it?
They’ve already infantilised the franchise with the cartoon shows.Time now for “Star Trek:saved by the bell.”
Indeed. Which is why it is hilarious to see arguments around "What fans want."
Because fans want multitude of different things, sometimes contradictory, and rarely in complete agreement.
Thus far the assumption is 32nd century. Matalas tweeted something about it and press blurb hints at it.Tell me, in what era will academy will put into? The 32nd Century?
Apparently also EnsignWho is proven on the Titan? Shaw and Seven?
My mistake. I clearly forgot about them, even though they're super memorable.Apparently also Ensign"This One Time at Band Camp""I Have a Famous Dad," the dramatically staring Bajoran guy and the other two who just recite technobabble and jargon.
There’s nothing to suggest Picard S3 has made any mainstream breakthrough, and thus no compelling commercial reason to have a spin-off of it. If anyone is in a position to know that, it’s Paramount.
Technically the Abrams Films but, as far as TV, no.Has any Trek really had a “mainstream breakthrough” since TNG?
Technically the Abrams Films but, as far as TV, no.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.