• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How would you have made the TNG movies?

ananta

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
So let’s say you are the executive in charge of the four TNG movies. How would you make them better? Would you include any story arcs, and if so what? How would you handle the characters? What changes would you make to each film and would you scrap any of them altogether?

I’m curious to hear your thoughts.
 
How would I have done them? Better :-)

Snarkishness aside, something like this:
Generations: Redo everything after the loss of Kirk in the ribbon. Much less fan-service. More meaningful interactions between Kirk and Picard. Kirk dies as a hero, not as a schmuck falling off a bridge.
First Contact: wouldn't change too much in this one.
Insurrection: Consign the script to the trash heap of history. Produce a good movie from a good script.
Nemesis: Tough call. I think there's a good story hiding in there somewhere. My first thought is to remove the combat sequences, come up with some other physical conflict if needed, and focus on the relationship between Picard and Shinzon from a personal level.
 
There are changes I would make to each movie, but as the question is what would I do if I was in charge of all four movies, I would completely change them and take the opportunity to have some story arcs. I would want the movies to focus more on the TNG characters and not have as much action. One story arc would be Picard and Dr Crusher's relationship. Another would be Riker's career - at the start of the first movie Riker would have his own command and by the end of the last movie he would be promoted to Admiral. I know this would mean that Riker would probably have fewer scenes but I would want Frakes to direct so he would still be involved in the movies. When Riker leaves the Enterprise, Data would be promoted to first officer. I'm not a massive fan of the Klingons (I think they've been used too much overall) so the films wouldn't have the Klingons as the antagonists. I think a lot more could be done with the Romulans (I agree with ChallengerHK that there's a good story hiding somewhere in Nemesis) and Sela, Tomalak and Spock's reunification efforts were all mentioned in the TV show and something from that would make a good movie. There could be a Romulan arc, eg in movie one the Romulans are working behind the scenes and our heroes don't realise but in movie two they do realise the Romulans are behind it all.

I'm not sure when they finished writing Generations but it must have been before they wrote the last few episodes of season 7 and possibly before they wrote quite a lot of episodes of season 7. I would start making the movie shortly after TNG finished so it could use things from season 7.

Movies two and three have the challenge of taking place at the same time as DS9 without interferring with the world-building that was going on there, which may be why First Contact involves time travel and Insurrection is set somewhere very remote.
 
Generations - cut out everything with Kirk. Maybe still do an Enterprise B intro but have the ship just be on a routine mission. Also, axe the “leave the nexus anywhere/anytime” thing. Destruction of the E-D stays.

First Contact - no changes.

Insurrection - change it to a story following the Enterprise “in-action” during the Dominion War. A WW2 “men on a mission” style movie like The Dirty Dozen or Saving Private Ryan.

Nemesis - ground up, total do over. Drop everything aside from Riker and Troi getting married and maybe leave the Romulans as the antagonist. Make it a “fun” movie in the vein of Star Trek 4 after going so action heavy in FC and Insurrection.
 
I'm pretty sure I've done this before, but I don’t mind a 2023 revision.

GEN – Keep the orbital basejumping scenes that were cut to show Kirk struggling to adjust to retirement. Kirk is brought onto the Ent-D from the Nexus early in the movie. He adapts to the changes that have occurred in the 24th century (the holodeck, a Klingon Starfleet officer on the bridge, families onboard starships) and learns of the Ent-D crew meeting Bones, Scotty, and Spock. Kirk takes command on Ent-D bridge and defeats Lursa & B’Etor with an assist from Worf; while I would prefer the Ent-D to face down a D’deridex Warbird, if the studio insisted that it be a Klingon ship, then they face down a Vorcha attack cruiser. Kirk beams down to the surface afterwards to help Picard. Also, Picard envisions Beverly in the Nexus instead of a random redhead.

FC – The same, though rather than a new ship class altogether, just make the Ent-E a Galaxy class with Sovereign class reskin. I would not add a rival Earth faction that fights Cochrane’s faction, as I think that addition would dilute the film, IMO.

INS – This film could have been both the Dominion war film while also being the fun TNG classic episode it was intended to be. Ent-E picks up Worf and O’Brien (as well as Quark on Sisko’s request) on DS9 on a diplomatic mission to Ba'ku which is in neutral territory, but is also strategically important for medicinal care in both the Federation and Dominion. Lwaxana Troi is already at the Baku village on vacation, and is in a brief love triangle subplot with Picard and Anji in the first act. The Riker-Troi subplot remains. As does the regenerative properties of Ba’ku and its effects on the Ent-E crew.

