• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers 'Obi-Wan Kenobi' series [Spoiler Discussion]

It is my opinion that I would have liked to see more Hayden throughout the series. Don’t need to have the joy sucked out of said opinion. Obviously it’s not a choice those behind the show decided to make. But thanks, he says sarcastically.

Sorry you interpreted my neutral comment in an aggressive way.

He said neutrally.
 
I don't think this is a recent thing. I think this is the Prequel Trilogy and the Clone Wars too. It was done in smaller ways but a lot more than people realize. What has become more apparent is the simple fact that fans are becoming more insistent that fan service and rule of cool is more preferable.

I don't think that's a fair characterization of the PT at all. While there occasionally ideas that seem unnecessary, like making C3P0 built by Anakin, the entire trilogy as a whole is quite different from the OT and definitely stakes its own territory (for better and for worse.)

George clearly had a story he wanted to tell. You can debate whether or not it was "necessary" or even a good idea to tell Darth Vader's backstory.

But I can't agree with the assessment that it was "fan service", certainly not in the way later properties like "Force Awakens" shamelessly are, which is chock-a-block with recycling of concepts, references and callbacks.
 
I kind of wish this whole project had been done as a feature film. With a feature film budget. There are some scenes that just look and feel a little too much like TV to me. But, seeing as how the whole "A Star Wars Story" thing fizzled out, and the focus for new on-screen Star Wars stuff is streaming TV, I guess the movie route wasn't a viable option.

This episode had some good stuff: Making Reva's backstory and motives clearer. The juxtaposition of younger Ani and Obi's practice duel with their cat-and-mouse in the present day (I do wish they had made more effort to make Hayden Christensen look younger), cool lightsaber stuff at the end.

Kor
 
But I can't agree with the assessment that it was "fan service", certainly not in the way later properties like "Force Awakens" shamelessly are, which is chock-a-block with recycling of concepts, references and callbacks.
It wasn't all fan service but it was built with that attitude in mind. To me, the PT is the height of unnecessary in terms of Star Wars stortyelling. It adds little, and takes away much from the OT. It connects characters who genuinely do not have any reason to have that connection, i.e. R2-D2 and Padme, 3PO as you note, Yoda and Chewbacca, off the top of my head.

Now, to the PT's credit, and a place that it does better than the ST, is that it expands a little bit of the world of Star Wars, and utilizing some different locations to decent effect.

I'm also not saying it is exactly the same style of fan service as current outputs. I'm saying the seeds were put out there by the PT with the small universe connections, and with how it framed different parts of the story. The Clone Wars went further, and ST still further and now we arrive at fans wanting the smaller universe over a good story.
 
I kind of wish this whole project had been done as a feature film. With a feature film budget. There are some scenes that just look and feel a little too much like TV to me. But, seeing as how the whole "A Star Wars Story" thing fizzled out, and the focus for new on-screen Star Wars stuff is streaming TV, I guess the movie route wasn't a viable option.

This episode had some good stuff: Making Reva's backstory and motives clearer. The juxtaposition of younger Ani and Obi's practice duel with their cat-and-mouse in the present day (I do wish they had made more effort to make Hayden Christensen look younger), cool lightsaber stuff at the end.

Kor

I have to agree. None of the location shots have felt cinematic to me. At least, not cinematic in the Star Wars sense of the word. Everything was obviously shot with a hundred or so miles of Los Angeles, which makes it feel not unlike many other shows of multiple genres out there.
 
But, seeing as how the whole "A Star Wars Story" thing fizzled out, and the focus for new on-screen Star Wars stuff is streaming TV, I guess the movie route wasn't a viable option.
Of course it is viable but this way they control the finance stream. And given the near constant news articles I see around Kenobi and Disney currently it's clearly working exactly how they want it.
 
It wasn't all fan service but it was built with that attitude in mind. To me, the PT is the height of unnecessary in terms of Star Wars stortyelling. It adds little, and takes away much from the OT. It connects characters who genuinely do not have any reason to have that connection, i.e. R2-D2 and Padme, 3PO as you note, Yoda and Chewbacca, off the top of my head.

It made the SW seem small when too many main characters all had some pre-OT connection. It was fine for Bail to know Obi-Wan and Yoda (considering the role they take on at the end of ROTS), but the connections you mention were ridiculous and did not serve the story at all.

One of the worst PT mistakes was the creation of Midichlorians when SW never need some grade-school "biological" reason for connection to/use of the Force, which the OT developed in a very different, intentionally spiritual way. That, and for all of the attention Midichlorians was paid in TPM, its never mentioned again in the PT, and obviously never in its "future"--the OT.

Then again, I recall fans also arguing how unnecessary Rogue One was since the heart of the film was covered in the opening crawl of Star Wars, and in the decades after that film, no one needed any connections made / characters explored who were faceless--as they needed to be.

