• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Trek: Starships Model/Magazine Subscription

Yeah, the Voyager prototype was ok, and of course the original Ambassador which was on the conference wall, but those Excelsior concepts were just a waste of money and effort for them.

I was annoyed the Excelsiors turned up in the main series of ships, yet the voyager did not, if I am honest. Same with the shuttles in the UK version.
 
I doubt the performance of Beyond would affect the Starships Collection's output negatively in a major way. We got the USS Franklin and Swam ship models. Enterprises often seemed to sell well - even the non-canon Enterprise-F was released in three variants, and we also received the non-canon ISS Enterprise-D repaint.

Plus, we got models from obscure Star Trek productions whether they were commercially successful or not.
True. I remember the only model kit that inexplicably came out for Nemesis was the Scorpion fighter. No Scimitar, no redesigned E-E. I remember that being quite the noodle-scratcher of a decision back in the day.
 
I think one of AA/DSTs Es was a NEM version

Ben said by the time it was clear there would be no sequel, the digital files had been lost. No company has any CG of that Enterprise-A. That’s why it doesn’t appear in STO or other games, either.
That construction timelapse scene must've used very detailed 3D models... crazy to just delete them :scream:
 
Last edited:
Ben said by the time it was clear there would be no sequel, the digital files had been lost. No company has any CG of that Enterprise-A. That’s why it doesn’t appear in STO or other games, either.

That construction timelapse scene must've used very detailed 3D models... crazy to just delete them :scream:

Well there is Alexander Klemm's (nightfever) almost completely accurate model, they could have used that...
 
Yeah, the Voyager prototype was ok, and of course the original Ambassador which was on the conference wall, but those Excelsior concepts were just a waste of money and effort for them.
Heh, I bought all the Excelsior prototypes, but wasn't interested in the Voyager or Ambassador!
 
Agreed. If an XL Probert Ambassador it had happened, one would hope they'd have fixed the missing window decals on the forward part of the secondary hull. The small model was very well done, but that little omission really kind of stuck out.
 
Going non-canon, as per Star Trek: Trexels the first batch of Ambassador-class ships looked like the concept, including the Enterprise-C.
I’d like to think this is what the C looked like upon launch in 2332. Within the first two years or so, the ships of the class were refitted to series configuration,

Similarly, perhaps there was a Bradbury-class USS Voyager NCC-73606, launched in 2368 and decommissioned in 2370 when the class underperformed. The name Voyager was then assigned to an Intrepid-class ship under construction.
 
I know that that that's the obvious rationale for how the concept Ambassador could be a "real" ship, but given how much sleeker it is, my imagination is that the Probert version is a TNG-era upgrade and the Sternbach version was what was initially built. When the New Frontier novels first came out and described the Excalibur as a refitted Ambassador-class, what I imagined was pretty much the Probert design that was eventually realized.
 
Thanks for sharing that! I see there's a color-blueprint cross section of the Council class that can be requested by email.
 
I finally found some of the "Build the Enterprise D" shuttles on ebay.de. They're pretty huge, and I like the updated paint scheme/weathering on the Type 6.

L0I1A5d.jpg

o3CXz6v.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top