Admiral Dougherty and a Vorta – who are the big bads instead of Ru’afo - are secretly colluding with each other, to use the Ent-E to remove and relocated the Ba’ku population ahead of a Dominion occupation of the planet. Reflecting on how the Federation has relocated its own citizens in the Demilitarized Zone and it led to the Maquis and their raids on both Cardassians and the Federation, Picard and the rest of the Ent-E crew refuse to follow Dougherty’s orders.

Instead of Son’a warships, its Dominion warships, and the Ent-E gets an assist from the Defiant in the Briar Patch. The Son’a and Ba’ku connection can still remain, with the Son’a confirmed to have migrated to the Gamma Quadrant and a member of the Dominion (maybe connect the Son'a joining the Dominion with failed negotiations with Captain Harriman on the Ent-B decades earlier), but its not the driving aspect of the film.

There would be cameos of Guls Macet and Madred.

NEM – The opening scene remains the same, while everything else changes. There is no Shinzon; its Tomalak working with Sela, Lore, Thomas Riker, Toral, Donatra and Senator Tal’Aura, all of whom work with the Remans to overthrow the Romulan government.

The cloning conspiracy remains, but expands beyond Picard; there are already clones of Sisko, Janeway, Spock, and Archer created, with the plan to use these clones to gain a foothold within the Federation, Bajor, and the Romulan Reunification movement; with the Archer clone, its to alter history if plans go awry, and by using the time travel trick Kirk used in TVH to go back. The Battle at the Bassen Rift is dumped completely – it’s a good idea, but too bleak for this film – for a battle over Betazed. This makes Troi (as well as Beverly) more valuable to the plot beyond her conflict with the Reman Viceroy as the threat of Thalaron on the planet looms over their heads.

B4 is replaced by Lore, and its Lore that is reset to the Data of TNG S1 at the end of the movie.

Wesley Crusher is the one blown out of the Ent-E into space during the battle with the Scimitar. Yes, he uses his Traveller powers to get onboard the Scimitar and rescue Picard.

Donatra and Sela turn on Tomalak and the other conspirators near the end of the movie.

The real Admiral Janeway is on the USS Archer with the VOY crew, and appears near the end of the film to assist Picard, Donatra, and Sela in the battle over Betazed.

A subplot is Archer alone is brought to the future (abducted while in his ready room), and is found by the Ent-E crew in the proximity of the body parts of Lore on the same planet. Picard takes note that the past has somewhat been changed (acknowledging real world concerns of the advanced look for the NX class, and presence of transporters and phasers) due to the events of FC. Instead of the preordained stuff in ENT of Archer being at the founding of the Federation and it doesn’t exist without him and he becomes Federation President, Picard simply warns Archer that Earth in Archer’s time is a few years away from a war with the Romulans and that conflict is pivotal to the founding of the Federation. And as Archer is also not allowed to know what a Romulan looks like, or the fate of his crew and his ship - as well as the ongoing threat of the cloning conspiracy - the Ent-E crew confine Archer to Ten Forward with only Guinan for company to make sure the timeline doesn’t change further. Its further implied that the NX-01 fought Romulans at some point in the Bassen Rift, thereby saving the Bassen Rift idea for that show. Archer is sent with Admiral Janeway, who figures out how to return Archer to his time. Basically, the purpose of this subplot is to set up the rest of ENT’s run by giving the show a general direction, and blessings by TNG to get a seven season run.
 
Generations should have been Yesterday's Enterprise writ large, much as TMP was "The Changeling". Full casts from both shows, fully set in both eras and using the classic movie Enterprise. A better villain (perhaps one better suited to McDowell's talents). And a few characters jumping times/ships. Worf on the A would be cool. Sulu helming the E, too.

First Contact is fine as it is.

Insurrection. Scrap the whole thing. Nothing redeemable there. Well, maybe the title. Needs a better set of "insurrectionists" and a reason to rebel. Perhaps something to do with the Maquis and the Cardassians (and DS9?) Not sure how that plays out in the timeline :lol:

Nemesis. Another gut job. No clones. No B-4. I do like using the Romulans. Make an actual Romulan Picard's nemesis. His opposite number. I'd suggest Tomalak, but they'd want a bigger name than Katsulas as the villian. After the Dominion War the Romulans decide to flex their muscles. Think Balance of Terror. A cat and mouse game with two skilled commanders.
 
