• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So What Are you Reading?: Generations

Summer 2022 Reading Entry #7. Superman: Secret Origin Deluxe Edition (2010) by Geoff Johns, penciled by Gary Frank, and inked by Sibal. Colors by Brad Anderson.

Originally released in single comic book issues as Superman: Secret Origin #1-6 (November 2009-October 2010). Version read: First hardcover reprint collection (the "Deluxe Edition", copyright date 2010; 2019 printing). Has also been released in trade paperback format in 2011 and 2018.

Okay, now that that's all of that now out of the way. I *loved* this book (comic book mini-series)! Superman: Secret Origin was the *third* time that DC Comics decided to do a major revamping of Superman's origin story in what most would consider to be the modern era of comics. The first had been John Byrne's The Man of Steel six-issue mini-series (1986). The second (which I just read and reviewed a few weeks ago) was Mark Waid, Leinil Francis Yu, and Gerry Alanguilan's twelve-issue Superman: Birthright series (2003-2004).

I started reading comics not less than ten years prior to Byrne's Man of Steel, so I was very familiar with both his version of the character and his origin story as well as the classic version that had been built up over the many decades prior to that (the "Pre-Crisis" version, as in pre Crisis on Infinite Earths, which was the first time DC did an intentional massive revamping of their line).

I really liked Byrne's version. When Waid, Yu, and Alanguilan's Birthright came along in 2003, I was resistant to it because I didn't see a reason to change Superman's origin story at that time from Byrne's version. I was also, at that time, starting to fall way behind in my comics reading, so I only partly got through Birthright when it first came out.

By the time I got around to reading Birthright now, I'm much more used to seeing multiple versions of Superman's origin story, both in the comics and also in the Superman television shows and movies. So I was more open to it now than I had been in 2003. (Plus, I knew now that Birthright was no longer the current "canon" version of Superman's origins in the comics than Byrne's, having been surpassed by several other company wide crossover "events" and origin retellings/reimaginings.)

Enter Superman: Secret Origin, which came out just five years after Birthright had finished. Now, I can't recall exactly what all was going on in the main Superman comics at the time or the rest of DC's superhero titles because by that point I had stopped regularly buying comics or was just about to. I do know, however, that British comic book artist Gary Frank had been the doing the art on Superman's stories in Action Comics already at the time that Secret Origin came out. My first encounters with Frank's art had been on titles like J. Michael Straczynski's Midnight Nation (Top Cow Comics) and Supreme Power (Marvel), and on Peter David's runs on Incredible Hulk (Marvel) and Supergirl (DC). Gary Frank has a nice clean classic looking art style and excels especially in the very clear and varied facial expressions he is able to give all of his characters.

However, let me get right to exactly why I love Superman: Secret Origin so much (and really any time Gary Frank draws Superman): Frank's Superman is clearly 100% unapologetically Christopher Reeve, straight out of the 1978-1980s Superman movies. Which is wonderful for me and probably most others who are just the right age that Reeve *was* their live action version of Superman growing up.

Yes, it's a line drawing of Superman still, and Frank does put in a little bit of his own "tweaking" of Superman (and Clark Kent's) face, but I would be lying if I said it wasn't clearly Reeve that's Frank's visual inspiration. And it goes beyond just the face. Frank also draws Superman in flight and in walking, etc., in clearly Christopher Reeve inspired Superman movie poses. And his Clark Kent in the classic blue suit and really big round lens glasses, again, pure Christopher Reeve.

Beyond hitting my nostalgic buttons there, however, writer Geoff Johns also wisely hits a completely different set of nostalgic buttons for older readers by bringing back elements from the pre John Byrne Man of Steel/pre-Crisis version of Superman's origin and back story. Specifically, he brings back the notion that Clark's adopted mother, Martha, created the Superman costume for him out of materials found in the spaceship that brought him to Earth back while Clark was still a school boy instead of much later on after Clark had grown to adulthood. In short, Johns brings back "Superboy".

Now, we don't get the impression that Clark did much superheroing in public during those years because he still comes as a complete surprise to everyone when he makes his public debut in Metropolis as Superman many years later. And young Clark is actually embarrassed to wear the costume. However, where it he does when secretly rescuing people from various accidents.

