I’m not sure any of us truly understand the economics of the business unless we were in the c suite or their finance departments.
I’m GUESSING that this may have been a highly leveraged merger, meaning they owe mucho dinero to the banks at high interest rates. So lots of financial pressure on the board.
Sunk costs : Looking at their portfolio of movies and where they are in the launch process and a critical eye towards the remaining $ to launch, marketing etc. vs. expected returns, one could easily see where products are abandoned… particularly when a tax write off would exceed the potential profit estimate. Other movies may have a different economic formula due to the factors above. We don’t know, we can only guess.
layoffs: it always seems to be part of any merger. Duplication of depts and Overlapping depts skill sets. The basic idea of a merger is to increase efficiency by reduction of redundancy. This, in real life however, means folks loose jobs which totally sucks.
What all of this boils down to is that mergers generally hurt everyone except the CEOs. This is why America used to have robust anti-trust laws that prevented greedy capitalists from gobbling up too many businesses, reducing competition, and slashing jobs just so they could make more than the insane amount of money they already have. Unfortunately, those laws have been eroded more and more since the Reagan era.
diversity comment: just looking at the composition of a B.O.D. is , in essence, expecting to see certain rations or quotas.
Wrong. Diversity is the natural state of humanity. If you hire fairly and without bias, you automatically get a diverse group, because talented and capable people naturally exist in every gender and ethnic group. The artifical filters are imposed by the people who perpetuate institutionalized white male privilege, who favor those who fit into the traditionally dominant group rather than hiring fairly. Part of the way institutionalized discrimination perpetuates itself is by propagating the lie that uniformity is the automatic default and diversity is the artificial construct. Which carries with it the unspoken bigoted assumption that only white men are capable of succeeding without artificial help because everyone else is inferior.
It's a lot harder to get rid of male privilege than just changing your pronouns, it's sticky stuff.
Good point.