If we want to talk about bridge characters that got no characterization, look no further than to Lt. Ayala. From Chakotay's number one to Voyager's number none.
Because that's all they're supposed to be.They are nothing more than background fixtures.
And?I take your point, maybe we don't need to learn about the bridge, but its unlike any other trek if that is intended.
No.Don't you see it as a disservice to the story however?
Having a perfect leader is boring. People need flaws, they need to make mistakes in order to learn from them.
I think that just because someone's seen the show doesn't mean they're actually watching it. I mean really watching it and actually paying attention to everything. Not just having it on, actively looking for things to find wrong with it, fixating on a couple of pet peeves (real or perceived), and complaining over it while missing what's going on. They're two different things.
That would've given him an echo chamber instead of the type of reactions he wants.Maybe this should have been started in the Enterprise forum.
Where as here it's borderline trollin' IMHO.....That would've given him an echo chamber instead of the type of reactions he wants.
Tell me what Jonathan Archer did before being captain of the Enterprise, other than one test flight. I'll wait.As much flack as Enterprise gets for not using Mayweather or Hoshi, Enterprise did give them dedicated episodes. They were criminally underused, no question but i knew something about them- some attachment was made.
Compare ENT bridge crew and you realize the Discovery bridge might as well not exist. Do we know anything, anything at all about the human males on the bridge? I finally learned Owo and Detmers name in Season 4! it took me 4 damn seasons to learn their names.
Here is a perfect analogy about discovery, it looks pretty, has great special effects, but very little substance. Take the example of Ariam, always loved her look, i wanted to learn more, but they gave us nothing. She was a literal cypher. Then the one episode they show us her backstory they kill her off. This was the only emotional attachment i had to any secondary crew member. and to this day i wish she made the time jump; with newer tech they maybe could have made her more humanlike in appearance.
Frankly its embarrassing that the show only cares about MB. Having a perfect leader is boring. People need flaws, they need to make mistakes in order to learn from them.
Haven't they been doing "Round robin" discussion scenes with the DISCO bridge crew, complete with a dizzying camera shot, latlely?The bridge crew on DIS are all intended to be redshirts that have not had a redshirt death.
I don’t deny that Burnham should be able to talk to her crew every once in a while, beyond giving orders and the bridge crew responding to something on their panels. But that’s not the way the show is written. For better or for worse.
Off the top of my head, he had at one point a really strict hardass CO who told him when dealing with subordinates "they're your crew, not your friends" (Minefield) and he spend some time aboard a Vulcan ship (Breaking the Ice).Tell me what Jonathan Archer did before being captain of the Enterprise, other than one test flight. I'll wait.
I'm not posting in the ENT Forum. I don't believe in shitting on other people's parades. But I'm glad he at least knew how to take a hint.So now that the OP has posted the same post in the ENT forum, are we not supposed to make replies here anymore?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.