• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Walking Dead: the 11th and final season

Pretty cool that 800k more people watched the finale than the penultimate episode. Means people who dropped the show cared enough to tune in for the ending.
Another important thing to remember is that unlike all other episodes for the past few years, the finale was not made available on AMC+ prior to airing on AMC itself. Therefore it would have gotten more broadcast night viewers by simple virtue of being the first available opportunity for anyone to watch it.

We know the numbers in AMC+ are considered record breaking, and while those exact numbers have never been publicized they must be good enough for AMC to greenlight three spin-offs to replace it. So while I don't doubt the finale had higher viewers overall compared to usual (high profile episodes do draw more viewers out) I suspect if one were to compare it to the numbers the other episodes make, streaming included, there probably isn't that much of a noticeable difference.
 
Which was the mature way of writing her character. Negan finally apologized, but murder--particularly when it happens in front of a loved one--is not easily forgotten or forgiven. This should make their dynamic in the forthcoming series quite interesting. I just do not want to see Negan revert to the arrogance / swagger / threatening behavior toward any of the heroes who might guest star, as it would render his growth in TWD's series finale as pointless and dishonest on his part.
I am hoping they won't either. But i am thinking they will have a scenario where Negan is confronted by a victim of his cruelty who did not have Maggie's opporuntity of seeing how Negan has changed over the years. And she still will be dealing with her mixed feeling, but she had months to do so. That new antagonist will not. SO that seems like a conflict just ripe for showing.

Now, they might show how Negan can still be vicious, but i think it would be more for Annie & the baby, or even protecting Herschel. But it will have Negan being conflicted on it.

I don't think ANnie, the baby or Herschel will be killed, though i wold think that them beign in danger in some way (maybe needing medicine or something), will be the driving force for them to go to New York. And having a common goal would seem logical, as opposed simply exploring.
Not sure if its the same boat.
I am pretty sure it is... the Rick/Michonne scenes felt like a trailer for their series, with a segment to show us how it is related to what we have seen so far.
I'm sure viewers notice the three rings on the back of Rick's jacket. It makes me wonder if Anne/Jadis will return in the Rick & Michonne series.
She absolutely has to be in it... though i would imagine maybe the first episode or 2. They might even show Huck, as she trained Jadis. I don't know if it was the actress or the director, but it seemd like she was trying too hard on Huck, so she might not be that exciting a character to bring back... but would be logical. I forget...did she do something "wrong" that forced her to be assigned to infiltrate the Campus Colony? If so, that might be part of the storyline.... maybe Huck helps Rick in some way?
I've always been under the impression that each spin-off was a limited series, with each show eventually coming together with some linked plot.
The Rick/Michonne series was just suppsoed to be Rick in his own movies... with the first being him being put in his new situation, the last assuming he was supposed to return to TWD, and not sure what the middle would have done. This was announced way before COvid, so not sure if Covid sabotaged that plan.
With Daryl (and Carol,at the time)....not sure if this French plot was always there, or an alternative to run with what World Beyond planted.
And Maggie and Negan -- not sure if there will be any major tie-in. I think the enhanced zombie thing is more to raise the stakes of that show. i doubt we will find out much more than they exist out there.


By the way, i too appreciate your reviews here @TREK_GOD_1 . You gave us a lot of substance to discuss. I was just a tad annoyed, since i didn't have AMC+, so i had to wait on commenting, so that threw me off a lot. ;)

But it has been good to elaborate on things, and see details i missed the first time
Pamela is not a villain like those people. She is more of the type of villain we have in the real world today. That is the point of the final story arc.

White, economically privileged folk whose main goal in life is to maintain their socio-economic status survive the apocalypse and form a community that maintains their status and privilege and (as much as they can) the status quo of what came before. Everyone has the same types of jobs as they had before the apocalypse and although there are really nice things for everyone to do in the community, its purpose is to keep the common people happy so the class structures can be preserved.

The whole Commonwealth story is a commentary on our contemporary society and the "villains" that maintain class structures today. That's why Mercer's final commnent comes across so powerfully.
I definitely see that living on the SOuth Side of Chicago, after growing up in the northwest suburbs of Chicago. The lotting after George Floyd definitely demonstrated the cluelessness of many to inequity, and seeing how many still live that way.