And, soon after he does start wearing his new costume, along come three similarly strange costumed teenagers with super-power saying they are from the future and part of an organization of super-teens there called the Legion of Super-Heroes. They say Clark is their inspiration in their era and they broke several rules to travel back in time to meet him. Clark convinces them to take him with them back to their 30th Century future where he is not only amazed by everything but also for the first time in his life gets to enjoy being with others like him.

It's a short visit and they bring him back but it is nice in that it reintroduces to the DC continuity that Clark had been a part of the Legion of Super-Heroes in his early years as Superboy. (Byrne had dropped the Superboy element of Superman's past entirely in his version.)

That's all in the first two issues. The remaining four issues deal with Clark in Metropolis. The usual stuff. Meeting Lois Lane, Perry White, Jimmy Olsen. Getting his job at the Daily Planet. Making his debut as Superman. Saving people but also being feared by some at the same time for being different. Lex Luthor is the main villain again, of course, just as he had been in Man of Steel and Birthright. As in Birthright, this version of the story has Lex moving briefly to Smallville as a boy and meeting Clark before moving on. It also, as in Birthright has Lex discover the chunk of Kryptonite in Smallville that he later uses as a power source for things he has planned (and, as a bonus, realizes that the glowing green radioactive meteorite is the one thing that can hurt Superman). As in Birthright, Lex turns the people against Superman briefly, revealing that Superman is in actuality an alien and therefore must be dangerous.

You also get two other classic comics Superman villains, the Parasite and Metallo, both created either intentionally (Metallo) or unintentionally (the Parasite) by Luthor's experiments with the Kryptonite. (I have to say that it is very cool to see a Christopher Reeve looking Superman fighting these long time comics bad guys, Metallo and the Parasite, villains we never got to see in the 1980s movies.)

And, really, that's overall exactly what Superman: Secret Origin does and therefore makes it such an enjoyable comic/graphic novel: it's "fan service" in the best meaning of the term. It mixes elements from more than one much loved previous version of Superman (the Christopher Reeve movies, the pre-Crisis comics, and more recent retellings of the origin story) to present a thoroughly enjoyable hybrid of them all. I highly recommend Superman: Secret Origin, especially to those in their forties or older who grew with Christopher Reeve as *their* Superman (although I think readers younger than that who didn't have that experience with the Reeve movies will also find it to be enjoyable). I gave it a five out of five stars on GoodReads.

(Previous Summer 2022 Reading Entries: #1: Star Trek: Avenger by William Shatner (1997; novel); #2: Batman vs. Ra's Al Ghul by Neal Adams (2019-2021, six-issue comic book limited-series; 2021 collected hardcover edition); #3: Superman: Birthright by Mark Waid, Leinil Francis Wu, and Gerry Alanguilan (twelve-issue comic book limited series; 2003 to 2004; read on DC Universe Infinite, also available in hardcover and softcover editions); #4: Star Trek: The Next Generation: Slings and Arrows Book 1: A Sea of Troubles by J. Steven York and Christina F. York (2007; novella), #5: The Orville Season 1.5: New Beginnings by David A. Goodman and David Cabeza (2019, four issue comic book limited series; 2020 collected trade paperback edition), #6: Star Trek: The Next Generation: Slings and Arrows, Book 2: The Oppressor's Wrong by Phaedra Weldon.)

—David Young
 
Just finished Slings and Arrows, Book 4: That Sleep of Death (and created a review thread for it). I’ve started on ST: TNG: Section 31: Rogue next because it takes place between Slings and Arrows books four and five/six. I also still am in the midst of volume one of The Story of Marvel Studios: The Making of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which I put aside for a bit to concentrate on the Slings and Arrows books and comics.

—David Young
 
I finished reading Magic Breaks by Ilona Andrews, the 7th book in their (Andrews is actually a pseudonym used by a husband and wife) Kate Daniels series. Love this series, and this was great entry in it, that took some huge steps forward in the series arc. There are only 3 or 4 books left in the series, and I'm very curious to see where it goes next.
 
COMEUPPANCE SERVED COLD by Marion Deeds.

A hard-boiled historical fantasy set in 1920s Seattle? How can I resist?
 
A hard-boiled historical fantasy set in 1920s Seattle? How can I resist?
For some reason, any time I encounter the phrase, "hard-boiled" in reference to a work of fiction (as opposed to an egg), I immediately think of Hard-Boiled Defective Stories, by Charles Burns. And that's not a typo; the book is a collection of hard-boiled pulp fiction that openly purports to be all . . . somehow . . . defective. Never actually bought a copy, but I thumbed through it in Waldenbooks, back when it was in print.
 
