• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

I never had any problem with the concept of polarising the hull plating to make it stronger, but I did think that introducing a technology that's functionally identical to shields in all but one way (blocking transporter beams) was a bad move for a series that was supposed to feel different from Voyager.
The only real difference was the wording in the script.
 
Okay, I like this deleted scene. It's awkward and ridiculous as Hell but it makes me smile.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Ha ha. Don't think I've seen that before. Thanks.

Shatner's movie is unfairly maligned.
 
I think "Lower Decks" would suit our salamanders better.
Well, now, I love Lower Decks. I love it. But, that's not the place for doubling down on the salamanders, in my view.

Caption at the end of TMP says "The human adventure is just beginning" and they're a hyper-evolved set o' humans. In DISCO they've had a millennium to breed, grow and potentially encounter other life. Perhaps help improve their technology. Perhaps build their own. And then travel the 70 odd years to their point of origin.

I mean, it's never, ever going to happen. If only because, to properly double down on it, they'd have to be salamanders, not bipeds with funny foreheads (which would be a de-evolution, right?). Which means puppets or really good, budget killing CGI.

But, they're the next step in evolution and the CSA should have been after Janeway and Paris about them.

I'm also thinking in the sense of Space Seed, "It will be interesting to see what grows from the seed we planted here."
 
Some people argue that over time Captain Kirk, played by William Shatner, eventually became more like Captain Shatner.

Between his Twitter and all the behind-the-scenes stories that have cropped up, I disagree. Shatner played Kirk as Kirk all the way up to Generations. The character may have gradually changed but it's all still Kirk.

If he played Captain Shatner in the later movies, then it would've been completely different. The level of assholery displayed by Kirk would go straight through the roof.
 
Some people argue that over time Captain Kirk, played by William Shatner, eventually became more like Captain Shatner.

Shantner himself stated that they didn't give him a lot to base the character on, so he played it close to the chest. Ergo it was always Captain Shantner.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top