That said, I would be shocked if Disney creates a series or movies about the equally faceless Bothan spies (who Palpatine allowed to learn the location of the 2nd Death Star) because...why not? Its continuing the tradition of scraping the bottom of the fan-service/nostalgia barrel to make something out of what was once minor and/or insignificant.
 
Last edited:
That said, I would be shocked if Disney creates a series or movies about the equally faceless the Bothan spies (who Palpatine allowed to learn the location of the 2nd Death Star) because...why not? Its continuing the tradition of scraping the bottom of the fan-service/nostalgia barrel to make something out of what was once minor and/or insignificant.
I don't see the harm in doing so. If fans truly detest it that much then it would be advisable to not engage fully with the material.

Personally, what Star Wars has always been about is looking at the big evil organization vs. the much smaller people, meaning that a story about the Bothan spies going against the Empire is right in tone and spirit with the original Star Wars as a veiled Vietnam analogy.
That, and for all of the attention Midichlorians was paid in TPM, its never mentioned again in the PT, and obviously never in its "future"--the OT.
Save for Palaptine's talks with Anakin in ROTS.
 
Save for Palaptine's talks with Anakin in ROTS.

Ah, that's right, but even with that reference, for something draped in importance from its treatment in TPM, for no Jedi to ever mention it again made the idea seem like a fly-by-night / take-it-or-leave it item, especially since Lucas did not go back as shove it into the OT.
 
Ah, that's right, but even with that reference, for something draped in importance from its treatment in TPM, for no Jedi to ever mention it again made the idea seem like a fly-by-night / take-it-or-leave it item, especially since Lucas did not go back as shove it into the OT.
Lucas was wounded quite deeply by the reaction to TPM and he took that quite to heart it seems, with the downgrading of Jar-Jar Binks in AOTC, and the near removal of the midiclorians aside from brief mentions. I'm not surprised he avoided it because the backlash was quite fierce and didn't work the way he hoped it would.
 
That's the problem--Disney/Star Wars is not telling compelling stories because they--like the majority of the writers behind 30+ years of ancillary market creations (comics, novels, etc.) long before the Disney acquisition are not only incapable of doing so, but their greed prevents them from realizing that as a concept, Star Wars had a finite life / story--it was never about thousands of years' worth of characters and events. Few can say that Disney/Star Wars is telling stories that have any creatively valid reason for existing, other than focusing on things that are more fan service / nostalgia (and other motives) than substance.

McGregor is a strong actor, and deliver a fine performance as Obi-Wan in the PT (by far, the best thing about the PT which has aged well), but in what was sold as a showcase for the character has made him largely a supporting character of his own narrative, allegedly "rising" to some occasion in the 6th and final episode. So far, its not coming off as a SW story anyone was asking for.
I’m liking it.:shrug:

Also, I don’t agree about your assessment of Star Wars: by now is a universe and you can set any kind of story in it. Just like the mandalorian has done, bringing on screen western stories. Could they have been done in another setting with just a minor rewrite? Sure, but we like to build and expand imaginary universes, it’s fun and a way to forget ours for a few hours.
 
I always find escapism entertainment fascinating. Like, I enjoy participating in the world but I don't forget my world because of it. If anything, it makes me more reflective on problems, drawing upon inspiration of the strength of the protagonists, and finding some measure of similitude in personal struggle to aid in my efforts.

Now, video games, that's full escapism. Same with novels. TV shows and films are less so.

It's a weird relationship I have with escapist entertainment. I don't like as much as when I was younger.
 
One of the worst PT mistakes was the creation of Midichlorians when SW never need some grade-school "biological" reason for connection to/use of the Force, which the OT developed in a very different, intentionally spiritual way.

It's not particularly spiritual when Force potential can be passed down automatically in a genetic family bloodline as ROTJ made explicit. Force use has always had some kind of biological connection, going back to Lucas' early notes in the 1970s. ( It's implicit in TESB, which goes out of its way to emphasize Luke's importance. Why this kid, as opposed to any other disgruntled young person mad at the Empire? ) It only makes sense that there would have to be some kind of biological connection as limiting factor, because you need some way to explain why the bulk of the galactic population isn't out there running around doing the space wizard thing. Are trillions of sapient beings simply not spiritual enough?
 
I never understood midichlorians as a conduit to the force, or the actual consciousness behind the force.
More like a correlated phenomenon.
A single celled organism that is sensitive to the force just like other beings, but they coalesce where the force is strongest, so happen to live inside Jedi in large quantities. Like moths toward light.
 
If anything, it makes me more reflective on problems, drawing upon inspiration of the strength of the protagonists, and finding some measure of similitude in personal struggle to aid in my efforts.
for me that’s the aftermath, mostly.

Now, video games, that's full escapism. Same with novels. TV shows and films are less so.
no difference for me, a good concept is a good concept no matter the medium.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top