Izzard and Siddig would have been fine twenty years ago. Hell, even a decade ago. I can't see RTD or the BBC wanting an actor around 60, the Hugh Grant rumor notwithstanding. Not with the franchise in the state it's in. Early 30s I think is what we're looking at.
Yeahhhh...I've been rooting for those for so long that it's hard to stop, even though I know you're completely right.
She's also wonderful in The Darjeeling Limited and The Night of.
Vicious also showed his comedic chops, holding his own against the likes of Ian McKellen and Derek Jacobi!
Ha, Bishopbriggs times.......... i was up in that area a few months ago dropping off a van load of fly tipped old fridges at the local refuse center, but never saw the tardis anywhere though. lolCourtesy of Big Finish's Kenny Smith here's the full newspaper story that photo of Capaldi and Pertwee came from.
17! God, he was adorkable!
Courtesy of Big Finish's Kenny Smith here's the full newspaper story that photo of Capaldi and Pertwee came from.
Imagine Time After Time-era McDowell as The Doctor…I found a list of suggestions I made in the summer of 2002, and my top two choices were Malcolm McDowell and Stephen Fry. Either would have worked at the time, I'd have loved to see either as the Doctor, and I will forever wonder what might have been.
Up and down the country, youngsters who've had their picture taken with Peter Capaldi have an additional reason to keep the photo. When one of them becomes the Doctor twenty/thirty years from now people can be bowled over by the image of (then) present and future Doctors together.
To be fair, that is BBC's official website. They ought to know many will rightfully think seeing "the next Doctor is expected to be announced in coming weeks" and think it means the announcement is imminent. If that's not the case, they really should have left it vague with "the next Doctor will be announced at some future date" or not even mention the new Doctor at all.
