OK, sorry for such a corny pun, but, I can seldom pass up the opportunity.
Anyway, I recently saw the new Dune and, inevitably, made a lot of comparisons with the David Lynch version - I say it was inevitable as I've seen the Lynch version I don't even know how many times. In some ways, they're very much alike; in some, not at all. One thing David Lynch definitely got wrong, a problem they avoided here, is he tried to cram the whole book into two-and-a-half hours, and that just wasn't nearly enough. On the other hand, the way they pronounce Harkonnen is this version does not sound at all right to me; I've always pronounced it as in the first movie.
Anyway, I recently saw the new Dune and, inevitably, made a lot of comparisons with the David Lynch version - I say it was inevitable as I've seen the Lynch version I don't even know how many times. In some ways, they're very much alike; in some, not at all. One thing David Lynch definitely got wrong, a problem they avoided here, is he tried to cram the whole book into two-and-a-half hours, and that just wasn't nearly enough. On the other hand, the way they pronounce Harkonnen is this version does not sound at all right to me; I've always pronounced it as in the first movie.