Sounds like a topic I might be interested in discussing if there were something I could read. I'm not gonna watch a YouTube video just for the sake of it, though.
I tend to agree, sadly. If it was, say, a paper, I'd be inclined to dig into it when I had some time.
It seems pretty clear that this forum is not the right audience for video essays regarding classic Star Trek.
Kirk was a 60s TV drama heroic stereotype, with a few idiosyncrasies. His "character" was made up as they went along, by the accretion of hundreds of scenes and incidents.
No, I didn't need to watch ten minutes of a monotonous reading delivery contrasting 60s stereotypes of "mature men" with contemporary portrayals in entertainment. The writer is working backward from their biases to cherry pick examples to support their thesis.
I guess it’s understandable that some Trek fans would rather view Kirk as just a stereotypical TV hero of the 60s. Some prefer, even relish in mediocrity. Might as well wear it as a badge of honor. Being an “oldster” is easier than being an “elder;” an oldster is just a youngster who got old, while an elder is someone who grew wiser with age, someone who has something important to say.
“Relish in mediocrity”?
Give me a break.![]()
Oh, that was just a reference to his moniker "Mediocre Old White Man." It would seem fair to say that anyone who wears their mediocrity as a badge must relish in it.
I see…still a little personal, especially what followed.
A lot gets by you, doesn't it?Oh, that was just a reference to his moniker "Mediocre Old White Man." It would seem fair to say that anyone who wears their mediocrity as a badge must relish in it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.