• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Would 'Assignment Earth' really make it as a series?

The only thing we know for certain is that Gary Seven has knowledge of Vulcans. Knowing that humans and Vulcans hadn't yet made contact in the 20th century, he logically assumes the Enterprise and its crew are from the future.
The language "in this time period" implies a knowledge of other time periods. edited to add: Also, he's about to speak of events in that period in the past tense.

In any case, that's hardly stressing that Gary is not a time traveler.
 
Last edited:
I always think of it as a chimping noise. I don't know what else to call it? The sound of the gears and motors in his leg pulling him along. In the early episodes it sounded only when he was lifting anything mechanical or extremely heavy itself before it started to be used at every opportunity!
JB
 
I liked "Assignment: Earth" as an episode a lot. I like Gary Seven as someone who's technically a Human but also an Outsider, Roberta Lincoln had a strong personality, and I think it could've worked as a series. I could see something like this in the late-'60s and early-'70s. BUT, I don't think Gene Roddenberry could carry it all by himself. I think he'd have to have some other people to make it work. A spy series doesn't seem to have been his speed. You'd want to have someone where that's in their zone.

TOS had allegory. With Assignment: Earth, they could've dropped the allegory and dealt with issues openly that directly effected Earth at the time, instead of using the fig-leaf of another planet. That's one advantage a series like this would've had over Star Trek.
 
Last edited:
And the Federation said there isn't or never was or has ever been a planet at those coordinates. Gary states it will remain hidden from them even in their time. But was it ever found in TNG or Picard's time? :ack:
JB
 
I didn't think so but wasn't there some hints in the last episode of Picard:Season Two?
JB
They touch upon what they call "The Watchers" but they never mention the location of what planet they're from. All Picard knows about the Supervisors comes from what he knows from Kirk's logs.
 
BUT, I don't think Gene Roddenberry could carry it all by himself. I think he'd have to have some other people to make it work. A spy series doesn't seem to have been his speed. You'd want to have someone where that's in their zone.

I dunno. The '67 series prospectus document describes the intended tone of A:E as a modern-day Have Gun, Will Travel, the series that Roddenberry wrote for the most often before his producer days (to the point that I've seen him described at its story editor, though he wasn't credited as such). It likened Seven to HGWT's Paladin, a cool, hyper-competent, rational man who comes onto the scene and uses his intellect and skills to solve people's problems. So I think he intended something very much in his "zone."

I agree that Roddenberry would've needed a good collaborator to pull it off, but not because of its genre or focus, simply because he wasn't that great a writer. As I mentioned before, I think "The Cage" is the only really good solo science fiction script he ever wrote, and the weakest of his '70s pilots, Genesis II, was the one he wrote solo, while the strongest, The Questor Tapes, was co-written with Gene L. Coon.

In the case of A:E, presumably Art Wallace would've been Roddenberry's main collaborator, in the equivalent role to Coon or John Meredyth Lucas in Trek. So the quality of the show would've probably come down to how good Wallace was.


TOS had allegory. With Assignment: Earth, they could've dropped the allegory and dealt with issues openly that directly effected Earth at the time, instead of using the fig-leaf of another planet. That's one advantage a series like this would've had over Star Trek.

On the contrary -- it would've been a distinct disadvantage. The whole reason that 1960s producers like Roddenberry and Rod Serling turned to science fiction was because networks and advertisers shied away from controversial subject matters, so the only way to get them on the air at all was to cloak them in SF/fantasy metaphors. When Roddenberry made his modern-day series The Lieutenant, he famously had to fight to get the episode "To Set It Right" (with Nichelle Nichols & Don Marshall) on the air due to its story about racism. He realized it was easier to get such stories past the censors if they were allegorical instead of direct, hence his turn to science fiction. (Or at least that's how he told it after the fact. Knowing Roddenberry's tendencies to exaggerate his own biography, I sometimes suspect he was just copying Rod Serling's story.)
 
It might have been easier if it were produced in the early 1970s when 'relevant' shows like All in the Family began presenting depicting current issues.
 
In an alternate reality where TOS runs five seasons and Gene Roddenberry convinces NBC to give Assignment: Earth a second chance, that would put us right in 1971.
 
