So, now you know the answer to this all-important trivial tidbit.Actually, no you didn't. Saying "There's plenty of potential unknown bad guys" is different from flat out saying "I would pick an unknown bad guy."
So, now you know the answer to this all-important trivial tidbit.Actually, no you didn't. Saying "There's plenty of potential unknown bad guys" is different from flat out saying "I would pick an unknown bad guy."
Probably for the best. At least right now.Regardless, unless someone decides to do an official actual story (whose not LFIM), it can be left to one’s imagination.
Except for the fact Yvonne Craig was in it.'Whom Gods Destroy' isn't even a particularly great episode that deserves such interest.
Well, it's not so much the whole episode. We just want to find the backstory behind a couple of lines of Kirk's dialogue. Think of it like the opening paragraph of A New Hope's opening crawl. You didn't know the nature of the Rebel Starfleet's victory till someone made Rogue One.I'm not trying to be controversial but 'Whom Gods Destroy' isn't even a particularly great episode that deserves such interest. I don't hate it but when I watched it recently I was reminded how, well, silly much of it was.
Indeed, but this is the nature of fandom. To peel back these hinted at historical events and find out more, like why Kirk admires Garth so much. The episode itself is not great, and I don't find much enjoyment from any of it (aside from an Andorian appearance), but the hints at past events is what draws Trek fans interest. Much like Strange New Worlds is offering an opportunity to explore Captain Pike. He was barely mentioned, but still garnered interest because of implied history.I'm not trying to be controversial but 'Whom Gods Destroy' isn't even a particularly great episode that deserves such interest. I don't hate it but when I watched it recently I was reminded how, well, silly much of it was.
Well, it's not so much the whole episode. We just want to find the backstory behind a couple of lines of Kirk's dialogue. Think of it like the opening paragraph of A New Hope's opening crawl. You didn't know the nature of the Rebel Starfleet's victory till someone made Rogue One.
I think Alec Peters was drawn to the character because Garth was someone whom Kirk idolised.I'm not trying to be controversial but 'Whom Gods Destroy' isn't even a particularly great episode that deserves such interest. I don't hate it but when I watched it recently I was reminded how, well, silly much of it was.
To be fair, Mr Hertzler is 71. Yet didn't he have a voice over part in Season 1 of "Lower Decks" (according to IMDb)?I don't think his calendar is full of any other engagements.......
uh, no we don'tWe just want to find the backstory behind a couple of lines of Kirk's dialogue.
Some of us do. Happy?uh, no we don't
He's also done a lot of VO for Star Trek Online.To be fair, Mr Hertzler is 71. Yet didn't he have a voice over part in Season 1 of "Lower Decks" (according to IMDb)?
To be fair, a lot of Star Trek actors from the previous series as well as the current Star Trek series (All three) have done VO for Star Trek Online.He's also done a lot of VO for Star Trek Online.
The sunk cost fallacy as well as dissatisfaction with the current Trek output will do that.How long are people willing to wait for this ?
I don’t see any update on the page you linked.Well this is getting fun/sad...........
ATLANTA — In a revised report of the DragonCon altercation between Axanar producer Alec Peters and critic Shawn O'Halloran, Atlanta police have now charged Peters with assault.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.