Currently, The Ten Thousand - Harold Coyle. I've read a couple of his but not got this far in the series before.
 
BLAMELESS by Gail Carriger

The third in the Parasol Protectorate series (and the one in which the regular characters get that group appellation. As with the previous ones, an amusing and exciting tale of vampires, werewolves, and assorted others (Knights Templar in this case) in a steampunk Victorian London.

Following on from the end of the previous book, Alexia is on her own, with pretty much everyobody trying to kill her or experiment upon her because she’s expecting. A chase across Europe ensures, with some obvious and inevitable changes of heart among the characters, and some surprise developments too.

As with the series as a whole, good light-hearted adventure fun.
 
I just re-read Tales from the Captain's Table.
Most of them, I'd completely forgotten. I remembered the general gist of the Demora Sulu story by the time I was a few pages into it. Very sad, but thankfully lacking the utter hopelessness of Last Best Hope. I'd completely forgotten that the Jonathan Archer story was a screwball slapstick farce. I remembered that the David Gold story was framed by his Yom Kippur observance before I'd even cracked the book this time, but I'd completely forgotten the story itself.

Hmm. I wonder: The Captain's Table being interdimensional in nature, does it extend across different realities? e.g., Prime and Abramsverse, or Prime and First Splinter?
 
Hmm. I wonder: The Captain's Table being interdimensional in nature, does it extend across different realities? e.g., Prime and Abramsverse, or Prime and First Splinter?

It probably would allow access to alternate timelines. A lot of the "crosstime saloons" in fiction do so.

One of the Captain's Table novels (I think it was Where Sea Meets Sky) posited that it even extended across fictional realities, with Captain Nemo (the Disney version rather than the Verne version) being one of the patrons. But I felt that was stretching the concept too far past what's credible in the Trek universe.
 
I read the Star Trek: Dark Passions duology for the first time. It was better than I expected, and I had fun with it in some parts. I feel like possession of the Iconian device would be more of a game changer than it ended up being. Wright could have had Seven use it to go with Janeway's group to a time and place of her choosing instead of leaving it as a loose end.
 
I am reading Star trek Terok Nor: Day of the Vipers. I am halfway through the book but I have trouble getting into the story, I don't like it much. Only character I find intresting is Dukat
 
Last edited:
I read the Star Trek: Dark Passions duology for the first time. It was better than I expected, and I had fun with it in some parts. I feel like possession of the Iconian device would be more of a game changer than it ended up being. Wright could have had Seven use it to go with Janeway's group to a time and place of her choosing instead of leaving it as a loose end.
If I remember correctly, Dark Passions came out a few months before the Gateways series, which was itself based around Iconian tech, and I thought, given the timing of the releases, that there would be some sort of tie-in between the two projects. There wasn't, and that seemed like a missed opportunity to me.
 
If I remember correctly, Dark Passions came out a few months before the Gateways series, which was itself based around Iconian tech, and I thought, given the timing of the releases, that there would be some sort of tie-in between the two projects. There wasn't, and that seemed like a missed opportunity to me.
Dark Passions was January 2001, and Gateways started in July. The dates and universe for each were not the same, so any connection would have been difficult to pull off and still have it feel natural.
 
It's more than a little off-topic for this thread, but:
I have this vague recollection of books (not any TrekLit that I can think of, at least off the top of my head) in which people who seek to oppress others (and falsely claim to be the oppressed ones themselves) wind up becoming the targets of oppression. Of course, the "Inferno" section of Dante's Divine Comedy is overflowing with cases of the damned getting it in the end, often hilariously (e.g., flatterers being immersed chin-deep in shit), and of course we also have the section of Pinocchio (I'm afraid I'm only familiar with Disney's version) where boys who make asses of themselves figuratively on Pleasure Island discover that they'd also done so literally. In particular I vaguely recall some book, short story, fable, fairy tale, or maybe a losing endgame scenario in an old Infocom game, in which somebody ends up with a bit being forced into his mouth.

Any of this ring any bells with anybody?

Going back on-topic, this morning, I re-read "First, Do No Harm" in Constellations. Which ties in rather well with one or more recent Prime Directive threads, in that it's about a case of Starfleet Command applying the letter of the PD in direct contradiction to its spirit (as is so common in the TNG era), only doing so in the TOS era.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top