Step 1: Wait a few years after S7 concluded. Let some separation occur for the audience. Absence makes the heart grow fonder.

Step 2: Hire a movie crew to write and direct, not television people. Keep Berman as an Executive Producer to provide consistency and to keep costs in line, like Bennett did for the TOS films, but don’t have him involved too much hands-on in the writing. Just providing oversight.

Step 3: Have a plan. Create a roadmap that shows where you want the story and characters to go over the course of the films. I’m not talking about a true “serialized continuation…” but just a general blueprint so things are more cohesive.

Step 4: Fight off studio interference and actor influence. Most of what went wrong in the existing TNG films was because of studio mandates and people like Stewart and Spiner throwing their weight around. Play hardball. Let the writers and directors tell their story, or don’t make the damn movie at all.

All this other stuff about how the plots of the individual movies should go is pretty much worthless and wanky unless you can nail these things down. I’d suggest all 4 films would have completely different stories and structures if you did the above.
 
Last edited:
GEN - I'd come up with a new story that introduces TNG to a strictly film audience. No fucking emotion chip. Either have TNG Uniforms or DS9 Uniforms, but not both.

I'd have nothing with the TOS characters because they said their goodbyes in the last movie. Killing Kirk and having the Enterprise-B so soon bottlenecked the in-universe era that came afterwards in retrospect. They capped things off with the TOS Movie Era a little too completely. I'm one of the people who thinks the first two seasons of DSC should've taken place after TUC and seeing the Enterprise-A in that show side-by-side with the Discovery would've been killer. The "10 years Pre-TOS" thing was something I turned a blind eye to, but it wouldn't have been my first choice. On the Abrams side of things, they could've worked in a flashback or cameo or holo-recording or whatever of Shatner's Kirk without having to worry about having him look like he did in the early-'90s.

FC - I wouldn't change a single thing.

INS - Page One Rewrite.

NEM - I like @Happy Xmas (War Is Over)'s take. So I'm going to say, "What he said!"

Step 2: Hire a movie crew to write and direct, not television people. Keep Berman as an Executive Producer to provide consistency and to keep costs in line, like Bennett did for the TOS films, but don’t have him involved too hands-on in the writing. Just providing oversight.
This too. There had to have been a lot of creative teams out there in the '90s who could've made a great series of movies.
 
Last edited:
I think the most important thing is for the TNG Movies to stand on their own without having to watch the series. I like to watch YouTube Reactions to various shows and movies. And I love when a 20-year-old is watching the Star Trek Movies or any type of Star Trek for the first time. I get to see a different take from unjaded eyes or people who know this stuff cold. Without fail, every time one of these reactors watches the Star Trek movies, they have to go back and watch episodes of TNG before going into those movies. They always watch "Q Who?" and "The Best of Both Worlds" (because that's what commenters will recommend), so they have a better perspective before watching First Contact, but sometimes they'll watch other episodes too.

With the TOS Movies, they give you enough information at the beginning, so the un-initiated don't go into them feeling lost. In TMP, they introduce all the characters one-by-one. In TWOK, they provide Khan's background from "Space Seed". In TSFS, they recap the end of TWOK. In TVH, they use the scene with the Federation Council to explain what happened in TSFS. They don't throw you right in.

In the TNG Movies, they throw you right in. And the Movie Audience is not always exactly the same as TV Audience. So if you're going into the TNG Movies cold, you have to play catch-up and a lot will be lost on you. When I was a sophomore in high school, one of my friends told me a newspaper review gave GEN a one-and-a-half star review. One-and-a-half out of four. I was thinking, "The movie can't be that bad..." and it wasn't, but this reviewer probably didn't have any perspective. I remember the reviewer saying, and I'm paraphrasing here, "If Data is the Spock of the '90s, then the '90s are screwed." They probably might not have seen much TNG if any, so all they knew of Data was from that movie, where he makes a fool of himself.
 
