What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
Would that makes “Lower Decks” the 1960s Casino Royale?
I don't understand what you're saying.
Personally, I think Austin did the Bond franchise a favor. It showed just how campy the franchise had become (and it paved the way for Daniel Craig's gritty, realistic Bond).
If Berman Trek can be likened to Moore/Brosnan Bond, then Picard can be likened to Danial Craig Bond (dark, edgy, gritty).
Last edited:
I’m not sure if I can recommend the 1960’s casino royale adaptation, but it’s certainly a thing to behold. I don’t honestly think Star Trek has ever hit this level of floundering, half-ironic self parody.I don't understand what you're saying.
But enough about season two of Star Trek: Enterprise already.
I don't know if self-parody was one of Season 2's crimes but boredom and laziness in writing sure were for much of it.
More of a Moonraker. Officially happened and all that... but, really?
To me LD is 100% canonical. Maybe even 120%.
But I accept if others see it differently.
But I accept if others see it differently.
So is Moonraker. Doesn't make it any less fun to watch.
Moonraker is downright comic book ridiculous in parts. But it happens two years before the events of For Your Eyes Only and two after The Spy Who Loved Me and is part of the canonical continuity of the original Bond movie timeline.
Thanks for explaining that, because I don't know the first thing about Bond Movies
Like honestly, I've seen only ever one of the Bond movies (one of the Daniel Craig ones), at a friend's place.
In fact, here's a primer for your obscure James Bond movie fact list: the comic book adaptation of For Your Eyes Only states that the Bond-Blofeld confrontation in that movie happens on the 10th Anniversary of their last encounter in Diamonds Are Forever, the final Sean Connery movie in the continuity and - incidentally - a film released 10 years before For Your Eyes Only. 
In fact, here's a primer for your obscure James Bond movie fact list: the comic book adaptation of For Your Eyes Only states that the Bond-Blofeld confrontation in that movie happens on the 10th Anniversary of their last encounter in Diamonds Are Forever, the final Sean Connery movie in the continuity and - incidentally - a film released 10 years before For Your Eyes Only.
Shhh ... it's not official.
In FYEO, Bond fights a villain in an electric wheelchair who just HAPPENS to look and sound like Blofeld.
[*Awards you a delicatessen made from stainless steel*]
The man who participated in his wife's murder goes down like a punk with a pat on his bald head and a dump down an industrial smokestack.
The man who participated in his wife's murder goes down like a punk with a pat on his bald head and a dump down an industrial smokestack.
There's a reason the man is an icon.
Only Roger Moore's Bond could kill the series' most legendary lead villain in such a fashion.
Similar threads
- Locked
