• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    185
Waititi did an outstanding job on the season one finale of The Mandalorian (he also did the voice of IG-11).

If that's any indication, then I think one should hope for a very good film.

Ragnarok is the best Marvel movie imo. I've gotten pretty bored with the franchise. It's just all so same-y. I have my fingers crossed for this one though.
 
Oh, Disney's put out its share of R-rated movies, just not under the Disney brand. That's why they created the Touchstone imprint in the '80s, so they could put out more adult content without it being hamstrung by the preconceptions attached to the Disney name.
Splash was the first film I saw in the cinema where I got to see a naked lady. Good times.
 
That's on Hulu in the states though.

Right, that is what I was responding to--here it is on Star which is automatically included in a Disney+ subscription.

Disney owned Miramax when that studio was distributing and/or making Clerks and Pulp Fiction. Something tells me they're not as hung up on all the R-rated material as a lot of us are.

For me the surprise is continuing to produce Deadpool as an MCU property. It seems that the MCU (like Star Wars and movies/shows under the Disney banner) is what they want to keep PG-13. --and that makes sense because families and younger people make a huge percentage of the audience for those properties.
 
I'm sure there's a way to make Ryan Reynolds dark and snarky with sharp one-liners without making him foul-mouthed and turning off a PG-13 audience with lots of kids in it. Frankly a lot of his humor in his own films works if you just change some words.
 
and a PG-rated movie too. Probably would have gotten PG-13 if it came out later that year once PG-13 started being used. Would likely not even get a PG-13 today and be rated R unless all nudity was removed.
I've forgotten a lot about that movie, apart from Darryl Hannah's magic ability to have hair precisely where it needed to be at any point to ruin my young adolescent day, but I still sometimes find myself exclaiming "What a week I'm having!"
 
Right, that is what I was responding to--here it is on Star which is automatically included in a Disney+ subscription.
How does Star work exactly? Is it a section within the Disney+ app itself? I bring up the distinction when people mention Disney and adult content where in the US it is strictly gated off by such content not being on Disney+ itself at all.

I just wonder if when people in the US talk about Disney not having such content if it's perceived the same way from outside. In the US it's clearly separated.

As to Splash, it's still a bit weird to me that Disney actually digitally lengthened her hair to cover her butt. When did we get so prudish with this stuff, it was not uncommon to have a little nudity in PG/PG-13 stuff in the 70s and 80s.
 
Kids could see them then as well, we did alright.

Actually I never noticed before, I was checking the content settings on D+ and they don't even have a setting above TV-14.
 
How does Star work exactly? Is it a section within the Disney+ app itself? I bring up the distinction when people mention Disney and adult content where in the US it is strictly gated off by such content not being on Disney+ itself at all.

I just wonder if when people in the US talk about Disney not having such content if it's perceived the same way from outside. In the US it's clearly separated.

It is a section within Disney like the Marvel and the Star Wars sections. In order to access it you need an "adult" profile with a PIN on Disney plus. The annoying thing (for me) is that you need to enter the PIN every time you enter Disney plus--and I can't figure out how to remove that. The idea would have been great for any streaming service when my kids were younger, as it is something Netflix really needs.

As to Splash, it's still a bit weird to me that Disney actually digitally lengthened her hair to cover her butt. When did we get so prudish with this stuff, it was not uncommon to have a little nudity in PG/PG-13 stuff in the 70s and 80s.

That was probably done because the Disney Plus station is meant for all ages and everybody. Here, I don't know if Splash is on the Star section now (it wasn't when Star began), but if it were then it probably wouldn't be edited.

As for nudity in the 70s and 80s, I have mixed feelings about that now. On the one hand, I think the tendency toward prudishness in contemporary society is not a good thing. On the other, there have just been too many stories from actresses who say they were forced into doing nude scenes back in the day and who now regret those decisions. Less nudity in films today also signifies that young women have more control over their bodies and their film contracts.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top