Patrick Stewart and Brent Spiner had too much input on all of them to the detriment of the rest of the cast but I don't know what you could reasonably do to fix that.
I'd give Brannon and Ron more time to write "Generations" and not have them do it at the same time as "All Good Things". If you're going to do a crossover TOS/TNG then actually do it with two Enterprises and two crews. Not some "Yesterday's Enterprise" type story though. Sure it's fanservice but I think Kirk being on the bridge of the E-D is the one time to do it. I think the E-D needed to go out better or at least have a better opponent. I'm not convinced they needed to kill Kirk.
I think First Contact is fine.
"Insurrection" should have been more like the "Stardust" draft and used the Romulans and the androids.
"Nemesis" should have been something else. John Logan and Stuart Baird should have been punched in the nuts. They should have driven the Argo off the cliff during production with everyone onboard.
 
The first thing I would do is write a different script for the TNG finale, and use All Good Things as the basis for the first TNG movie. It would take some rewriting to turn the AGT script into the script for a movie. But, to my taste, it's a fundamentally better story than Generations.

I don't have ideas what to do for the next three movies. I guess I kind of assume they would all be different stories, because the start of the TNG movie franchise was a different story..
 
I like the idea of giving it at least a year between AGT and Generations. Not to “make the heart grow fonder” but to give everyone time to breathe and ramp up production properly.

it’s never sat right with me that they were filming AGT while simultaneously tearing down/modifying the Enterprise sets for Generations. Plus it would have given Moore and Braga a chance to give the script another pass or two.
 
So let’s say you are the executive in charge of the four TNG movies. How would you make them better? Would you include any story arcs, and if so what? How would you handle the characters? What changes would you make to each film and would you scrap any of them altogether?

I’m curious to hear your thoughts.

1. no cast "F*R*I*E*N*D*S" reunion party-time feel that feels out of place
2. keep the characters true to theirselves, letting Riker do the action hero work since Picard never once convinced (NEM is mindful of this and, despite its flaws, does a better job with Picard than the previous TNG films)... the TNG films
2B. The TNG films lacked the grounding and expansiveness the TOS ones had... that needed to make a return. Certainly not more self-aware jokiness.
3. What @Paul755 said for GEN; it's a bit of a rushed mush, and Nimoy might have come back if it were more solid
4. Not chuck in so much plotting into FC, INS, and NEM - too many plot contrivances dragged them down and, per another thread about NEM, it had a lot already there - one rewrite would easily have tightened up the movie so beautifully (nix the lame "Shinzon the Reman prisoner built a perfect monster ship and nobody with their massive sensor arrays noticed" and equally bland "Picard is a clone and we need the original's blood" subplots, and go for a Romulan faction that renegade Shinzon was cultivating and, *ding*, a ***/********** movie becomes *********/********** for that alone. The contrivances would be removed, feel more naturally built up, and they can still have a backstory put in about a previous dealing with Picard if they're going to go for the ye-olde revenge trope Or better yet, the events that Troi was in "Sleeping with the Enemy" misfired and caused Shinzon's faction to rise. *Boom*. InstaWin. Oh wait, it's "Face of the Enemy". Naah, it's more fun the way I originally wrote it. It's not the worst movie ever made; since for a genre that's not my go-to, I still managed to stay awake through it all in the theater... Oh, the wonderfulness of 1991... but I digress. )
 
I'd have eliminated Kirk from Generations. After seven seasons and one-hundred-and-seventy-eight episodes, The Next Generation didn't need a symbolic 'passing of the flame' as it had already proven itself every bit the equal, and in some instances the better, of the original series.
 
I'd have eliminated Kirk from Generations. After seven seasons and one-hundred-and-seventy-eight episodes, The Next Generation didn't need a symbolic 'passing of the flame' as it had already proven itself every bit the equal, and in some instances the better, of the original series.

Totally agree. It was like a step back in many ways. They had seven seasons of material to fall back on - potential villains, new species etc there was no need to go back to the TOS cast. It was done, and and had a nice send off in the previous movie.
 
Totally agree. It was like a step back in many ways. They had seven seasons of material to fall back on - potential villains, new species etc there was no need to go back to the TOS cast. It was done, and and had a nice send off in the previous movie.

Exactly. TNG had long ago dispatched even the staunchest critic who felt they still needed TOS to hold its hand and say "this is Star Trek now".

My heart will always be with TOS, it's my favourite incarnation of the show by a country mile, but I think you could validly argue that even in 1994, TNG WAS Star Trek.
 
Lots of great comments here. I haven’t given it a huge amount of thought myself, but here’s how I’d probably have approached things had the studio given Rick Berman the heave ho and made my own good self the executive producer of these films.

