Picking up steam again, me likey. A lot of questions were answered, and we've been left with truly interesting ones to keep the cogs in our brains turning for the next two weeks. We learned Q's doing what he's doing because he's dying. It makes me wonder whether the penance he talked about is Picard's or his own. But we still don't quite understand what exactly he's doing. Does he change the timeline because he wants Picard to figure out how to save it? The key words are humans being stuck in the past, and that the trap is immaterial and it's the escape that counts... is the way the timeline is being interfered with as Picard's working to save it Q's very own, dynamically evolving version of an escape room for him?
Also, how much of an outside interference is the Borg Queen now? Is she an unpredictable new variable in this, or is her interference the actual point of this whole exercise, eventually circling all back to what happened back on the Stargazer? Are Q's words about "a timeline of their own making" about Picard's bringing the Borg Queen back to the 21st century being the catalyst for changing the timeline?
And what is Kore's role in all of this? Did Q cure her to put Soong in a devastated and desperate mood enough that he'd readily accept the Queen's deal with the devil? Or maybe Kore herself is the key? Without her being cured, Soong would be able to keep the truth about his experiments hidden from the world (the board that denied him funding - to me, at least - seemed to be under the impression that he was using illegal research to cure a naturally born, only daughter), but if Kore went public about what he really did, it might just discredit him forever and they wouldn't reach out to him even if Renée's mission failed... AAAAH, like I said, too many possible outcomes, I can't wait to find out.
There's one piece of info that worries me though, about the extremophile lifeform Renée is supposed to find on Io somehow rendering Soong's work obsolete. What does this mean? I really, REALLY hope it won't end up as a microbe that eats greenhouse gases, because it would send the worst possible message regarding global warming, and play right into the hands of the enterpreneurs currently trying to monetize carbon scrubbing technology as a be-all and end-all to fix climate change without actually having to do anything about it. Still, for now, we're missing a piece of the puzzle we're probably getting soon.
Yeah, what else? Things that everybody else said, I guess: Pill, de Lancie and Spiner carried the episode on their backs with their stellar villainous and/or anti-villainous performances (like they've always done in the season), Raffi and Seven's fighting was heart-wrenching to watch with both their emotional wounds being laid bare, and Rios just keeps digging himself deeper and deeper.
Speaking of Rios, I keep scratching my head at the relatively common opinion on the internet, that his stupid decision to involve Teresa and Ricardo in all of this is stupid writing because it endangers the integrity of the timeline. But why does a character making stupid choices automatically mean that the writers are stupid? It reminds me of that exchange on tumblr on the nature of plot holes that basically boiled down to "a plot hole is when a character doesn't do what I thought they were going to do or what I thought they should've done." Why does this character make an emotional judgment consistent with their personality and morality as opposed to doing the most rationally obvious logical choice appropriate to the situation? STUPID WRITERS!