However, i think they showed Pamela's villainy pretty poorly. She seemed to be clueless as to Sebastian's evil doings, for example. A quick rationalizing by Pamela here and there on her politics, but not enough to see her as a villain. Kinda like the "Ming the Administrator" complaint of SyFy's Flash Gordon series vs. the Mingthe Merciless image many of us have. I am not sure how they could have showed it....it wasn't a problem of acting, just writing.

Hornsby was done much better, but then snuffed out (along with his assassin) pretty quickly to tie up his villainy.
I was still hoping that just once we'd see someone bit who died and didn't come back. It'd be good to see that tiny injection of hope for the future.
Yeah.....maybe they will save it for when they finally wrap up the entire universe? ??? Not sure if they will, or it will simply end, like the Berlantiverse.

And one more thing - I think the fact that they made Negan a believably likeable character is an EXTREMELY underrated piece of writing. They portrayed the guy as such a horrible bastard that 5 million viewers tuned out the moment he killed Glenn. And now he is arguably the main protagonist, and it actually doesn't feel forced. Incredible.

I think part of it is the long game of it. For those of us who stuck with the show after killing Glenn (which was hard for me), we had how many years of seeing Negan grow? They also wrote in year sof Judith having a relationship with Negan, so as to help with the humanizing (and making him going after her in the Winter trek very beleivable as well), and having him infiltrate the WHisperers also felt like a natural transition period, where he was "still Negan" but also working "for good." They also had the scene where an ex-savior did horrific things in his name, and was sobered by it.
Jeffrey Dean Morgan did a great job with Negan, so that he felt like the same character all the way through, but with true growth and change

They also had a similar long game with Eugene, where his progression seemed very logical.

Another important thing to remember is that unlike all other episodes for the past few years, the finale was not made available on AMC+ prior to airing on AMC itself. Therefore it would have gotten more broadcast night viewers by simple virtue of being the first available opportunity for anyone to watch it.

We know the numbers in AMC+ are considered record breaking, and while those exact numbers have never been publicized they must be good enough for AMC to greenlight three spin-offs to replace it. So while I don't doubt the finale had higher viewers overall compared to usual (high profile episodes do draw more viewers out) I suspect if one were to compare it to the numbers the other episodes make, streaming included, there probably isn't that much of a noticeable difference.

I think World Beyond would have gotten to that, but it flopped and AMC pretended it was meant to be a limited series.

I agree with @Blake Eddington -- World Beyond, despite how it was spun, i think it was hoped this would be the new show going forward. But it flopped tremendously, despite the new things it opened up, and some connections to other shows.

I think the 3 spinoffs are an attempt to squeeze that very last popularity out for AMC, so they have something to make a profit from. But at this stage, they missed the boat, and will be dying off slowly and quietly, i think. I mean, let's look at it:
1. The biggest is the Rick/Michonne movies. First, Michone wasn't even in the picture at first (these were announced way before her departure). These were also suppsoed to be theaterical movies. But i think it's apparent they wouldn't be able to make these that type of success. so it's been reverted to a limited series (6 episodes easily translating from 3 movies).

The other 2 new shows, which seem to be limited series as well, is partially, in my opinion , due to popular stars who seemto have bad agents, and not getting starring roles else where. Norman Reedus has "Ride with Norman Reedus", and i couple of direct-to-video movies... but anything else? Laurie Cohan's show failed unfortunately at ABC, so she came back to TWD, and Jeffrey Dean Morgan also hasn't gotten a lot of good roles either. So they are available, and all are popular characters... so we can squeeze out a season...but beyond that???

With other spinoffs...as we mentioned, WOrld Beyond fizzled out, Fear seemed to have shot itself in the leg. When Morgan appeared, the series felt like it was gettign a lot bette, with lots more characters to root for. But when they Character Assassinated Strand, it felt like it went down in quality. And Kim DIckens returning -- seems like another publicity stunt. I never felt she was very good in her role, and don't see how it will help the next season. And Tales -- kinda disappointing, despite HUGE potential. We will see if they make more. Seems like cheap one to produce, but i think they lost the TWD hype.

we will see after 2023 if there is really a future for TWD universe.

If AMC wants to keep profiting from TWD, they need to do better merchandising, such as partnering with ALdi's to sell "Carol's Cookies... so good it will make you want to look at the flowers"
 
I was still hoping that just once we'd see someone bit who died and didn't come back. It'd be good to see that tiny injection of hope for the future.