GENERATIONS had potential but, in my opinion, needed lot of work. I know part of the problem was executive meddling and the writers were very much constrained by what they could and couldn’t do, but the plot could have been significantly improved. I shared my idea in another thread, but here goes again. Soren is basically manipulating temporal laws in a desperate bid to reopen the Nexus. As a result, he is inadvertently creating time distortions and shattering the fabric of space and time. Things from different time periods are emerging through dimensional tears—including the Enterprise A, which finds itself thrust into the 24th century and face to face with the Enterprise D. I’d have tried to get as many of the original cast back as possible because this would have been less a quick cameo and more of an Avengers style team up for the TOS and TNG crews.

The Enterprise A isn’t the only ship to be displaced in time and end up on the scene—Soren’s experiments unleash some nasty aliens from subspace which end up on a rampage of destruction. Both Enterprises have to team up to stop them while also finding Soren and putting an end to his temporal manipulations. I’d have had it end with an epic space battle to end all space battles with Kirk seemingly sacrificing himself to ensure victory. We’d intercut with the Nexus, which is gradually threatening to engulf reality and we’re not quite sure where reality and the fantasy of the Nexus begins and ends.

I’d kind of have an INCEPTION style ending where we’re not entirely sure what was real and what wasn’t all along. Nevertheless, the subspace aliens are defeated and sent back where they came, Soren is stopped and reality appears to restructure itself back to normal, with the Enterprise A returning to its own time. I’d leave Kirk’s death ambiguous and strongly hint that he wasn’t perhaps killed but simply pulled into the Nexus where he’s still alive and may one day return. He deserves a mythic, ambiguous fate.

FIRST CONTACT is a solid movie and was fairly well received by most, including critics if I recall. There are a number of plot holes I’d try to patch up, but it’s been a while since I’ve watched it so I’m not quite sure where I’d start. The only thing I’d definitely change would be the Borg Queen. I’d have made her FAR less camp and sexualised and much more alien, creepy and aloof. I’d really want her to chill your soul rather than strut about like a stereotypical femme fatale in a catsuit.

INSURRECTION…h’oh boy. I think I’d completely redo this one from scratch. I don’t really know if there’s much I could salvage with that story.

I’d probably make it hinge around the Dominion war, with the Enterprise on the front lines and coming across a Starfleet conspiracy to harvest some unique natural mineral or substance on the Baku planet (which is populated by billions of Baku rather than just a piddly little village). This substance, unavailable on any other known planet, could somehow turn the tide of the war by, I don’t know, making a new grade of weapon or starship propulsion. The war is at a crucial juncture and Starfleet really needs to gain the upper hand or risk extinction.

The Baku are intrinsically connected to their planet, perhaps as a result of its unique property, and can’t be relocated elsewhere. Picard uncovers a conspiracy within an increasingly desperate Starfleet to strip mine the planet regardless, and this may result in the widespread destruction of the Baku. Picard can’t accept this, resigns his commission and ends up taking a stand on the planet. That’s just as the Dominion arrive, also eager to acquire its resources and a ferocious battle takes place for the future of the world, both on land and in space. I haven’t thought about this much, but that would be my approach. Most of the humour in Insurrection was embarrassingly forced and naff, so I’d strip that shit right out and make this a tense and taut war movie with an unflinching exploration of ethics, morality and ideology.

By this point, by the way, I’d have split up the Enterprise crew. It strained credulity that the crew stayed together so long both in the TOS and TNG films. Realistically, the senior crew would have been promoted and assigned to different ships or roles rather than remaining in the same positions they’d had for decades on the Enterprise. In Insurrection, I’d have Picard deliberately recall his old bridge officers and the people he most trusted so we get a reunion. I’d also maybe include more connection to DS9 with Worf appearing again on the Defiant along with another DS9 crew member, perhaps O’Brien or Kira, both of whom have past experience defending planets in time of war.

NEMESIS…again, I’d pretty much gut this one. There’s some potential with the Picard clone idea, so I might explore that, only I’d probably have Patrick Stewart play a dual role. It’s great to see Tom Hardy in before he became a major star but he really doesn’t look, sound or act much like Patrick Stewart.

