I'll admit that my old brain doesn't quite yet grasp the endgame of the project, but I do know it's quite exciting!
If you're like me, you only vaguely remember that there was recently an unveiling of a fully explorable refit Enterprise. Turns out they've been up to a lot more than that!
Also about miniskirts: Raised by a feminist mom, I saw them only as the product of male culture to make women into eye candy, not full thinking, capable human beings.
Yet Ms. Nichols and Whitney referred to them as empowering.
That’s a spot on Colt lookalike there.
They mean Oculus or whatever they're using at conventions. If anyone has visited the Roddenberry Vault on Sansar or the ostensibly deleted Stage 9 Ent-D recreation or any of the Steam VR environments of the Enterprise, they know how AMAZING it is. Keeping it convention-only is such a waste.I’m not quite clear what this project actually is. A “holographic recreation” of The Cage? (What does that mean, exactly? Freestanding 3D holography you can walk around in like in the movies still doesn’t exist.). A 1:1 recreation of the Enterprise? (Again, what do they mean? Something for Oculus?)
I’m not quite clear what this project actually is. A “holographic recreation” of The Cage? (What does that mean, exactly? Freestanding 3D holography you can walk around in like in the movies still doesn’t exist.). A 1:1 recreation of the Enterprise? (Again, what do they mean? Something for Oculus?)
The project has been in the works since 2018, but it's not open to the public yet. It's going to be part of the Roddenberry Archive, wherever that may end up being constructed. The endgame is actually getting away from home VR platforms and headsets or goggles such as Oculus and instead having an immersive installation experience done with life-size holographic projections to really give you the impression that you are in the ship. To make this happen they are working with a holographic display company called Light Field Lab. This is being touted as "one of the world’s first fully immersive holographic installation experiences."Where is this "fully explorable refit Enterprise?"
...
My thinking, and I could certainly be wrong, is that for millennia, men, as a way of keeping women down, have demonized female sexuality so that wearing a miniskirt is a way for women to say "yes, I am a sexual being and there's nothing wrong with it."I too am unclear on the concept.
Also about miniskirts: Raised by a feminist mom, I saw them only as the product of male culture to make women into eye candy, not full thinking, capable human beings.
Yet Ms. Nichols and Witney referred to them as empowering.
And yes, women's "charms" have power over men.
But I'm still left wondering -- so many people are sexist to begin with, do revealing clothes not in the long run reinforce (many, not all) men's underlying attitude of women as things to be seen/had, and not full people?
Just thinking out loud here.
Grace and peace to you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.