Yeah I almost feel like they were gonna use the original Titan then decided on Neo Constitution after scripts were locked and filming had started then came up with this idea. There’s no reason for the -A if it’s the same ship refitted. Not a deal breaker but……really reaching a bit.I really don't understand why Matalas and the production team are obsessed with term "refit"???!!!
They had to make up some silly and stupid backround story about new cutting-edge technology that turns an old ship into a new one. What is the purpose of all this? So much work and effort to leave Riker's Titon skeleton for Titan-A.
Today, when you build a stadium, it is much cheaper and more efficient to build a completely new stadium than to upgrade the old one. And why use an old skeleton in the 25th century, in the age of replicators, unlimited sources of materials and unlimited sources of energy??? Doesn't the skeleton also lose its quality and stability over time due to wars and battles? Totally unnecessary.
From the plane, you can see that Riker's Titan and this Titan-A have nothing to do with each other. Totally different concepts. They differ as much as Sisko's Defiant and Enterprise-D differ in design.
That was odd, especially given how explicitly they've been discussed as season 3 regulars in the lead-up.I do wonder why Jonathan and Gates were credited as "Special Guest Stars" and not part of the Main cast line up.
AGREED. It felt wrong and kind of disappointing to use that fanfare for a non-Enterprise ship.- I didn't feel like the Titan deserved the TMP/TNG fanfare upon its reveal. I've always felt that should be reserved for the Enterprise. Should have had its own theme.
They might have not been allowed to use the actual Titan since that is in Lower Decks. There is some weird thing about shows only allowed to use certain ships. The vfx artist tried to add a Parliament class ship in the fleet last season but was told to remove it.Yeah I almost feel like they were gonna use the original Titan then decided on Neo Constitution after scripts were locked and filming had started then came up with this idea. There’s no reason for the -A if it’s the same ship refitted. Not a deal breaker but……really reaching a bit.
Might also be the case that they didn’t use it to give Lower Decks exclusivity on its creative.Titan wasn't designed for Lower Decks.
Depends on if conception was when Bev was missing in Season 2 or Post Nemesis……I hate the whole Scrappy Doo concept if that’s indeed what they do here.Is Beverly's son supposed to be in his early twenties? No offence to the actor, but couldn't they have got someone younger (someone who isn't in his mid-thirties), to play the part?
D
Depends on if conception was when Bev was missing in Season 2 or Post Nemesis……I hate the whole Scrappy Doo concept if that’s indeed what they do here.
In my days working on a TV franchise, something like this actually became one of my rules of thumb for measuring a new showrunner. If that first script shows up, and he has written a shout-out to himself into it -- RED ALERT. I knew then my new boss was an arrogant nightmare and I was in for a world of shit.Oh and M’talas Prime? That’s annoying. Would have taken it down a full point but I’m feeling generous this morning.
You can sort of see Shaw's point of view though. If a retired Admiral, and a Captain with no command, suddenly turned up on the Enterprise D, and told Picard to change his orders, and go to a completely different region of space just on their sayso, I can't see him automatically going along with it.
In my days working on a TV franchise, something like this actually became one of my rules of thumb for measuring a new showrunner. If that first script shows up, and he has written a shout-out to himself into it -- RED ALERT. I knew then my new boss was an arrogant nightmare and I was in for a world of shit.
So I felt so sad when I saw M'Talas Prime! Heavy sigh and "he comes off so well in the press..."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.