Trek doesn't have robots? 

Novels based on the Captain Proton franchise.Aside from what replaces Trek in their universe's 20th/21st century, what soft sci fi will they be reading in the 22nd onward? (that would be the opposite of "hard" sci fi?)
Is that the difference?Yes, a few robots did appear. But aside from androids such as Data, we didn't see much like Robbie the robot, or the robot from Lost in Space.
Is that the difference?
I always confuse my robots, my androids and whatnots.
Thank you.Technically, an android is a humanlike robot, but generally "robot" is reserved for the non-human-appearing ones (per the convention established by Edmond Hamilton's Captain Future pulp novels).
You seem very certain of this. I think that when we finally learn to communicate with the whales, they will disagree with your stance.
Trek doesn't have robots?![]()
That's rather humanity-centric to assume they need physical technology to have a civilization, or even fire.Whales may be intelligent, but they will never develop a civilization. First, they lack dexterous hands (or any similar thing) to manipulate objects. And second, which is the backbone element that helped us to develop tools that could not be simply found in the wild? Fire. You won't find any fire under the sea. Without fire, you can be a race of Einsteins and yet you would never get to the Copper Age.
That's rather humanity-centric to assume they need physical technology to have a civilization, or even fire.
Think of all the intelligent aliens in Trek who don't need these things, yet who would argue that they're not a civilization? You need the social things as well, and it's pretty obvious that whales have some of what we would deem necessary from a social aspect to be civilized.
It is perfectly fine to consider alternative ways for an intelligent species to develop a civilization... but they have to be workable ones.
![]()
It is perfectly fine to consider alternative ways for an intelligent species to develop a civilization... but they have to be workable ones.
![]()
Thank you, @Christopher.I think it might be possible for a species in an environment where fire can't occur (either underwater or in a different atmosphere) to devise alternatives. I once wrote a story (unpublished) about such a species that got its heat from geothermal sources. I think I once had an idea for a species that invented parabolic mirrors to focus sunlight, maybe carved from crystal or something.
One can also question how the word "civilization" is being defined. Literally, the word refers to a community that builds and inhabits cities, but it can be used more generally to mean any large-scale social organization that generates and preserves cultural knowledge, ideas, and innovation. The question is, is material technology the only standard by which civilization can be defined? If a species has a complex culture based on communication, ritual, and the verbal transmission of knowledge from generation to generation, could that be considered a form of civilization?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.