• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Season 2 Trailers, Previews, and Promos

According to floodmap.net, this is what 200 m of water would look like:

L1LPsfa.png
 
Just checked that website, in the area of San Diego where my mom and stepdad live, their house will be on an island in a small island chain just off the newly formed coastline. They live on a hilltop in East County, thank goodness or they would be underwater!
 
JANEWAY: Have you ever been to southern California, Chakotay?
CHAKOTAY: No.
JANEWAY: After the Hermosa quake in 2047 this entire region sank under two hundred metres of water. It became one of the world's largest coral reefs, home to thousands of different marine species.
This is an example of writers not understanding what they're writing. A 200m seismic shift would be catastrophic for not just "the region". That would pretty much kill everyone in the LA basin (10s of millions!), and cause significant damage to Southern and Central California. 200 cm is more likely, and even that is a huge shift.

For comparison, compare to the 1964 Alaska Quake: that was a 9.2 magnitude shaker (one of the strongest that caused about 20m of *lateral* motion (not vertical). The strongest earthquake ever -- 9.5 in Chile, 1960 -- caused similar damage. But 200m? The writers need to learn the metric system.
 
Last edited:
Alas that's what Janeway said, and Janeway was a scientist. Perhaps she was exaggerating -- reefs can't grow at depths of 200m anyway, maybe she meant 200m from the new coastline

2047 could have been during world war three (depending on exactly what that means of course), 600 million dead, perhaps the quake was actually part of ww3, with someone deliberately causing it, perhaps LA was a ghost town (as suggested in the novelisation of TMP) because of the buildup and fear of WW3

Of course it was a throwaway line, and we've been explaining and ignoring such lines for 56 years - especially ridiculous ones.
 
well, Greater Los Angeles is an actual thing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Los_Angeles

Yes, but it's not a city. I guess sometime in the Trek future, it will be.
62mrc6.gif

62mpo1.gif

They should go back in time to El Pueblo De Los Angeles 1781, while everyone in the crew is adjusting their universal translators trying to communicate,
Rios is all: Saludos mis Amigos! Dónde hay Cantina, Aguardiente, un buen puro, y Mujeres!? :D
\
62o0pn.gif


Others: I think that means he's getting help, right?
\
62o6eg.gif
 
Last edited:
Trailers look good.

But the trailers to these shows have fooled me before.
 
"Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me—can't get fooled again.”
Poor Bush, I think this song (from his stoner days) intruded in his head.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Now I want it put to a montage of La Sirena flying around through space and time.
626lzs.gif

626n62.gif

626qf7.gif
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top