yes. Seven without Borg bits is rather iron clad evidence in this regard.
If the Borg Queen manages to outmeme like a bantha we‘ll live in a better world.Saw this on Facebook and it made me laugh:
![]()
This probably makes me a horrible person but Rios' beam in was the most I've laughed at TV in a long time.
Well, the make up is good but that is horrifying.Saw this on Facebook and it made me laugh:
![]()
Well, the make up is good but that is horrifying.
Definitely.
And it looks like the meme was created from an outtake where Annie Wershing was goofing off a bit between scenes.
https://twitter.com/Wersching/status/1504992758246756355
And it looks like the meme was created from an outtake where Annie Wershing was goofing off a bit between scenes.
That's nice for Raffi.If Raffi is also in this world's counterpart body instead of her own, then it's possible that she's no longer addicted to Snakebite.
Although, there's a mental aspect to addiction, so that really just means that her new body has none of the old tolerances of her old body, and if she tries to get high again, it will be just like the first time again.
That's a newfangled makeup technique where they color grade the complexion in post. It creates a more natural effect than caking on makeup to achieve pallor, which can become pretty noticeable at high resolutions. They did the same thing with Palpatine in The Rise of Skywalker.Am I the only one who is surprised at how healthy/even the Borg Queen's skin tone is under normal light?
Yeah, I remember the Borg Queen in First Contact wasn't that ash white that Borg were in TNG, but still.
Huh? It's 'Our Future'? I must have missed the Eugenics Wars of the 1990ies ("...whole populations BOMBED out of existence...", etc.) Star Trek diverged from being 'our' future quite early in its run.Which really would be a shame, since a big part of Star Trek's appeal is that it's OUR future, and it's a positive one.
So far, whenever they got an imediate prediction wrong (Eugenic Wars in 1996) - they opted to retcon stuff to line up with our reality again, over making the whole thing an alternate universe.
The original conceit was it was our Future, just as most TV shows are set in our "present". I'm sure Gene and company had no intention of some sort of alternate reality. Tossing in dates close to the time of production was a misstep. But, WWII was just two decades past and WWI was a couple decades prior to that. I can forgive them for thinking the next global conflict would be in 30 years time. (And thank God, it wasn't). They were also a little off on the pace of the space race, but those were heady times.Huh? It's 'Our Future'? I must have missed the Eugenics Wars of the 1990ies ("...whole populations BOMBED out of existence...", etc.) Star Trek diverged from being 'our' future quite early in its run.
Also because the music cut out in the middle of the song like that XDThis probably makes me a horrible person but Rios' beam in was the most I've laughed at TV in a long time.
That's nice for Raffi.
But, how does Elnor being in his doppelganger's body change that body's Vulcanoid physiology? Neither he or his doppelganger are addicts. Neither he or his doppelganger have Borg implants. Neither he or his doppelganger are synths. Same for Rios and Jurati. From what has been presented they and their doppelgangers are 100 human.
I've always been if favor of ditching dates and concepts that no longer work. Unfortunately fans and even some pros just can't let go of any date point. The holy writ cannot be changed.
Uh huh - right? It's 'writer's that can't let go...'The original conceit was it was our Future, just as most TV shows are set in our "present". I'm sure Gene and company had no intention of some sort of alternate reality. Tossing in dates close to the time of production was a misstep. But, WWII was just two decades past and WWI was a couple decades prior to that. I can forgive them for thinking the next global conflict would be in 30 years time. (And thank God, it wasn't). They were also a little off on the pace of the space race, but those were heady times.
I've always been if favor of ditching dates and concepts that no longer work. Unfortunately fans and even some pros just can't let go of any date point. The holy writ cannot be changed.
Sorry, but given anytime something doesn't jibe with how a 'fan' remembers or thinks something should go it's always "Well, these writers OBVIOUSLY don't know Trek..."I doubt this group of Trek Writers knows about the TOS/TNG warp scale thing. They just wanted to emulate the "calling out the warp speed in TVH" thing...
I doubt this group of Trek Writers knows about the TOS/TNG warp scale thing. They just wanted to emulate the "calling out the warp I speed in TVH" thing...
The original conceit was it was our Future, just as most TV shows are set in our "present". I'm sure Gene and company had no intention of some sort of alternate reality.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.