I’m not exactly sure how, but probably make this film more of a political conspiracy drama, and draw some inspiration from the Bourne franchise. I’d have Shinzon replace Picard, who is being kept prisoner on Romulus. I think it would be cool to spend some time on Earth as Riker and Data start uncovering evidence of a plot to compromise Starfleet at its heart, which leads them to uncover Shinzon posing as Jean-Luc.

After some cool chase scenes on 24th century Earth, Shinzon manages to escape after being discovered but not before Riker learns that the real Picard is being held on Romulus. With potential war looming with the Romulans, Starfleet decides it is too risky to mount a rescue mission, so Riker disobeys orders, assembles the old crew and, taking a leaf out of Kirk’s book, they steal the soon-to-be-decommissioned Enterprise E and head to Romulus. They end up having a huge showdown with Shinzon in space, while Picard finds allies willing to help him on Romulus, including an old pointy-eared ambassador he once met several years previously. I’d have made the studio give Leonard Nimoy whatever he wanted to reappear as Ambassador Spock!

Needless to say, I’d cut the entire B4 plot and Brent Spiner would just have to suck it up. Of course, I know from reading Michael Piller’s behind the scenes take on Insurrection just how much the actors and studio interfere with the story process, often much to its detriment. But that’s how I’d have tried to approach things. I’d include a number of cameos from DS9 and VOY characters in this one and had some fun exploring the inner workings of Starfleet command and making it a galaxy hopping romp with a race against time to prevent an interstellar war. Data wouldn’t die—nobody needed to see a third rate knock off of TWOK. I’d have it end on a far more triumphant and uplifting note.
 
Generations - I feel like you gotta do a Kirk/Picard crossover. Whether it's Picard and Kirk, Batman and Superman, Frankenstein and the Wolfman, crossovers between major characters are just cool. If I'd change anything it might be instead of the energy ribbon sending Kirk to the Nexus, it sends him to the future. I always wanted to see him on the Enterprise D, and maybe he could die while assuming command of the ship or sacrificing himself to save Picard and crew.

First Contact - like others, largely leave alone. I'd amp up the action though. It always bothers me during the Deck 16 battle, most of the security guards are just standing there while Worf and Data are the ones shooting.

Insurrection - if Picard's gonna rebel against the Federation, have him rebel against the Federation. You could keep largely the same plot with the Baku, but nix the Sona. Have the Federation being the sole ones after the metaphasic radiation. The whole thing could be a battle for the soul of the Federation and what it means in a time of war. Then again, this might come across as a replay of DS9's Paradise Lost, I suppose. But if anything we'd get a famous Picard speech out of it.

Nemesis - Get a better director? Let Frakes at least do it. Nix the B4 plot and bring back Lore. Maybe Lore creates a Picard clone to mess with Picard and Data. Maybe he wants to pit the Romulans against the Federation for some Machiavellian reason.
 
Last edited:
So let’s say you are the executive in charge of the four TNG movies. How would you make them better? Would you include any story arcs, and if so what? How would you handle the characters? What changes would you make to each film and would you scrap any of them altogether?

I’m curious to hear your thoughts.
I would've never had a crossover and have the characters have an adventure far far away from where they were. A starship discovers the Borg decimating a high tech world; this vessel was only equip to do only scientific studies and not fit for any sort of combat especially the likes of the Borg. As they survey and have guilt as the crew hears the screams from the aliens, the science officer scans to see an spatial distortion is occurring on the planet surface. Is it from the Borg??? What's the source??? The Officer can't verify. The Ex-O wants to investigate, the Captain wants to try to beam as many people as the ship can; She tells her 1st officer to form a landing party and see what's down there. When the Away team arrive they witness the carnage and mayhem from the Borg as the Cube enters through the atmosphere while ripping everything around this lost city. The team discover the distortion is getting larger and it appears the Borg is trying to engage it! They learn the distortion is centered in the planet's core, the Captain has concurred this with the science and Ops officer the source is technological and they've stayed as long as they could they have to bail out. The landing party returns to the ship just to notice they're phasing. Where? Unknown. The ship tries to leaving the system but gets sucked into the core of the planet as the borg cube vaporize.

Picard hears about the situation and journeys the crew to investigate; what the Enterprise discovers will take the crew where no one has gone before.

Sequel: Would be an extension of the 1st movie but will deal with Androids centered around Data. Why have the Federation launched a directive to have an ARMY OF DATAS??? Whatever it is the crew of the Enterprise will find out.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top