In an alternate reality where TOS runs five seasons and Gene Roddenberry convinces NBC to give Assignment: Earth a second chance, that would put us right in 1971.

Well, if TOS had been successful enough to last that long, I have no doubt they wouldn't have stopped at five seasons. I mean, this was the era of TV where you had Run for Your Life, a 3-season series about a guy with 18 months to live, and M*A*S*H, an 11-season series about a 3-year war. Today's TV shows are precious about "real-time" chronology, tending to assume that every episode takes place on its airdate, but back then, TV shows tended to exist in a timeless present. The "5-year mission" would've kept going as long as they kept renewing the series.

So if ST had been that big a hit (and it would've had to be, since hardly any genre show back then ever made it to 5 or more years), then Roddenberry would've had the clout to get A:E made alongside it, rather than replacing it. So he wouldn't have needed to wait until '71.

Although, of course, Roddenberry did make another stab at the premise behind A:E in 1973, just replacing Gary with an android in The Questor Tapes. And that actually did get a series pickup, but Roddenberry walked away when the network demanded dropping Jerry and retooling it into a Fugitive clone. So they ended up doing The Six Million Dollar Man instead.
 
If only the slowest-moving TV ''thriller'' ever had matched the intensity of its title sequence.

I dunno, it wasn't paced that differently from any other '70s adventure show, back when people still had attention spans. Sure, it had the long slow-motion bionic sequences, but the reason it latched onto slow motion as an action-scene device is because that was already done by a number of productions in the '70s.

Besides, even when the slowed-down action scenes dragged, Oliver Nelson's music kept it lively.
 
The issue with showing Steve Austin running at high speed is it cannot look right just by speeding up the footage. Because if you were were actually running faster your legs would be pushing you off with more force and thus you’d have much longer strides than normal running. It certainly would make turning awfully…interesting.
 
My father claimed the actual reason was Lee Majors was in no mood to do any more heavy-duty running after the opening credits, so we were treated to weekly aaaaaccccccttttiiiiiioooooonnnnnn sssssscccccceeeeennnnneeeessssss due to Majors' laziness.

Well, that's ridiculous and petty. Majors obviously did a ton of running and jumping, and you can tell from his body language that he was definitely running for real, even if it was slowed down. I mean, come on, Majors was a track and football star in high school and college until an injury ended his sports career. He's gonna be afraid of running?


The issue with showing Steve Austin running at high speed is it cannot look right just by speeding up the footage. Because if you were were actually running faster your legs would be pushing you off with more force and thus you’d have much longer strides than normal running.

Yes. It looked silly and sitcommy the few times they tried it.
 
Further Off Topic: If memory serves, Harve Bennett said he got the idea to use slow motion in TSMDM after seeing its use in football films produced by the sport's production company NFL Films.

Sir Rhosis
 
Last edited:
The issue with showing Steve Austin running at high speed is it cannot look right just by speeding up the footage. Because if you were were actually running faster your legs would be pushing you off with more force and thus you’d have much longer strides than normal running. It certainly would make turning awfully…interesting.

That's exactly right. Fast-motion film ("undercranking") doesn't just speed up the man running, it also increases the speed at which gravity pulls him down at each stride. And that looks phony because everybody knows the acceleration due to gravity at sea level is 9.8 meters per second, per second. At least, they know what looks right and what doesn't. Fast motion blows away this rule of physics, while real bionic strength would have to obey it.

Apart from running, this gravity error also messed up the scene where Steve Austin jumped rope at bionic speed.

But the strangest bionic artifact occurred in a slow motion scene in "The Seven Million Dollar Man." When Steve fought Barney in the sub-basement vault room, the set was apparently a real place and not just a studio creation, because it was lit with fluorescent lights. And the frames per second of the slo-mo resonated with the cycles per second of the overhead lighting, causing a continuous, slow flicker.
 
The most convincing shot, maybe the only one, of Steve running at speed was in the opening credits where we appear to be tracking Steve close up and the background and surroundings looks blurred. Seems to be the only time it ever looked reasonably right.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top