Are we certain the spin-offs or FTWD will not explore that idea? Or at least someone develop a drug which guarantees a person will not reanimate (IOW, suppressing the walker virus)?

I think objectively that a suppression drug would make more sense than hoping for the infection to burn itself out. It seems like there's still too much living human flesh to infect and incubate the virus.

I'm reminded of George A. Romero's original "Day of the Dead" script, where the survivors stand watch over the corpse of one of their friends who hasn't reanimated in a couple of days, and the script doesn't offer any explanation as to why, except one of the characters gets philosophical and says that maybe his was the first descent soul the Lord would let into Heaven after all these years of turmoil.

Personally, I would like to think at some point, a reanimated corpse would become so rotten and decayed as to be non-mobile and the survivors would set up communities away from the big cities and heaviest concentration of bodies, somewhere in the Central Plain state/farm country.
 
Maybe but however secure your community is from external attack all it takes is someone randomly having a brain aneurism or a heart attack in their sleep, or to fall off a ladder and suddenly you have a walker inside your walls and if no one is with them when they die then by the time the alarm's raised you might have 4,5,6,20 walkers to deal with!
 
Maybe but however secure your community is from external attack all it takes is someone randomly having a brain aneurism or a heart attack in their sleep, or to fall off a ladder and suddenly you have a walker inside your walls and if no one is with them when they die then by the time the alarm's raised you might have 4,5,6,20 walkers to deal with!

I would imagine the ZA led to the larger, more organized communities developing strict guidelines for residents based on health they can monitor (as opposed to accidents, natural disaster, etc.,--IOW, not the way Rick's prison was managed)--perhaps creating specialized residential areas for people who are ill / have constant or potentially life-threatening conditions (a kind of assisted living facility). It may not guarantee full control over the threat of reanimated threats within the walls, but it would help in monitoring the most vulnerable part of the population.
 
I would imagine the ZA led to the larger, more organized communities developing strict guidelines for residents based on health they can monitor (as opposed to accidents, natural disaster, etc.,--IOW, not the way Rick's prison was managed)--perhaps creating specialized residential areas for people who are ill / have constant or potentially life-threatening conditions (a kind of assisted living facility). It may not guarantee full control over the threat of reanimated threats within the walls, but it would help in monitoring the most vulnerable part of the population.

In John Russo's original, unproduced "Return of the Living Dead", set 10 years after "Night", that is exactly what has happened. Every time a person dies, they're immediately shot in the head with a bolt gun to prevent reanimation. The only reason there's an outbreak is because of a bus crash and the corpses reanimate and walk out into the woods before the authorities can get to them.
 
^ That would have been interesting as the beginning of a film. I do thoroughly enjoy the released movie, but a different take of a world a decade after NOTLD (not in the way Romero presented in DOTD) was worth producing.
 
On the subject of zombie infection being managed by a society I really should bang my own drum about the novella I had published in 2015, The Lazarus Conundrum, a police procedural set in a Britain where the dead routinely return to life, but where this hasn't led to the collapse of civilisation. Healthcare has never been better funded and everyone wears a tracker that monitors their health, so if they die then ambulances full of gun toting paramedics are on the scene in minutes! The story focuses on a situation where someone is murdered, but they don't come back from the dead.
 
WARNING - the following post contains opinions
The Walking Dead, it was very good early on but....
Things went wrong when many main characters started dying. It's a apocalyptic tale but series are built on characters.
Shane Walsh, Lori Grimes, Merle Dixon, Dale Horwath.... at that point I was getting tired of it but kept watching. The last straw was Andrea.
 
Rosita tells Gabriel with Judith watching them--just a wonderful scene I'm going to ignore that how soon a person becomes a walker all depends on plot.
That scene made me wonder if it wouldn't be possible to survive a walker bite if you're given all the benefits of modern medicine. Remember, the bite doesn't turn you into a walker. It just causes a raging infection and fever that kills you really fast. But with a full round of antibiotics and fever medication, IV drip, blood transfusions, sterile environment ... it seems at least possible to survive.

I mean, clearly that's not the story they wanted to tell with Rosita. But this was the first time they could've done so. Until now, of course the survivors' dirty and unsanitary conditions would lead to infection and death! Before now, we've never seen anyone bitten who could immediately be whisked into a fully-equipped hospital. (Grady Memorial doesn't quite count ... they were clearly suffering from budget cuts.)

