• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Enterprise is a better show than Discovery

The bridge crew on DIS are all intended to be redshirts that have not had a redshirt death.

I don’t deny that Burnham should be able to talk to her crew every once in a while, beyond giving orders and the bridge crew responding to something on their panels. But that’s not the way the show is written. For better or for worse.
 
I just re-watched "Stormy Weather" and the focus is pretty well spread out between all the characters. Book has his arc, Zora has her arc, Grey has his arc, Bryce is the Science Guy, everyone brings something to the table on the bridge in general, and we get good insight into Book's past and Saru's point of view. Some great Zora/Grey scenes. Some great Burnham/Zora scenes where a lot of the focus is on Zora. Some great scenes with Book and his father. This other show some people are talking about where it's All Burnham All The Time, it sure wasn't here.

I think that just because someone's seen the show doesn't mean they're actually watching it. I mean really watching it and actually paying attention to everything. Not just having it on, actively looking for things to find wrong with it, fixating on a couple of pet peeves (real or perceived), and complaining over it while missing what's going on. They're two different things.

Here's a tell-tale sign: You respond with specifics and they respond with generalities or double-down on what they said before while deliberately ignoring anything that counters it.
 
Last edited:
Having a perfect leader is boring. People need flaws, they need to make mistakes in order to learn from them.

Oh FFS. If you think Burnham has no flaws then you need to watch again.

You joined the forum just to create a dull shit-stain of a topic like this?

I think that just because someone's seen the show doesn't mean they're actually watching it. I mean really watching it and actually paying attention to everything. Not just having it on, actively looking for things to find wrong with it, fixating on a couple of pet peeves (real or perceived), and complaining over it while missing what's going on. They're two different things.

I could not have said it better. Going through Season 4 right now and the focus throughout has been on Michael, the President, Zora, Book, Tarka, Stamets, Culber, Tilly, all have had their moments so far and while Michael is and always has been the lead character, I don't feel she's overshadowed anybody.

So once again we have a newbie broadcasting ill-informed prejudices as truth. Ah well. I know how it goes by now. Most likely banned in a few weeks and good riddance.
 
Last edited:
Maybe this should have been started in the Enterprise forum.
That would've given him an echo chamber instead of the type of reactions he wants.

If he posted this in the ENT Forum, of course the regulars there would be more likely to say, "I agree! Enterprise is better than Discovery!," with little-to-no pushback.
 
As much flack as Enterprise gets for not using Mayweather or Hoshi, Enterprise did give them dedicated episodes. They were criminally underused, no question but i knew something about them- some attachment was made.

Compare ENT bridge crew and you realize the Discovery bridge might as well not exist. Do we know anything, anything at all about the human males on the bridge? I finally learned Owo and Detmers name in Season 4! it took me 4 damn seasons to learn their names.

Here is a perfect analogy about discovery, it looks pretty, has great special effects, but very little substance. Take the example of Ariam, always loved her look, i wanted to learn more, but they gave us nothing. She was a literal cypher. Then the one episode they show us her backstory they kill her off. This was the only emotional attachment i had to any secondary crew member. and to this day i wish she made the time jump; with newer tech they maybe could have made her more humanlike in appearance.

Frankly its embarrassing that the show only cares about MB. Having a perfect leader is boring. People need flaws, they need to make mistakes in order to learn from them.
Tell me what Jonathan Archer did before being captain of the Enterprise, other than one test flight. I'll wait.

Did he captain any other ships? Serve on any? There is nothing.

Literally, nothing.

Ariam got more development in that one episode than Archer did in 98.
 
No character in DSC has suffered the same neglect Mayweather did. Who is he?

We know similarly little about any of them really. Most of the characters in Enterprise are just a bunch of vague traits with a nationality bolted on for flavour.
 
The bridge crew on DIS are all intended to be redshirts that have not had a redshirt death.

I don’t deny that Burnham should be able to talk to her crew every once in a while, beyond giving orders and the bridge crew responding to something on their panels. But that’s not the way the show is written. For better or for worse.
Haven't they been doing "Round robin" discussion scenes with the DISCO bridge crew, complete with a dizzying camera shot, latlely?
 
So now that the OP has posted the same post in the ENT forum, are we not supposed to make replies here anymore?
 
Tell me what Jonathan Archer did before being captain of the Enterprise, other than one test flight. I'll wait.
Off the top of my head, he had at one point a really strict hardass CO who told him when dealing with subordinates "they're your crew, not your friends" (Minefield) and he spend some time aboard a Vulcan ship (Breaking the Ice).
 
So now that the OP has posted the same post in the ENT forum, are we not supposed to make replies here anymore?
I'm not posting in the ENT Forum. I don't believe in shitting on other people's parades. But I'm glad he at least knew how to take a hint.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top