It just makes one wonder.
 
That makes a lot of sense in the context of the story. Everyone who dies becomes a zombie--so it is not the bite of a zombie that turns you. I don't think that idea was ever addressed in the comic, let alone the series. In casual conversation, can I use that to make my friends think I'm really smart?
 
My ideas have caused my friends to worship at my feet, so I'd say go for it.

Expecting Mrs. Silvercrest here any time to puncture the ego displayed in the above statement. Fortunately, she doesn't watch the show.
 
Thing is, the Civic Republic is more or less at equal level to modern society, and they undoubtedly have modern medical capabilities. And they still consider being bitten as the mark of death.
 
Thing is, the Civic Republic is more or less at equal level to modern society, and they undoubtedly have modern medical capabilities. And they still consider being bitten as the mark of death.
I am trying to think....what has been the context we have seen? 10 years in, they were still PURPOSELY turning people, either as an experiment or as punishment for that one scientist/spy (or destroying the campus community, which i would imagine still had survivors)

And any others... it was in the middle of a crisis, so they might not have had time/opportunity to save someone...

i guess we will see any development in the new shows
 
That scene made me wonder if it wouldn't be possible to survive a walker bite if you're given all the benefits of modern medicine. Remember, the bite doesn't turn you into a walker. It just causes a raging infection and fever that kills you really fast. But with a full round of antibiotics and fever medication, IV drip, blood transfusions, sterile environment ... it seems at least possible to survive.

I mean, clearly that's not the story they wanted to tell with Rosita. But this was the first time they could've done so. Until now, of course the survivors' dirty and unsanitary conditions would lead to infection and death! Before now, we've never seen anyone bitten who could immediately be whisked into a fully-equipped hospital. (Grady Memorial doesn't quite count ... they were clearly suffering from budget cuts.)

It just makes one wonder.

TWD has been quite clear that a bite's effects cannot be stopped unless the point of infection is amputated; when the bite is in a critical, rather, an area which cannot be removed (see: Jim, T-Dog, Andrea and Rosita's bite wounds), death and reanimation is a guarantee. We can guess that in the early months of the ZA, hospitals, civilian and military medial research facilities all tried everything off of the shelf on victims with wounds such as Rosita's, but there's no evidence that treatment ever worked.
 
They've been quite clear that a bite's effects cannot be stopped with the only resources the characters had before now. With the setting now changing, we can start speculating about new things. (Variant walkers, for example.)

Sure, we can guess that in the early months this was tried and it failed. But there's no evidence either way. Heck, there could be people living normally in some of these other societies for whom it did work. How would we know?

I haven't seen most of the spinoffs yet. If there's evidence for/against treatment of bites, I'll accept it.
 
They've been quite clear that a bite's effects cannot be stopped with the only resources the characters had before now. With the setting now changing, we can start speculating about new things. (Variant walkers, for example.)

Sure, we can guess that in the early months this was tried and it failed. But there's no evidence either way. Heck, there could be people living normally in some of these other societies for whom it did work. How would we know?

I haven't seen most of the spinoffs yet. If there's evidence for/against treatment of bites, I'll accept it.

In FTWD's most recent season, Alicia Clark's forearm had been bitten, but she amputated it in the minutes following the attack. Soon after, she was given IVs of antibiotics, but her fever and overall symptoms were of a relapsing / remitting nature over the course of the season, until she seemed to overcome the effects..but it must be said she was able to amputate the bitten area and not allow the infection to spread as in the case of those bitten in areas that were not able to be amputated (e.g., Rosita, Andrea, et al.).
 
Okay, I'll accept that.

I'm still gonna speculate that if someone was bitten (non-amputate-able) — whether it'd be possible to rush them in, prevent the spread by surgically excising the bitten area, and then going the IV/antibiotic route to keep them alive afterward. But that's only a theoretical exercise ... in most cases (including Rosita's), you still couldn't get them into surgery fast enough for it to work.
 
Regarding medicine though--the zombie infections spread quickly and were immediately deadly. We are talking about an Ebola style infection, not a COVID style infection. We had 2003 or 2010 medical technology which did not have the benefit of a decade's plus worth of research into vaccines following SARS etc. Just because the Walking Dead world was not able to produce modern medicines in time to stop the spread of the infection does not mean it can't be developed given time.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top